Cases

Kelly, Judge: This case is on remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Court of Appeals vacated and remanded this court's decision in Bell Supply Co., LLC v. United States, 39 CIT ----, 83 F.Supp.3d 1311 (2015) (" Bell Supply I"), which held that section 781 of the Tariff

OPINION AND ORDER Kelly, Judge: Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) remand redetermination filed pursuant to the court’s decision in Bell Supply Co. v. United States, 39 CIT -, 83 F.Supp.3d 1311 (2015) (“Bell”). Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, Nov. 9, 2015, ECF No. 88-1 (“Remand Results”). On Feb

OPINION AND ORDER KELLY, Judge: Plaintiff Bell Supply Company, LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “Bell Supply”) brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (2012)1 and section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(B)(vi) (2012),2 for judicial review of the Final Scope Ruling on Green Tubes Manufactured in the People’s Republic of

OPINION Kelly, Judge: Before the court is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) second remand redetermination filed pursuant to the court’s order in Bell Supply Co. v. United States, 40 CIT -, 179 F.Supp.3d 1082 (2016) (“Bell Supply II”) for a remand to Commerce for further consideration of Commerce’s findings in Final Results of

ORDER VANDERVORT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs remaining claim in this case is that Defendant Friedrichs, formerly a teacher and/or principal in the Fayette County Schools, was known by the Board and “Supervising Defendants” to be a pedophile and they, “in spite of such knowledge, failed to take any precautions or actions to prevent Friedrichs from inflicting harm upon young, male

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 16, 2024 Decided July 18, 2025 No. 24-5076 ADAM STEELE AND KRYSTAL COMER, APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:23-cv-00918)

RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before me upon the petition of Missouri state prisoner Leonard Taylor for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 19). After carefully considering Taylor's petition, Respondent's brief (Doc. 29), the underlying record (Doc. 29, Ex. A-

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Petitioner Carman L. Deck is currently on death row at the Potosí Correctional Center in Mineral Point, Missouri, for the murders of James and Zelma Long. Deck was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Missouri, and was sentenced to death for each of the two murders. He is also serving two concurrent life sentenc

Rel: March 7, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM,

784 F.Supp.2d 94 (2011) Samuel Bartley STEELE, Plaintiff, v. John BONGIOVI, individually and d/b/a Bon Jovi Publishing, Scott D. Brown, Christopher G. Clark, Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., Matthew J. Matule, Kenneth A. Plevan, Richard Sambora, individually and d/b/a Aggressive Music, Skadden, ARPS, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates, Clifford M. Sloan and Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., Defendants. Civ

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6189 Doc: 58 Filed: 08/06/2025 Pg: 1 of 43 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-6189 JASON TYANN BELL, Petitioner – Appellant, v. J.C. STREEVAL, Warden of USP Lee, R

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2612 ___________________________ David T. Russell lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Edward R. Anderson

Filed 12/13/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2011 ND 232 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Veronica G R Trevino, Defendant an

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS COMMISSION FOR LAWYER § No. 08-22-00217-CV DISCIPLINE, § Appeal from the Appellant, §

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 27, 2009 Session AMANDA STEELE, ET AL. v. MICHAEL RITZ Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004560-07 Kay S. Robilio, Judge No. W2008-02125-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 16, 2009 The plaintiffs/appellants in this lawsui

55 F.3d 399 Pens. Plan Guide P 23910QG. Bruce WILSON; Marco L. Gilliam; William H. Jones;Robert E. McVey; Jerry Mooneyham; Edwin R. Acheson; J.Marlene Adams; Betty E. Aldridge; Barbara Alexander; JoAnn Altschul; Virginia S. Amyx; Brenda J. Andrews; SandraK. Anglin; Islo D. Ashmore; Jerry L. Atwood; James D.Bailey; Jimmie F. Bailey; Margaret A. Bailey; Patsy R.Bailey; Jerry F. Baker; John C. Baker; Kat

DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Appellants, former management employees of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) who accepted the terms of a severance incentive plan offered in 1990, filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 Ú.S.C. § 1001 et. seq., claiming that SWBT; its parent company, SBC Communications; and its Vice President of Human Resources, Robert A. Dickemper, brea

309 B.R. 139 (2004) In re Maxine B. BELL, Debtor. Maxine B. Bell, and Edward Sparkman, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. Parkway Mortgage, Inc., and Stephen Flacco, t/a Wharton Investments Network, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-14420 KJC. Adversary No. 01-392 KJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 14, 2004. *146

[Cite as Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Cleveland, 2013-Ohio-270.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98683 OHIO BELL TELEPHONE CO. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Kathleen M. Moynihan v. Edward J. Lynch (A-64-20) (085157) Argued November 29, 2021 -- Decided March 8, 2022 ALBIN, J., writing for a unanimous Court. Plaintif