Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Edward N. Eckes v. American Standard”
MEMORANDUM & ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR FEES PURSUANT TO K;S.A. § 40-256 Kenneth G. Gale, United States Magistrate Judge This action was brought by Plaintiff Wichita Fireman’s Relief Association (WFRA) on behalf of its member, the late Captain Urban Eck, to recover an accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) benefit in'a life insurance policy issued by Defendant Kansas . City, Life Ins
American Chemical Works Co. v. International Nickel, Inc. (In Re American Chemical Works Co.)public domain
235 B.R. 216 (1999) In re AMERICAN CHEMICAL WORKS COMPANY, d/b/a Baylis-American, Debtor. American Chemical Works Company, d/b/a Baylis-American, Plaintiff, v. International Nickel, Inc., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 94-11199. Adversary No. 94-1177. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island. June 1, 1999. *217
Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicinepublic domain
988 F.Supp. 127 (1997) Gregory F. DANIEL, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BOARD OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, et al., Defendants. No. 90-CV-1086A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 19, 1997. *128 *129 *130 *1
Walker v. Cardinal Savings & Loan Ass'npublic domain
690 F.Supp. 494 (1988) William M. WALKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CARDINAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-0123-R. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. July 19, 1988. *495 Donald W. Lemons, Alfred S. Bryant, Wyatt B. Durrette, Jr., William J. Irvin, McCarthy & Durrett
Bartel v. Farrell Linespublic domain
Bartel v Farrell Lines (2023 NY Slip Op 02057) Bartel v Farrell Lines 2023 NY Slip Op 02057 Decided on April 20, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Bartel v. Farrell Linespublic domain
Bartel v Farrell Lines (2023 NY Slip Op 02057) Bartel v Farrell Lines 2023 NY Slip Op 02057 Decided on April 20, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Bartel v. Maersk Line, Ltd.public domain
Bartel v Maersk Line, Ltd. (2023 NY Slip Op 02058) Bartel v Maersk Line, Ltd. 2023 NY Slip Op 02058 Decided on April 20, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Bartel v. Maersk Line, Ltd.public domain
Bartel v Maersk Line, Ltd. (2023 NY Slip Op 02058) Bartel v Maersk Line, Ltd. 2023 NY Slip Op 02058 Decided on April 20, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Want Ad Digest, Inc. v. Display Advertising, Inc.public domain
653 F.Supp.2d 171 (2009) WANT AD DIGEST, INC., Plaintiff, v. DISPLAY ADVERTISING, INC. and Edward H. Spain, Defendants. No. 1:08-CV-189 (GLS/DRH). United States District Court, N.D. New York. September 3, 2009. *173 Girvin, Ferlazzo Law Firm, Salvatore Ferlazzo, Esq., Robert Manfredo, Esq., of Counsel, Albany, NY, for the Plainti
Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, Llcpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TARLA MAKAEFF, on behalf of No. 11-55016 herself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-counter-defendant- 3:10-cv-00940- Appellant, IEG-WVG and OPINION BRANDON KELLER; ED OBERKROM ; PATRICIA MURPHY , Plainti
Crocker v. Townsend Oil Co.public domain
Cordy, J. In this case, we consider an employment dispute arising under G. L. c. 149, §§ 148 and 150 (Wage Act), between the defendant, Townsend Oil Company, Incorporated (Townsend), a home heating oil company, and the plaintiffs, Charles Edward Crocker (Crocker) and Joseph Barrasso (Barrasso), two former delivery truck drivers. The plaintiffs contend that they are owed compensation (including overtime pay) based on their proper
Town of Foxfield v. Archdiocese of Denverpublic domain
148 P.3d 339 (2006) TOWN OF FOXFIELD, Colorado, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. The ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Monsignor Edward L. Buelt, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant, and United States Department of Justice, Intervenor. No. 05CA0202. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.<
Low v. Trump University, LLCpublic domain
ORDER: (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARDS [10cv940, ECF Nos. 589, 590.] [13cv2519, ECF Nos. 294, 295.] Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge On February 1
OPINION KELLY, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Southersby Development Corporation (“Southersby”), a real estate developer, filed this action against the Borough of Jefferson Hills (“the Borough”) and William L. McVicker (“McVicker”) (collectively “Defendants”), a former Borough employee, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), alleging that Defendants violated its right to equ
Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LLCpublic domain
Order; Concurrence by Judges WARDLAW and CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge WATFORD. ORDER Chief Judge Kozinski and Judge Paez have voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Wardlaw has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on
Dorwart v. Carawaypublic domain
58 P.3d 128 (2002) 2002 MT 240 Russell Edward DORWART and Harry Dorwart, Plaintiffs, Appellants and Cross-Respondents, v. Paul CARAWAY, individually, and as a deputy in the Stillwater County Sheriff's Office; Danny Ames, individually, and as a deputy in the Stillwater County Sheriff's Office; Cliff Brophy, individually, and as Sheriff of Stillwater County, Montana; and County of Stillwater, State of Montana, Defendants, Re
Ranieri v. Adirondack Dev. Group, LLCpublic domain
DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently before the Court, in this copyright infringement action filed by Plaintiff, Dominick Ranieri, d/b/a Dominick Ranieri Architect, P.C. (“Plaintiff’) against the above captioned entities and individuals (“Defendants”), are the following four motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56: (1) Plaintiffs motion for
PER CURIAM. The Municipality of Carolina (the “Municipality”) appeals from the bankruptcy court’s denial of its motion to set aside a previous order disallowing a claim filed on its behalf by Shannon Leigh Baker Gonzalez (the “Debtor”) pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 501(c) and Fed. R. Bankr.P. 3004.1 For the reasons set forth below, the decision of the bankruptcy court is AFFIRMED.
Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APEX FROZEN FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED, ASVINI FISHERIES PRIVATE LIMITED, AVANTI FEEDS LIMITED, BLUE PARK SEAFOODS PRIVATE LIMITED, DEVI MARINE FOOD EXPORTS PRIVATE LTD., KADER EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED, KADER INVESTMENT AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, LIBERTY FROZEN FOODS PVT. LTD., LIBERTY OIL MILLS LTD., PREMIER MARINE TRADING PRODUCTS, UNIVERSAL COLD STORAGE PRIVATE LIMITED,
Nazar v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPpublic domain
530 F.Supp.2d 1161 (2008) Edward J. NAZAR in his capacity as Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee for Betty Parks, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, LLP, Defendant. No. 07-2025-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 2, 2008. *1162 *1163 *1164</