⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Elizabeth A. Martin”

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
05/15/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 15, 2025 Session EMILY ELIZABETH BUCKNER v. COMPLETE WELLNESS CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradley County No. V-23-376 J. Michael Sharp, Judge
Cousar v. Martinpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 820 S.E.2d 131
DISMISSED.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 20, 2015 No. 04-15-00320-CV Jonathan SHURBERG as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rebecca Lord, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of La Salle Industries, a Limited Partnership, Appellant v.
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009-07-13 · Published · cited 6× · 674 F. Supp. 2d 822; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115560; 2009 WL 4799432
674 F.Supp.2d 822 (2009) Richard C. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. J.A.M. DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-298. United States District Court, E.D. Texas. July 13, 2009. *827 Melissa Ann Moore, Moore & Associates, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Dawn Rachelle Tezino, Elizabeth Brandes Pratt, and Morris C. Ca
Zook v. Martinpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2018-10-18 · Published · cited 3× · 557 S.W.3d 880
Karen R. Baker, Associate Justice Randy Zook, petitioner, challenges the sufficiency of a statewide-initiative petition. Respondent, the Honorable Mark Martin, Arkansas Secretary of State, certified the initiative entitled "An Act to Increase the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act," also known as "Issue No. 5," which is on the November 6, 2018 ballot. The proposed Act is sponsored by intervenor, Kristin Foster, Individually and on behalf of
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 14, 2015 No. 04-15-00320-CV Jonathan SHURBERG as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rebecca Lord, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of La Salle Industries, a Limited Partnership, Appellants v
Zook v. Martinpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2018-10-19 · Published · cited 5× · 558 S.W.3d 385
SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice Randy Zook, petitioner, challenges the sufficiency of the signatures certified by the respondent, the Honorable Mark Martin, Arkansas Secretary of State, in the statewide initiative ballot petition entitled "Arkansas Term Limits Amendment," which is on the November 6, 2018 ballot. The intervenor, Arkansas Term Limits, sponsored the petition. This court addresses the second issue raised in the orig
Martin v. the Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014-09-10 · Published · cited 1× · 329 Ga. App. 10; 763 S.E.2d 363
Miller, Judge. Marvlyn Martin, who pled guilty to first degree homicide by vehicle (OCGA § 40-6-393 (a)) and possession of an open container (OCGA § 40-6-253 (b) (1) (B)), appeals pro se from the trial court’s order denying his motion for out-of-time appeal. Martin contends that his plea was invalid because the indictment was defective and that his trial counsel was ineffective fo
Martin v. Byarspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-01-21 · Published · cited 0× · 589 F. App'x 217
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry W. Martin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Martin’s claims against all but one Defendant without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-09-03 · Published · cited 0× · 583 F. App'x 73
Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Donnell Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018-07-11 · Published · cited 11× · 894 F.3d 1356
Mayer, Circuit Judge. *1359 Hugh Martin, Sandra Knox-Martin, Kirkland Jones, Theron Maloy, and Sherilyn Maloy (collectively, "the Inholders") appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their claim alleging a Fifth Amendment taking as unripe. See
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017-06-27 · Published · cited 2× · 2017 ME 136; 166 A.3d 119
JABAR, J. [¶ 1] Arthur Murdock appeals from a summary judgment entered by the trial court (Cumberland County, Warren, J.) in favor of Martin Thorne and the Maine Department of Public Safety (DPS) on Murdock’s negligence claim against Thorne and his underinsured motorist claim against DPS. We affirm the judgment. I. BACKGROUND
Martin v. O'Rourkepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018-06-07 · Published · cited 82× · 891 F.3d 1338
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JOHN MARTIN, Claimant-Appellant v. PETER O’ROURKE, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WILLIAM RHODES, Claim
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016-03-10 · Published · cited 5× · 2016 ME 41; 135 A.3d 96; 2016 Me. LEXIS 41
PER CURIAM. [¶ 1] Arthur Murdock appeals, and the Maine Department of Public Safety (DPS) cross-appeals, from summary judgments entered by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Warren, J.) in favor of Mar *97 tin Thorne, on Murdock’s . complaint for negligence, and in favor of DP
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014-10-16 · Published · cited 8× · 2014 Ark. 429; 444 S.W.3d 855; 2014 Ark. LEXIS 543
Cite as 2014 Ark. 429 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-753 BRIAN RICHARDSON AND MARY Opinion Delivered October 16, 2014 DILLARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF CITIZENS FOR LOCAL ORIGINAL ACTION RIGHTS PETITIONERS PETITION DENIED. V. MARK MARTIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ARKANSAS SECRETARY OF S