Cases

Opinion filed April 10, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-24-00277-CR ___________ ELIAS MARTINEZ III, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 104th District Court Ta

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Elias Martinez III, * From the 104th District Court of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 20114B. Vs. No. 11-24-00277-CR * April 10, 2025 The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-23-00183-CR ELIAS MARTINEZ-VARGAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-700-C

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00314-CR Ex parte Victor Elias Martinez FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 423-10172, THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION Victor Elias Martinez challenges the trial court’s denial of his app

JUSTICE GARCIA, dissenting: I am persuaded by Dr. Elias’s argument that the circuit court deviated from the Illinois Supreme Court’s holding in Neade v. Portes, 193 Ill. 2d 433, 739 N.E.2d 496 (2000), by admitting evidence, according to the plaintiffs own brief, that Dr. Elias had “a financial incentive for him to interpret the results of the discogram as an indication for the

922 N.E.2d 457 (2009) Thomas MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sarmed ELIAS, M.D., and Bone & Joint Center, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1-08-0265. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. December 28, 2009. As Corrected January 28, 2010. *459 John K. Hughes, Bernice Jacobs, Hughes Socol Pier

930 N.E.2d 410 (2010) 236 Ill.2d 507 MARTINEZ v. ELIAS. No. 109772. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 1, 2010. Disposition of Petition for Leave to Appeal[*] Denied. NOTES [*] For Cumulative Leave to Appeal Tables see preliminary pages of advance sheets and Annual Illinois Cumulative Leave to Appeal Table.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Petitioner Benjamin Elias’s “Petition for a *700Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody” (ECF No. 1) [hereinafter “Petition”], filed on December 28, 2015; Resp

Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered January 14, 2008, unanimously withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the stipulation of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.: Appellant, Richard Elias Martinez, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered April 5, 2013. After careful consideration, we vacate and remand. On May 30, 2012, Appellant was charged with thirteen counts of robbery, four counts of terroristic threats, three counts of theft by unlawful taking, three counts of receiving stolen property, one

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and arguments of counsel, for the reasons set forth below, the Court is of opinion that it does not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. On May 19, 2005, Oswaldo Elias Martinez (Martinez) was indicted in the Circuit Court of the City of Williamsburg and James City County, for two counts of capital murder, in violation of Code § 18.2-31, for events alleged to hav

GEE, Circuit Judge: Defendant Elias Martinez appeals his criminal conviction on the ground that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Martinez was tried on seven counts of distributing or conspiring to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and he was represented by retained counsel, Matias Morin. Among the witnesses against Martinez was Alonso Q

Opinion DAWSON, J. Rudy Elias Martinez appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault with a deadly weapon or by force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)).1 The jury found true a gang enhancement allegation (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1) [offense committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a c

*238 Opinion BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J. I. INTRODUCTION In May 2000, defendant Salvador Martinez, Jr., pleaded guilty to a charge that he committed a felony forgery in violation of Penal Code section 470, subdivision (a),

*1172 Opinion ELIA, J. By way of an information filed on December 20, 2011, the Monterey County District Attorney charged Gabriel Antonio Martinez (appellant) with one count of murder (Pen. Code, § 12022.7; count one, victim Lisa Groveman), one count of involuntary manslaughter (Pen

PER CURIAM.* Elias Martinez-Mata (“Martinez”) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. Martinez argues pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are elements of the offense, not sentence enhancements, making

NO. 07-03-0087-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 14, 2003 ______________________________ ELIAS A. MARTIN

NO. 07-03-0087-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 14, 2003 ______________________________ ELIAS A. MARTINEZ, APPELLANT V.

NO. 07-03-0087-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 14, 2003 ______________________________

504 F.Supp.2d 887 (2007) Victor MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, et al., Respondent. No. CV 06-7609 TJH AJW. United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. August 17, 2007. *888 *889 Ahilan T. Arulanantham, Peter J. Eliasberg, Ranjana Natarajan, Los Angeles, CA, Cec