Cases

720 S.W.2d 838 (1986) Maria De Los Angeles BOTELLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 04-86-00077-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. October 22, 1986. *839 Jose Eduardo Pena, Laredo, for appellant. Rogelio Rios, Laredo, for appellee. Before CADENA, C.J., and BUTTS and DIAL, JJ.

897 S.W.2d 458 (1995) AG VOLKSWAGEN, Relator, v. The Honorable Rogelio VALDEZ, Judge, 357th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, Respondent. No. 13-94-600-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. March 30, 1995. Rehearing Overruled May 4, 1995. *459 Ruben R. Pena, Harlingen, Bruce L. Jamison, J

61 S.W.3d 559 (2001) "Y" PROPANE SERVICE, INC., Appellant, v. Maria GARCIA, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Francisco Garcia, Deceased, Rogelio Garcia, Ubaldo Garcia, Francisco Garcia, Jr., and Maribel Garcia, Appellees. No. 04-99-00880-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. August 15, 2001. *561 Ana Lisa

757 S.W.2d 744 (1988) Rogelio Rangel HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 69649. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. June 29, 1988. Rehearing Denied September 21, 1988. *745 Jose Eduardo Pena, Hector Leal, Jr., Laredo, for appellant. Julio A. Garcia, Dist. Atty., Jose A. Flor

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

GEWIN,* Circuit Judge: I. Introduction The fourteen herein named defendants-appellants seek relief from their convictions and sentences rendered in a non-jury trial by the district court for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute. The following nine issues are raised on this appeal: (1) whether appellants were placed in double jeopardy; (2) whether the superseding indictment wa

647 F.2d 537 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 790 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joseph Gonzalez ALVARADO, Jr., Rogelio Arenas, Ernesto J.Gonzalez, Rodolfo Gonzalez, Rogelio Gonzalez, Eliseo Guerra,Carlos Nieto, Magin Reyes, Emilio Salinas, Luis GumaroTamez, Pablo Villa, Guadalupe Garcia, Enrique Garcia andJuventino Salinas Munoz, Defendants-Appellants. No. 80-1340.

OPINION MEYERS, Judge. Appellant was convicted in July 1990 of capital murder under Texas Penal Code § 19.03(a)(2) for a murder committed in August 1987 during the course of a robbery. After the jury returned affirmative findings to the two special issues submitted pursuant to Art. 37.071(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, appellant was sentenced to death under Art. 37.071(e).1

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

OPINION BENAVIDES, Justice. A jury found appellant guilty of engaging in organized criminal activity and assessed his punishment at 99 years in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant raises numerous issues in 37 points of error. We vacate the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court because of error which occurred in the punishment phase of trial. In his first point of

APPOINTMENT OF PRETRIAL JUDGE IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE: Pursuant to Administrative Rule 13, the cases listed on Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, and tag-along cases if any, are transferred to Judge Tracy Christopher of the 295th District Court of Harris County. Justice CASTILLO not sitting. APPENDIX A Amended Appendix A, Part I and

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. CGG Land (U.S.) Inc.’s employees (Employees) brought this collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA generally requires employers to compensate overtime hours at one and one-half times the employee’s “regular rate” of pay. See 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1) (2012). Employees claim that CGG violated

ACCEPTED 15-25-00005-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/25/2025 2:57 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE No. 15-25-00005-CV CLERK FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On