⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Ehrbar v. Citigroup, Inc.”

District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-05-13 · Published · cited 4× · 104 F. Supp. 3d 599; 61 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1145; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63460; 2015 WL 2226291
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: During the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008, the price of Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) stock dropped precipitously. The Citigroup 401(k) Plan (the “Citigroup Plan”) and the Citibuilder 401(k) Plan for Puerto Rico (the “Citibuilder Plan”) required that the Plans include an option to allow employees to invest in the Citigroup Common Stock Fund, which is
District Court, E.D. New York · 2016-10-20 · Published · cited 21× · 216 F. Supp. 3d 275; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145462; 2016 WL 6126314
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This case arises from allegations by the Plaintiff Carol Arnold (the “Plaintiff’) that her employer, the Defendant, the Research Foundation for the State University of New York (the “Defendant RFSUNY’) discriminated against her in violation of the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (the “FMLA”), and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y.