⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Elizabeth Ann Fincham”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-09-15 · Published · cited 43× · 621 F.3d 781; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19254
621 F.3d 781 (2010) In re AURORA DAIRY CORP. ORGANIC MILK MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. *782 Kristine Mothershead, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Leonie Lloyd, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. Aurora Organic Dairy, doing business as Aurora Organic Dairy; Quality Assurance International, Inc.; Case Vander Eyk, Jr., doing b
Gant v. Gantpublic domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1985-04-12 · Published · cited 32× · 329 S.E.2d 106; 174 W. Va. 740; 53 A.L.R. 4th 1; 1985 W. Va. LEXIS 542
329 S.E.2d 106 (1985) Elizabeth Elana GANT v. Frank Larry GANT. No. 16590. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. April 12, 1985. *109 Michael T. Clifford, Leo Catsonis, Charleston, for appellant. Lewis, Ciccarello, Masinter & Friedberg, Arthur T. Ciccarello, Charleston, for appellee.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999-03-05 · Published · cited 4× · 174 F.3d 1087; 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1703; 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1073; 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3454
174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 174 F.3d 1087
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge. Terry A. Garvin, et al., (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT & T) on their claims to recover termination allowances brought pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). Facts Appellant