Cases

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DEFENDANTS IONIA COUNTY, GARY M. GABRY, RAYMOND P. VOET, RONALD J. SCHAFER, AND GAIL BENDA [39] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This is a civil rights case brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 2, 2014, Plaintiff David Gavitt filed a complaint against numerous Defendants, including Ionia County; former Ionia County Pro

221 F.Supp.2d 799 (2002) Rabih HADDAD, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, et al., Defendants. No. 02-70605. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 17, 2002. *800 Elizabeth L. Gleicher, Gleicher & Patek, Royal Oak, MI, for Plaintiff. L. Michael Wicks, United States Attorney's Office, Detroit

Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge OVERVIEW This action is an offshoot from a bitter labor dispute between a union and a casino operator. Plaintiff Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation ("Pauma" or "Tribe") is a federally-recognized tribe that operates Casino Pauma on its reservation in Northern San Diego County. "About 2,900 customers visit Cas

01/22/2025 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 29, 2024 Session CHARLES YOUREE, JR. v. RECOVERY HOUSE OF EAST TENNESSEE, LLC ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 20-11

68 F.Supp.2d 802 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiffs, v. Efraim GARCIA, Defendant. No. 97-80727. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 22, 1999. *803 *804 William Sauget, AUSA, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiffs. Jeffrey Urdanger, Chicago, IL, Harold

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KING joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs James Brooks and Donald Hamlette, corrections officers at the Correctional Unit in Rustburg, Virginia, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants unlawfully fired

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. The key question in this case is not an easy one. We must determine when dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 10 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is appropriate. In so doing, we also attempt to provide more structure to a narrow area of law that has been subject to confusion within this Circuit. The specific

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0146p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, │ Samantha Will

*940 OPINION THOMAS, Chief Judge: In this appeal, class members challenge the district court’s approval of a settlement between Walmart 1 and a class of Netflix DVD subscribers arguing, among other matters, that the gift c

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1110, the introduction, part I of the Discussion and the Disposition of this opinion are certified for publication. [EDITORS' NOTE: TEXT NOT CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPEARS WITH GRAY BACKGROUND BELOW.] OPINION These three matters proceeded simultaneously in the trial court without formal consolidation. In a joint trial of case Nos. 06

LIU, J., Concurring and Dissenting. As Justice Werdegar observes, “defendant failed in the trial court to challenge the applicability of the passenger’s parole search condition or the permissible scope of the warrant-less search . . . .” (Cone. & dis. opn. of Werdegar, J., ante, at p. 934.) As a result, the record in this case is very limited. We know that the police officer conducted

923 F.Supp. 1273 (1996) Michael V. BARBATO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. CV 95-6666-E. United States District Court, C.D. California. April 18, 1996. *1274 Edmund Parent, Santa Barbara, CA, for Plaintiff. Russell W. Chittenden, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for De

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-1832 _____________ MADISON M. LARA; SOPHIA KNEPLEY; LOGAN D. MILLER; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, Appellants v. COMMISSIONER PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE __________ On Appeal from th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HELEN DOE, parent and next friend No. 23-16026 of Jane Doe; JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe; KATE ROE, D.C. No. 4:23-cv- parent and next friend of Megan Roe; 00185-JGZ ROBERT ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superinten

387 F.Supp.2d 794 (2005) LOEFFEL STEEL PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. DELTA BRANDS, INC., d/b/a DBI; and Samuel F. Savariego, individually, Defendants. No. 01 C 9389. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 22, 2005. *795 *796 *797

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Doe v. Lawrence Hall Youth Services, 2012 IL App (1st) 103758 Appellate Court JOHN DOE, a Minor, by his Father and Next Friend, RICHARD DOE, Caption Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAWRENCE HALL YOUTH SERVICES, an Illinois Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. District & No. First District, Fourth Division

MEMORANDUM DECISION ' AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”), Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, Inc. (“ROC United”), Jill Phaneuf, and Eric Goode (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this suit against Defendant Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 201 OPINION This is a proceeding for writ of mandate brought by three ex-felons to compel respondent election officials to register them as voters. The case calls into question once again the constitutionality of provisions of California law excluding from the franchise all persons who have been

696 So.2d 1 (1997) The WESTERN COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DYNASTY TRANSPORTATION, INC., Shelton Joseph Zenon and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds's London, Defendants-Appellants. No. 96-877. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 7, 1997. Michael J. Juneau, Lafayette, for The Western Company of North America. T.C.W. Ellis, Winsto

717 F.Supp.2d 790 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Clifton M. JEFFERSON, Defendant. Case No. 2:09-cr-242. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 15, 2010. *794 David Devillers, United States Attorney, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SAR