⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Edward Joseph Burke, III”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 111 F.3d 126; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 8213; 1997 WL 173179
111 F.3d 126 Willie Edward McKinnon, IIIv.Joseph F. Mazurkiewicz, Pennsylvania Board of Parole, EdwardBurke, Richard M. Leathors NO. 95-7075 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Mar 24, 1997 Appeal From: M.D.Pa. ,No.94CV02112 1 Affirmed
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-05-30 · Published · cited 37× · 496 B.R. 706; 2013 WL 2359493; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76294
ORDER AND OPINION LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge. Following District Judge Barbara Jones’s dismissal of a related matter {“Fried /”), Plaintiffs filed this action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, pleading various federal and state law claims against Defendants arising from failed investments with Defendant Lehman Brothers Real Estate Associates III.1
Burke v. Ruttenbergpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000-04-07 · Published · cited 8× · 102 F. Supp. 2d 1280; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9723; 2000 WL 815330
102 F.Supp.2d 1280 (2000) Peter H. BURKE et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Harold RUTTENBERG, et al., Defendants. George W. Massey, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Harold Ruttenberg, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV99-BU-3097-S, CV99-BU-3129-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division.<
Bartlett v. Burkepublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-588 No. COA22-95 Filed 6 September 2022 Durham County, No. 17-CVS-004551 LENNARD BARTLETT, SR. ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY SUSAN WHITE BARTLETT, Plaintiff, v. ESTATE OF JEFFREY L. BURKE; AIR METHODS CORPORATION; AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUTSCHLAND, GMBH; AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.; SAFRAN HELICOPTER ENGINES;
Bartlett v. Burkepublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-588 No. COA22-95 Filed 6 September 2022 Durham County, No. 17-CVS-004551 LENNARD BARTLETT, SR. ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY SUSAN WHITE BARTLETT, Plaintiff, v. ESTATE OF JEFFREY L. BURKE; AIR METHODS CORPORATION; AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUTSCHLAND, GMBH; AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.; SAFRAN HELICOPTER ENGINES;
Bartlett v. Burkepublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-588 No. COA22-95 Filed 6 September 2022 Durham County, No. 17-CVS-004551 LENNARD BARTLETT, SR. ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY SUSAN WHITE BARTLETT, Plaintiff, v. ESTATE OF JEFFREY L. BURKE; AIR METHODS CORPORATION; AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUTSCHLAND, GMBH; AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.; SAFRAN HELICOPTER ENGINES;
Burke v. Mesniaeffpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 334 Conn. 100
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Hudson v. Burkepublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985-09-24 · Published · cited 5× · 617 F. Supp. 1501; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15644
617 F.Supp. 1501 (1985) Henry HUDSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edward BURKE and the City of Chicago, Defendants. No. 83 C 5785. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. September 24, 1985. *1502 *1503 Aram Hartunian, Joel M. Hellman & Benjamin A. Streeter, III, Hartunian, Futterman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-09-13 · Published · cited 3× · 694 F.3d 1062; 2012 WL 4015774; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19226
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 11-30140 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  DC No. CR 11-0044 EFS ANTHONY EDYLE BURKE, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-10-12 · Published · cited 0×
10/12/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 8, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSEPH GRIGGS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 18-CR-168 J. Weber McCraw, Judge No. W2020-01686-CCA-R3-CD A Har
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2026-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-KA-01382-SCT JOSEPH ANTHONY ZATTONI a/k/a JOSEPH A. ZATTONI a/k/a JOSEPH ZATTONI v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ELEANOR JOHNSON PETERSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JAMES ANDERSON, JR. ANDREW JAMES WILLIAMS JAMES
In Re Joseph D.public domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-11-10 · Published · cited 0×
11/10/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 3, 2022 IN RE JOSEPH D. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Hickman County No. 21-JV-133 Amy Cook Puckett, Judge
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 146 A.3d 755; 637 Pa. 100; 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2179; 2016 WL 5469487
[J-16-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 23 MAP 2015 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the Superior : Court dated July 24, 2014,
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024-07-30 · Published · cited 5× · 110 F.4th 210
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-1977 ______________ JOSEPH D. MARCY, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA On Appeal from the U
Burke v. Burkepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993-05-03 · Published · cited 5× · 429 S.E.2d 85; 263 Ga. 141; 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1765; 1993 Ga. LEXIS 408
263 Ga. 141 (1993) 429 S.E.2d 85 BURKE v. BURKE. S93A0133. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided May 3, 1993. Reconsideration Denied May 27, 1993. Wilson, Strickland & Benson, Robert G. Wellon, Samuel T. Brannan III, for appellant. Simmons, Warren & Szczecko, Joseph Szczecko, for appellee. HUNS
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004-10-19 · Published · cited 14× · 817 N.E.2d 1230; 353 Ill. App. 3d 197; 288 Ill. Dec. 580; 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1289
PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MALLEY delivered the opinion of the court as to Parts I, II, III, and I\£ in which JUSTICE BOWMAN and JUSTICE GILLERAN JOHNSON concur. JUSTICE BOWMAN delivered the opinion of the court as to Part V, in which PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MALLEY concurs. JUSTICE GILLERAN JOHNSON dissents from Part V PRESIDING JUSTIC
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-06-26 · Published · cited 92× · 893 F.3d 906
RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Joseph Hendrix is currently serving a life sentence imposed by a Michigan state court following his conviction for felony murder, carjacking, and unlawfully driving away a motor vehicle. The district court conditionally granted Hendrix's application for a writ of habeas corpus brought under
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2016-05-05 · Published · cited 44× · 487 S.W.3d 864; 2016 Ky. LEXIS 179; 2016 WL 2604832
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VENTERS Appellant, Saint Joseph Healthcare, Inc. d/b/a Saint Joseph Hospital (the Hospital), appeals from an opinion of the Court of Appeals that affirmed a Fayette Circuit Court judgment awarding $1,450,000.00 in punitive damages to Larry O’Neil Thomas, Executor of the Estate of James Milford Gray and Gray’s statutory survivors (collectively “the Estate”). The award was based upon a jury verdict finding t
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004-10-19 · Published · cited 0×
No. 2--02--1299 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2535 ___________ Edward H. Kountze, in his capacity * as Trustee and on behalf of the * Gilbert M. and Martha H. Hitchcock * Foundation, a Nebraska Nonprofit * Organization, * * Appellant,