Cases

639 F.3d 355 (2011) Augusta EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIGGS & STRATTON RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-2326. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 18, 2011. Decided April 29, 2011. *358 Mark D. DeBofsky (argued), Attorney, Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL

Stratton v. Royal Bank of Can., 2010 NCBC 2. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 07 CVS 15079 ELIZABETH BRUCE STRATTON, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) OPINION A

143 N.J. 448 (1996) 672 A.2d 1147 GARRETT M. HEHER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. SMITH, STRATTON, WISE, HEHER AND BRENNAN, A NEW JERSEY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, III, HUGH D. WISE, JR., HENRY S. BROAD, JOHN ROBERT HEHER, ARTHUR S. LANE, CHRISTOPHER S. TARR, ANNE REICHELDERFER, ALEXANDER P. WAUGH, JR., WENDY L. MAGER, RICHARD J. PINTO, BRIAN P. SULLIVAN, SUZANNE M. MCSORLEY, MARSHA E. NOVICK,

Per Curiam. For a writ of mandamus to issue, the relator must possess a clear legal right to the respondent’s performance of a clear legal duty and have no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Scripps Howard Broadcasting Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 19, 20, 652 N.E.2d 179, 181. The court of appeals dismissed this cause on the grounds that M.P. could

20 F.Supp.2d 1356 (1998) BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, Plaintiff, v. CONCRETE SALES & SERVICES, et al., Defendants, v. PEACH METAL INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. 5:95-cv-525-1 (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. September 28, 1998. *1357

971 F.Supp. 566 (1997) BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, Plaintiff, v. CONCRETE SALES & SERVICES, INC., a Georgia corporation; Frances M. Coody and Timothy A. McCord, as Trustees for the Irrevocable Trust of T.A. McCord, Jr.; Turner Ashby McCord, Jr.; Alvin E. DeGraw, Jr.; and Peach County, Georgia, Defendants. v. David E. ROSE; Peach Metal Industries, Inc.; Ann H. DeGraw as Executrix of the Estate of Alvin E

*1371 D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Ronald E. Bemis brought a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against police officers Tim Edwards, Leo Lotito, Perry Aldrich, and the City of Bend, Oregon (“Appellees”) in which he claimed that the police had used excessive force against him. In his ap

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 565.] THE STATE EX REL. MIDWEST PRIDE IV, INC., APPELLANT, v. PONTIOUS, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc., v. Pontious, 1996-Ohio-459.] Mandamus to compel common pleas court judge to vacate his order setting aside sheriff’s sale of real property successfully bid on by relator—Complaint dismissed, when. (No. 95-1297—S

228 F.3d 68 (2nd Cir. 2000) LEKUNUTU MATIMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.ANDREA E. CELLI, Trustee with reference to the Chapter 13 bankruptcy of Lekunutu and Mabatho Matima, Bankruptcy Case No. 95-14372, Trustee,AYERST LABORATORIES INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. Docket Nos. 97-9451, 98-7199Nos. 1500, 606--August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

445 F.Supp. 1305 (1978) Kathleen S. STRATTON et al. v. Clarence A. DRUMM, Individually and as Chief of Police for the Town of East Hartford, et al. Civ. No. H-77-545. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 23, 1978. *1306 Samuel H. Teller, East Hartford, Conn., Edward T. Lynch, Jr., New Britain, Conn., for plainti

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 97 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 98 {¶ 1} Appellant, Kellan Krueger, appeals his convictions on four counts of theft, all violations of R.C. <

O’Connor, J., dissenting. {¶ 20} The majority incorrectly invokes a reasonableness test to assess whether R.C. 2923.12 infringes upon the fundamental constitutional right to bear arms. For reasons that follow, I believe that this statute should be subjected to intermediate scrutiny. After applying intermediate scrutiny, I conclude that while the overall objective of R.C. 2923.12 is constitutional, the framewor

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-2035 Filed July 26, 2023 C.S., on behalf of H.S., a child, Petitioner-Appellee, vs. J.C., Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Melissa Anderson-Seeber, Judge. J.C. appeals the imposition of a protective o

381 S.C. 445 (2009) 673 S.E.2d 813 Anthony HARDEE, Employee/Claimant, v. Harry D. McDOWELL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of W.D. McDowell, Uninsured Employer, and S.E. Smith Construction Co., Inc., Alleged Statutory Employer, and Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Carrier/Defendant/Appellants, with the South Carolina Uninsured Employers' Fund, Appearing/Respondents, of whom Harry D. McDowell

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, John Harold Large of Warren, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0068732, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1997. On April 11, 2011, relator, Trumbull County Bar Association, filed a four-count complaint against Large for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. Large was previously discipl

336 F.Supp.2d 852 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James M. DUFF, Patricia Green Duff, William E. Stratton, John J. Leahy, Edward Wisniewski, Starling Alexander, and Terrence Dolan, Defendants. No. 03 CR 922. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 22, 2004. *853 Charles E. Ex, David

Cupp, J. {¶ 1} In this certified conflict, we consider whether a trial court’s failure to impose the fine required by R.C. 2925.11(E)(1)(a) and 2929.18(B)(1), when no affidavit of indigency has been filed with the court prior to the trial court’s journal entry of sentencing, renders void the part of the sentence waiving the fine. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that a t

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, Edward Paul Brueggeman of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0029159, was admitted to practice law in Ohio in 1972. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline concluded that respondent engaged in professional misconduct and recommends that this court suspend his license to practice la

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an inmate’s petition for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Ohio Adult Parole Authority, to give him a *341meaningful parole hearing in accordance with Ankrom v. Hageman, Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-984, 04AP-985, 04AP-986, 04AP-987, 04AP-988, 04AP-989, 04AP-990, 04AP-991, 04AP-993, and 04AP-994,

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In December 1993, the Youngstown Police Department issued a warrant for the arrest of appellant, Edward A. Davis, on a felony assault charge. In the same month, the Ohio Adult Parole Authority (“APA”) issued a separate warrant for Davis’s arrest for a parole violation. In June 1996, Davis was arrested in Las Vegas, Nevada, on the APA warrant and was informed of the Youngstown warrant. Davis waived extraditi