Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 18 2017, 6:26 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

ORDER Gerald Elam appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

266 S.W.3d 889 (2008) Gerald ELAM, Appellant, v. Sheriff Robert DAWSON, Respondent. No. WD 68926. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 28, 2008. Gerald Elam, Cameron, MO, pro se. Robert Timothy Bickhaus, Macon, MO, for respondent. Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, P.J., PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge. O

245 S.W.3d 287 (2008) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Churon Emanual ELAM, Appellant. No. WD 67218. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. February 19, 2008. *288 Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, C.J., LISA WHIT

254 S.W.3d 50 (2008) Gerald ELAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. WD 67298. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 8, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied March 4, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied June 24, 2008. Mark Grothoff, Columbia for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, At

216 S.W.3d 251 (2007) Gerald M. ELAM, Appellant, v. Sheriff Robert DAWSON, Respondent. No. WD 67059. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 13, 2007. *252 Gerald R. Elam, Cameron, MO, Appellant pro se. R. Timothy Bickhaus, Prosecuting Attorney, Macon, MO, for Respondent. Before HOWARD, C.J., and ULRICH a

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2246 Doc: 31 Filed: 05/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2246 WILLIAM NILE ELAM, III, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEPHEN TIMOTHY EARLY; MICHAEL S. EARLY; SUZANNE J. EARLY, Defend

771 P.2d 597 (1989) 108 N.M. 268 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arvil Howard ELAM, a/k/a Howard Elam, Defendant-appellant. No. 10051. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. February 9, 1989. Certiorari Denied March 27, 1989. Jacquelyn Robins, Chief Public Defender, Wade H. Russell, Asst. Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, fo

[Cite as Elam v. Woodhawk Club Condominium, 2019-Ohio-457.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 107092 DEBRA ELAM PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs

106 P.3d 465 (2005) 141 Idaho 139 John P. HOWARD, Thomas H. Lopez and Michael E. Kelly, individually and as former members of Howard Ellsworth Ipsen Perry & Lopez, PLLC, a professional limited liability company, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross Appellants, v. Mark PERRY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Respondent, and John Does I-III, former members of Howard Ellsworth Ipsen Perry & Lopez PLLC, a professional limited lia

FARRELL, Associate Judge: In this certification of questions of law pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-723 (1989), we are asked to decide the following two related questions regarding the nature of an attorney’s charging lien under District of Columbia law arising from a contingent fee agreement between an attorney and client:1 1. Under District of Columbia common law, does

Order in Favor of Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, United States District Court Judge Plaintiff brings this action against defendant seeking review and vacatur of Award 14 (the “Award”) of Public Law Board 7680 (the “Board”), pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. sections 151 to 188, (the “RLA”). (Dkt. No. 7, FAC ¶ 1.) Specifically, plaintiff seeks review of th

273 S.E.2d 661 (1981) STATE of North Carolina v. Howard ELAM. No. 86. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 27, 1981. *663 Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by T. Buie Costen, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State. Singleton, Murray, Harlow & Little by James D. Little, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellant.

573 F.Supp. 797 (1983) Ralph ELAM, Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. C-3-82-182. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. May 11, 1983. *798 *799 Janet R. Sorrell, Toni M. Tell, Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiff. Kenneth R. Pohlman, Asst. Pros. Atty., Howard P. Kri

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Martha S. Elam sued Sonya Steele for personal injuries in federal district court here in the District of Columbia. On October 26, 1988, the parties arrived at a settlement under which Steele’s insurer, Government Employees Insurance Company, agreed to pa

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 1310, 86 N.M. 595, 526 P.2d 189 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.

68 Wis.2d 614 (1975) 229 N. W. 2d 664 STATE, Appellant, v. ELAM, Respondent. No. State 180. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued May 5, 1975. Decided June 3, 1975. *615 For the appellant there was a brief by Victor A. Miller, attorney general, and Robert D. Martinson, assistant

526 P.2d 189 (1974) 86 N.M. 595 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arvil Howard ELAM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1310. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. July 24, 1974. Certiorari Denied September 4, 1974. *191 James R. Toulouse, James R. Toulouse & Associates, P.A., Albuquerque, f

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00275-CV ___________________________ RICHARD A. WEBER, ERIC ELAM, AND JOE PALMER, Appellants V. FRANK FERNANDEZ, Appellee On Appeal from the 48th District Court Tarrant County, T

*302Opinion SPENCER, P. J. Introduction Defendant Javontie Elam appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of assault with intent to commit a sexual felony, forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 220), one count of misdemeanor or felony sexual battery (id., § 24