⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Elizabeth Kelly Scruggs Downing”

State v. Pickettpublic domain
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007-01-22 · Published · cited 95× · 211 S.W.3d 696; 2007 Tenn. LEXIS 10; 2007 WL 148651
211 S.W.3d 696 (2007) STATE of Tennessee v. Kelly Michael PICKETT. and State of Tennessee v. Gregory T. Harwood. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 4, 2006 Session. January 22, 2007. *699 Mark C. Scruggs, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kelly Michael Pickett. Jodie A. Bell and Wendy S. T
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016-03-30 · Published · cited 10× · 179 F. Supp. 3d 179; 2016 WL 1257819; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42090
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Michael P. Shea, United States District Judge. Plaintiff John Doe filed a fourteen-count amended complaint against the Torrington Board of Education and several of its employees alleging violations of the following federal laws: the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment under 42 .U.S.C. § 1983 (Counts One and Two); the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendmen
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-09-27 · Published · cited 22× · 815 F. Supp. 2d 753; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109601; 2011 WL 4472179
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Tashana Chambers (“Tashana”) and Lawrence Chambers (collectively, “Plain*756tiffs”) bring this action against North Rockland Central School District (“the District”), North Rockland Central School District Board of Education (“the Board”), and individual Defendants Dodge R. Watkins (“Wa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2009-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 2, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MULLANDRIC WEBB Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-06789 Lee V. Coffee, Judge No. W2008-00094-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 16, 2009 The defendant, Mullandric Webb, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of t
District Court, D. Delaware · 2018-08-24 · Published · cited 3× · 323 F. Supp. 3d 566
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE *572BACKGROUND This is a Hatch-Waxman Act case. The plaintiffs, Pernix Ireland Pain DAC and Pernix Therapeutics, LLC, (collectively, "Pernix") have sued the defendant, Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. ("Alvogen") for patent infringement under
State v. Doyle Hartpublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JUNE SESSION, 1997 FILED STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9612-CC-00451 ) September 10, 1997 Appellee, ) ) Cecil Crowson, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1130 Doc: 142 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 68 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1078 B.P.J., by her next friend and mother; HEATHER JACKSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; HARRISON COUNTY B
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 11× · 98 F.4th 542
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1078 Doc: 187 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 68 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1078 B.P.J., by her next friend and mother; HEATHER JACKSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; HARRISON COUNTY B
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PRESTON HOLLOW CAPITAL LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0169-SG ) NUVEEN LLC, NUVEEN ) INVESTMENTS, INC., NUVEEN ) SECURITIES LLC, and NUVEEN ) ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC,
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002-03-08 · Published · cited 3× · 191 F. Supp. 2d 1292; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4547; 2002 WL 416891
191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II
District Court, D. Delaware · 2012-07-19 · Published · cited 2× · 882 F. Supp. 2d 643; 2012 WL 2951367; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100567
MEMORANDUM GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this consolidated patent infringement action, plaintiffs Pfizer Inc., Warner-Lambert Company, L.L.C., C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V., and Northwestern University (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) allege that pharmaceutical products proposed by defendants Actavis Elizabeth, L.L.C., Actavis, Inc., Alphapharm
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-30 · Published · cited 85× · 600 U.S. 570
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 570–640 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 30, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014-02-27 · Published · cited 3× · 999 F. Supp. 2d 690; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25078; 2014 WL 793129
OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge: This case involves complex retrocessional agreements between Plaintiff Munich Reinsurance America Inc. (“Munich”) and Defendant American National Insurance Company (“ANICO”). Munich filed a Complaint alleging breach of contract for ANICO’s refusal to pay certain claims submitted for payment by Munich under the parties’ agreements, and in response, ANI-CO filed a countercla
Holmes v. Godinezpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 35× · 311 F.R.D. 177; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137388; 2015 WL 5920750
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge Plaintiffs, eleven deaf or hard of hearing prisoners, brought this proposed class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Defendant Salvador A. Godinez, the Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC” or the “Department”). Plaintiffs allege that IDOC has denied them hearing accommodat
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-09-04 · Published · cited 11× · 766 F.3d 648; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17294; 2014 WL 4359059
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Indiana and Wisconsin are among the shrinking majority of states that do not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages, whether contracted in these states or in states (or foreign countries) where they are lawful. The states have appealed from district court decisions invalidating the states’ laws that ordain such refusal.
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930-06-10 · Published · cited 16× · 153 S.E. 640; 157 S.C. 85; 1930 S.C. LEXIS 143
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 87 June 10, 1930. The opinion of the Court was delivered by To avoid some repetition, the issues made by the pleadings in this cause, and the facts developed by the evidence therein, are referred to later, in our consideration of the questions raised by the appeal. The cause was first heard by Hoyt McMillan, Es
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894-02-05 · Published · cited 1× · 124 Mo. 223; 25 S.W. 229; 1894 Mo. LEXIS 284
Alexander Martin, Special Judge. These separate actions were commenced in April, 1882, under section 2121 of the Revised Statutes of 1879, which constitutes section 4425 of the Revised Statutes of 1889, in behalf of widows to recover damages for the death of their husbands, charged to have been caused by the negligence of appellant, a railway company, in operating and managing its train of cars, while they were being carried upon