Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Elizabeth Gallegos”
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Gallegospublic domain
Opinion CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: {1 Salt Lake City Corporation (the City) petitions for judicial review of the Salt Lake City Civil Service Commission's (the Commission) decision reversing the termination of Officer Thomas Gallegos's employment with the Salt Lake City Police Department (the Department). Because the Commission applied an incorrect legal standard, we s
State v. Gallegospublic domain
2020 UT App 162 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. DARRIN JAMES GALLEGOS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190029-CA Filed December 10, 2020 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Elizabeth Hruby-Mills
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Defendant-Appellee Elizabeth E., at all times relevant to this appeal, was a student in the Jefferson County, Colorado school system with substantial behavioral and emotional issues for which she required special education under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEA” or the “Act”), 20 U.S.C. § 1
Gallegos v. Frezzapublic domain
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: _______________ 3 Filing Date: March 19, 2015 4 NOS. 32,605 & 32,606 (Consolidated) 5 FERNANDO GALLEGOS, 6 Plaintiff-Appellant, 7 v. 8 ELDO FREZZA, M.D., 9 Defendant-Appellee, 10 and 11 PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH PLAN, INC., 12 A New Mexico Domestic For-Profit Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 Consolidated With 15 NELLIE GONZALES, 16 Plaintiff-Appellant, 17 v. 18 ELDO FREZZA, M.
State v. Lori Elizabeth Lovelypublic domain
HUSKEY, Judge. Lori Elizabeth Lovely appeals from the district court’s judgment of conviction arguing that her motion to suppress was improperly denied. We affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Lovely was travelling from Portland, Oregon, to Minneapolis, Minnesota, when the Greyhound bus she was on
McNear v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ex rel. Certificateholders of Securitized Asset Banked Receivables, LLCpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Rosena McNear, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint against defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-FF8 Mortgage Pass through Certificate Series 2004 FF8 (“Wells Fargo Trustee”) (collectively, the “Wells Farg
Garcia v. Crossmark, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Crossmark, Inc.’s (“Cross-mark”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 81] and Crossmark’s Motion in Limine [Doc. 83]. The Court, having considered the Motions, briefs, relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that both the Motion for Partial Summ
Terry v. Gallegospublic domain
926 F.Supp. 679 (1996) Joseph Ray TERRY, Plaintiff, v. Tony E. GALLEGOS, Chairman of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendant. No. 92-2729-MI/A. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee. May 16, 1996. *680 *681 *682
National Education Ass'n v. Santa Fe Public Schoolspublic domain
OPINION KENNEDY, Judge. {1} This case requires us to interpret certain provisions of the School Personnel Act. We hold that the “harmless error” provision of NMSA 1978 Section 22-10A-28(L) (2003) applies to allow the late filing of a notice requesting a hearing on a discharge notice, under Section 22-10A-27(B). We therefore
Rolando Olvera, United States District Judge Before the Court is San Benito Consolidated Independent School District's ("Defendant") "Defendant San Benito Consolidated Independent School District's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted" ("Defendant's MTD") (Docket No. 7). E.M., through his best next friend and mother Monica Guerra ("Ms. Guerra") (collectively "Plaintiff"), timely filed "[Pla
Martin v. McDonnoldpublic domain
247 S.W.3d 224 (2006) Elizabeth Robison MARTIN and Roy G. Martin, Jr., Appellants, v. Kyle H. McDONNOLD and Hollyce H. McDonnold, Appellees. No. 08-05-00301-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. December 7, 2006. Rehearing Overruled July 25, 2007. *227 Pete P. Gallego, Alpine, for Appellants. M. McDonnol
Resource Associates Grant Writing & Evaluation Services, Inc. v. Southampton Union Free School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Southampton Union Free School District, a New York School District’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or to Transfer Venue, filed December 17, 2015 (Doc. 5)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on March 8, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has per
United States v. Elizabeth Marie Morse Thompsonpublic domain
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge: Joseph James Stratton appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment. He also maintains that the District Court committed reversible error in denying his motion for a severance, and in refusing to grant hi
Bird v. McCauley (In re McCauley)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL TENA CAMPBELL, District Judge. This appeal arises from the Chapter 7 bankruptcy of Eugene V. McCauley, Jr. When Mr. McCauley filed his bankruptcy petition, he and his wife, Elizabeth, were living on a ranch in Ballard, Utah (“the Ballard property”). Record title to the Ballard property was held by R.E. McCau-ley, LLC (REM), an LLC formed by Mr. McCauley’s mo
Vick v. Floresville Independent School Districtpublic domain
OPINION Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice Larry A. Vick and Linda H. Vick (the Vicks) challenge the trial court’s orders granting the pleas to the jurisdiction filed by Floresville Independent School District; City of Floresville; Wilson County; Line-barger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP; Rashay K. Chapa; and Wilson County Appraisal District. Because we have jurisdiction in this appeal, the Vicks’ pleadings affir
State v. Bonillaspublic domain
3 P.3d 1016 (1999) 197 Ariz. 96 The STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Jaime Damian BONILLAS, Appellee. No. 2 CA-CR 99-0137. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B. November 9, 1999. Review Denied September 26, 2000. Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney by Elizabeth Tyszko, Tucson, for Appellant. Law Office
Bird v. McCauley (In re McCauley)public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON REMAND R. KIMBALL MOSIER, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before this Court on the United States District Court’s order remanding the case for further proceedings (Remand Order) consistent with the Dis*405trict Court’s memorandum decision and order of September 18,2015. I. PROC
OPINION David Puryear, Justice Los Fresnos, .Consolidated. Independent School District and the Commissioner of Education appeal the district court’s final judgment reversing the Commissioner’s order upholding the School District’s decision not to renew appellee Jorge Vazquez’s term teaching contract, The School District’s Board of Trustees c
Bird v. McCauley (In re McCauley)public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW R. KIMBALL MOSIER, Bankruptcy Judge. On March 19, 2014, the Court commenced the trial in this adversary proceeding. The trial continued through March 20, 2014, and on March 21, 2014, the Court made its ruling from the bench. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law augment any findings and conclusions stated by the Court during the hearing of March 21,
Doe ex rel. Doe v. Northside I.S.D.public domain
ORDER XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge. On this day came on to be considered Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 49), Defendants’ motion to exclude expert testimony (doc. no. 51), and Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions (doc. no. 52). Background Sarah Doe was a middle school student in a Northside I.S.D. school.1 Nora Martinez