⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Elizabeth Ann Andrade”

Andrade v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003-10-27 · Published · cited 20× · 588 S.E.2d 588; 356 S.C. 238; 2003 S.C. LEXIS 261
356 S.C. 238 (2003) 588 S.E.2d 588 June P. ANDRADE, Respondent, v. Jimmy JOHNSON, Sea Island Air, Inc., and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., Inc., Defendants, of whom SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO., INC. is Petitioner. No. 25738. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard March 4, 2003. Decided October 27, 2003.
Andrade v. Kuolulupublic domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-SEP-2024 02:30 PM Dkt. 32 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
Andrade v. Kuolulupublic domain
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2024-10-24 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-OCT-2024 07:56 AM Dkt. 48 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996-04-03 · Published · cited 24× · 934 F. Supp. 817; 1996 WL 408500
934 F.Supp. 817 (1996) Isabel G. ANDRADE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip J. CHOJNACKI, et al., Defendants. HOLUB, et al. v. RENO, et al. FERGUSON, et al. v. RENO, et al. BROWN, et al. v. U.S.[1] RIDDLE, et al. v. RENO, et al. GYARFAS, et al. v. U.S. MARTIN v. U.S. HOLUB, et al. v. U.S. BROWN, et al. v. U.S. Civil Action
Andrade v. Kuolulupublic domain
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2024-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 04-JUN-2024 08:01 AM Dkt. 326 MO NOS. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
District Court, W.D. Texas · 1999-07-01 · Published · cited 9× · 65 F. Supp. 2d 431; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16349; 1999 WL 528848
65 F.Supp.2d 431 (1999) Isabel G. ANDRADE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Phillip J. CHOJNACKI, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. W-96-CA-139 to W-96-CA-147, W-96-CA-373. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Waco Division. July 1, 1999. *432 *433 *434 <
District Court, E.D. Texas · 1998-03-02 · Published · cited 11× · 996 F. Supp. 605; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2549; 1998 WL 94478
996 F.Supp. 605 (1998) Mercedes ANDRADE GARCIA, Maria Teresa Galvan De Garcia, The Estate of Juan Antonio Garcia, Blanca Garcia Rojas Gregoriedes, Teresa Elizabeth Garcia Rojas, Maria Guadalupe Garcia Valdes, Yolanda Valdes Esquivel, As Next Friend of Juan Antonio Garcia Valdes, a Minor, Plaintiffs, v. COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF SHERMAN, and Bradley G. Christianson, D.O., Defendants. No. 3:97-CV-18. Un
Andrade v. Ellefsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985-12-30 · Published · cited 4× · 375 N.W.2d 828
OPINION FOLEY, Judge. The parents and guardians of two minor children sued Anoka County for negligence in supervising, inspecting and recommending licensing of the day care home where their infants were seriously injured. Appellants also sued the day care operators for their negligent operation, care and control of the facility. The county moved for summary judgment arguing: (1) it is immune from liability
Andrade v. Ellefsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986-08-15 · Published · cited 32× · 391 N.W.2d 836; 68 A.L.R. 4th 245; 1986 Minn. LEXIS 860
SIMONETT, Justice. This case raises issues of tort liability and governmental immunity for a county’s role in state licensure of day care facilities. We conclude a tort duty of care is owed the plaintiffs and that the county has governmental immunity which, however, has been waived to the extent of the county’s liability insurance. For the reasons set out, we affirm in part and reverse in part the court of appeals’ decision.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-10-17 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued October 17, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00985-CV ——————————— ELIZABETH C. PEREZ, Appellant V. SYLVESTER TURNER, MAYOR, KARUN SREERAMA, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000-01-19 · Published · cited 501× · 202 F.3d 234; 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1511; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 683; 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,211; 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1391; 2000 WL 37744
OPINION MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: Elizabeth Smith appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of First Union National Bank on Smith’s claims for sexual harassment under Title VII, sexual harassment under N.C. GEN. STAT. § 143^22.2, retaliation under Title VII, negligent supervision or retention, and a Fair Labor Standards Act
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2025-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 12-JUN-2025 08:21 AM Dkt. 15 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ____
PACK v. STATEpublic domain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014-07-15 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 OK 66; 330 P.3d 1216; 2014 WL 3437783; 2014 Okla. LEXIS 90
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM: 11 Having considered the application to assume original jurisdiction, petition for a writ, and request for declaratory relief along with the response thereto, the associated briefs of the parties, and all amici and other filings in the cause, THE COURT DETERMINES THAT: 1) We have jurisdiction over the
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2025-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 15-MAY-2025 08:45 AM Dkt. 106 ODSLJ NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
PACK v. STATEpublic domain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014-07-15 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 OK 66
OSCN Found Document:PACK v. STATE OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help <
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019-05-31 · Published · cited 4× · 386 F. Supp. 3d 635
T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiff, a United States citizen born in El Salvador, brings this action seeking to recover damages for the Department of Homeland Security's ("DHS") decision to arrest, detain, and remove plaintiff based on an erroneous determination in 2004 that plaintiff was not entitled to derivative citizenship. At issue are defendant's motions (i) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdicti
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997-01-08 · Published · cited 110× · 104 F.3d 472; 1997 WL 3276
STAHL, Circuit Judge. After being struck and injured by a rolling automobile, plaintiff-appellant Elizabeth V. Bogosian commenced this diversity action in Rhode Island District Court alleging strict product liability, negligence and breach of warranty against Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (“Mercedes-Benz”) and Daimler-Benz North America Corporation.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-10-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Defendant. FINDING OF LIABILITY For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion, the Court hereby GRANTS the plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment. Specifically, the Court holds as follows: 1. As to Count I, defendant the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) is LIABLE to the following plaintiffs: (1) Steven Vernier, Jr.; (2
Garcia v. Brockwaypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-05-13 · Published · cited 92× · 526 F.3d 456; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10253; 2008 WL 2024996
526 F.3d 456 (2008) Noll GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Intervenor-Appellee, v. Dennis BROCKWAY; Robert Stewart; Stewart Miles & Associates, Defendants-Appellees, and J.J. Zavoshy; Y.W. Zavoshy; H & H Properties; Zavoshy Rev. Inter Vivos Trust, Defendants. Tamara Thompson; Disabled Rights Action Committee, (a Utah non-profit corporation), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gohres Construction
In re Cantupublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016-07-14 · Published · cited 4× · 553 B.R. 565; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2585; 2016 WL 3982881
MEMORANDUM OPINION Brian F. Kenney, United States Bankruptcy Judge This case comes before the Court on: (a) the Chapter 13 Trustee’s Objections to the Debtor’s claim of exemptions (Amended Schedule C); and (b) the Chapter 13 Trustee’s Objections to the Debtor’s Amended Plan. The Court sustains the Trustee’s Objections to the Debtor’s claim of exemptions and overrules the Trustee’s Objections to the Debtor’s