Cases

852 N.E.2d 804 (2006) 221 Ill.2d 613 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois ex rel. Richard DEVINE, Petitioner, v. Honorable Terrence SHARKEY, Respondent. No. 101171. Supreme Court of Illinois. June 22, 2006. *805 Richard A. Devine, State's Attorney, Chicago (James E. Fitzgerald, Alan J. Spellberg and Sang Wo

JOHN M, WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant’ Ryan Dufort appeals from a memorandum and order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Steven M. Gold, M.J.)2 granting summary judgment to the defendants, the City of New York and New York City police officers Joseph Mar-otta, Jae Shim, Thomas Confortó, and William Schmi

823 N.E.2d 117 (2005) 355 Ill. App.3d 194 291 Ill.Dec. 107 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald TILLMAN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-03-2234. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. January 14, 2005. Rehearing Denied February 14, 2004.

831 A.2d 756 (2003) NOAH'S ARK CHRISTIAN CHILD CARE CENTER, INC. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST MIFFLIN v. Borough of West Mifflin and Second Baptist Church of Homestead. Appeal of Borough of West Mifflin. Noah's Ark Christian Child Care Center, Inc. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of West Mifflin v.

Judge Edwin A. Lombard |! Grand Isle Shipyard, Inc. (“GIS”), and its insurer, Gray Insurance Company (“Gray”), collectively “the Appellants,” seek review of the March 2, 2016 judgment of the Office of Worker’s Compensation (“OWC”) awarding the Appellee, David Thibodaux, Jr., supplemental earnings benefits, medical payments, penalties, attorneys’ fees and costs. Finding that the judgment of the OWC is neither manifestly erron

433 S.E.2d 841 (1993) William C. MYERS, Edward T. McMullen, Jr., and the South Carolina Policy Council Education Foundation, Plaintiffs, v. Grady L. PATTERSON, Jr., State Treasurer of South Carolina, W.H. Alford, T.C. Atkinson, C.T. Brooks, Sr., V.C. Caggiano, Jr., V.L. Chapman, T.A. Drayton, J.C. Harden, R.W. Harrell, Sr., W.B. Harvey, Jr., A.B. McLeod, Jr., F.S. McWhirter, J. Mullinax, R.B. Ness, J.K. Newsom, Sr., W.M. Self, H.C. Shealy, D.E. W

947 So.2d 740 (2006) TOURO INFIRMARY v. SIZELER ARCHITECTS, a Professional Corporation. Touro Infirmary v. Sizeler Architects, a Professional Corporation and I. William Sizeler, in His Individual Capacity, et al. Nos. 2004-CA-2210, 2005-CA-1265. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. November 21, 2006. Rehearing Denied February 15, 2007.

616 P.2d 1368 (1980) Theodore B. JORDAN, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Mack H. HAMADA, Chairman, Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board; John E. Milligan and James K. Clark, Board Members of the Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board and the Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board, Appellees, and the Hawaii Government Employees' Association, Local 152, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Petitioner-Appellee. No. 6547. <

778 A.2d 482 (2001) 343 N.J. Super. 177 The MEDICAL CENTER AT PRINCETON and Princeton Medical Properties, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. The TOWNSHIP OF PRINCETON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, municipal agency of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant, and The Township of Princeton, municipal agency of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent, and Jenny Crumiller, Jon Crumiller, Anita Garoniak, Marc Mons

16‐1715‐cv Dufort v. City of New York, et al. 1 2 In the 3 United States Court of Appeals 4 For the Second Circuit 5 ________ 6 7 AUGUST TERM, 2016 8 9 ARGUED: MAY 3, 2017 10 DECIDED: OCTOBER 27, 2017 11

707 F.Supp. 782 (1989) STELLAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. Civ. A. No. 87-7109. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 3, 1989. *783 I. Michael Heine, Haddonfield, N.J., Robert A. Swift, Kohn, Savett, Klein & Graf, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. James E. Fox, Deputy Gen

ORDER ON PLAN C235 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, on behalf of the panel Before Circuit Judge SMITH, Chief District Judge GARCIA, and District Judge RODRIGUEZ This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ statutory and constitutional claims against Plan C235, enacted by the 83rd Texas Legislature in 2013. The following Plaintiffs assert

PER CURIAM.1 In 1989 Garry V. Giddens was injured while working for his employer, Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCS). The injury occurred when a chain attached to a crane broke causing a track assembly to fall on Giddens’ hand. Treatment for the hand injury included eight surgeries. Despite the treatment, Giddens was unable to return to work. He then filed suit against KCS under the Feder

202 B.R. 411 (1996) In re BURTON SECURITIES S.A., Debtor. TOR HUSJORD SHIPPING, Appellant, v. PORT ISABEL/SAN BENITO NAVIGATION DISTRICT, et al., Appellees. C.A. No. C-96-68. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. July 2, 1996. *412 *413

Watson, Judge: These suits have been submitted for decision on the following agreement between counsel for the respective parties: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the party hereto, subject to the approval of the court: That the items_marked “A” and initialed ES, RJK, CK, LS, AH (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner Emil Saby-Ray J.

311 S.E.2d 369 (1984) Thomas E. OATES and wife, Anita R. Oates v. JAG, INC. No. 8210SC1338. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 7, 1984. Brown & Johnson by C.K. Brown, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellants. Patterson, Dilthey, Clay, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog by Sanford W. Thompson, IV and John W. Liles, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellee

692 N.E.2d 1129 (1998) 181 Ill.2d 249 229 Ill.Dec. 918 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Juan CORTES, Appellant. No. 80149. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 23, 1998. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1998. *1132 John J. Hanlon, Asst. State Appellate Defe

OPINION AND ORDER Mark S. Davis, United States District Judge This Opinion and Order follows a ten day bench trial involving numerous disputes arising out of a maritime contract between East Coast Repair & Fabrication, LLC, (“ECR” or “Plaintiff’) and the United States of America, through the Department of the Navy, and its activity the Norfolk Ship Support Activity (hereinafter collectively “Defend

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc