Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Elizabeth Byer Leonard”
in Re Rino-K&K Compression, Inc.public domain
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT In re Rino-K&K Compression, Inc., * Original Mandamus Proceeding No. 11-22-00279-CV * November 21, 2022 * Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J.
Ex Parte Alvin Ryalspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00296-CR EX PARTE Alvin RYALS Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Ch
in Re Rino-K&K Compression, Inc.public domain
Opinion filed November 21, 2022 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00279-CV __________ IN RE RINO-K&K COMPRESSION, INC. Original Mandamus Proceeding OPINION Relator, Rino-K&K Compression, Inc., filed this original petition for writ of mandamus
OPINION HARBISON, Justice. In this action the beneficiaries of an inter vivos trust, created in 1949, sued the trustee for damages. They alleged that the trustee breached its fiduciary duty to advise them fully concerning transactions in 1944 involving shares of corporate stock which the beneficiaries transferred to the trust in 1956. This suit was begun in 1977. It is a sequel to and an outgrowth of earl
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
201 F.Supp.2d 145 (2002) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 17, 2002. *146 Keith M. Harper, Lorna K. Babby, Dennis Marc Gingold, Washington, DC, Elliot H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stoc
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
260 F.Supp.2d 93 (2003) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 28, 2003. *94 Keith M. Harper, Native American Rights Fund, Washington, DC, Elliott H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton
DATE: 08/05/2014 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:36:36 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312013 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED ______________________________________________________
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
223 F.Supp.2d 156 (2002) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.96-1285-RCL. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 30, 2002. *157 Keith M. Harper, Lorna K. Babby, Dennis Marc Gingold, Elliot H. Levitas, Washington, DC, for Plai
Taylor v. Steelepublic domain
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before me upon the petition of Missouri state prisoner Leonard Taylor for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 19). After carefully considering Taylor's petition, Respondent's brief (Doc. 29), the underlying record (Doc. 29, Ex. A-
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
231 F.Supp.2d 315 (2002) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 12, 2002. *316 Keith M. Harper, Lorna K. Babby, Dennis Marc Gingold, Elliot H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, W
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
319 F.Supp.2d 36 (2004) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Civ.A. No. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 27, 2004. *37 *38 Dennis M. Gingold, Elliott H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton, LL
787 N.W.2d 523 (2010) EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, Appellant, v. U-HAUL COMPANY OF MINNESOTA a/k/a U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, et al., Respondents, Randall J. Quam, et al., Respondents, Larson Training Services, Inc., d/b/a Larson's Automotive Repair Services, Respondents, Minnesota's Credit Union, et al., Irma L. Parranto, et al., Jamal D. Ansari, et al., Respondents Below. No. A08-767.
State v. Hansenpublic domain
989 P.2d 338 (1999) 1999 MT 253 The STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Chris Leonard HANSEN, Defendant and Appellant. No. 97-342. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs December 17, 1998. Decided October 21, 1999. *340 William F. Hooks, Appellate Defender Office, Helena,
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Stacey v. City of Hermitagepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Raymond Stacey appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissing a civil rights action filed by him and his mother, Helen Stacey, who is now deceased, after the City of Hermitage demolished Helen Stacey’s home. On November 24, 2004, we entered a judgment affirming in part and vacating in part the District Court’s order
Rodriguez v. Weprinpublic domain
MURTHA, District Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Robert Rodriguez appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Weinstein, /., denying his claims for relief arising from the alleged unconstitutional delay in state appellate review of his felony convictions. Because we agree that the appellant is not entitled to the relief he seeks, we affirm the judgment of the district co
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
260 F.Supp.2d 110 (2003) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 28, 2003. *113 Keith M. Harper, Native American Rights Fund, Washington, DC, Elliott H. Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockt
Rodriguez v. Weprinpublic domain
116 F.3d 62 Robert RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Earle F. WEPRIN, Defendant,andCharles J. Hynes; Elizabeth Holtzman; Jane Sutley; MartinH. Brownstein, John Doe; David M. Epstein; JackJordan; Peter A. Weinstein;Defendants-Appellees. No. 15, Docket 95-2416. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Submitted April 1, 1997.Decid
Cobell v. Nortonpublic domain
231 F.Supp.2d 295 (2002) Elouise Pepion COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.96-1285(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 12, 2002. *296 Keith M. Harper, Lorna K. Babby, Native American Rights Fund, Washington, DC, Dennis Marc Gingold