Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Elizabeth Kelly Scruggs Downing”
State v. Pickettpublic domain
211 S.W.3d 696 (2007) STATE of Tennessee v. Kelly Michael PICKETT. and State of Tennessee v. Gregory T. Harwood. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 4, 2006 Session. January 22, 2007. *699 Mark C. Scruggs, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kelly Michael Pickett. Jodie A. Bell and Wendy S. T
Doe v. Torrington Board of Educationpublic domain
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Michael P. Shea, United States District Judge. Plaintiff John Doe filed a fourteen-count amended complaint against the Torrington Board of Education and several of its employees alleging violations of the following federal laws: the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment under 42 .U.S.C. § 1983 (Counts One and Two); the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendmen
Chambers v. North Rockland Central School Districtpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Tashana Chambers (“Tashana”) and Lawrence Chambers (collectively, “Plain*756tiffs”) bring this action against North Rockland Central School District (“the District”), North Rockland Central School District Board of Education (“the Board”), and individual Defendants Dodge R. Watkins (“Wa
State of Tennessee v. Mullandric Webbpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 2, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MULLANDRIC WEBB Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-06789 Lee V. Coffee, Judge No. W2008-00094-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 16, 2009 The defendant, Mullandric Webb, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of t
Pernix Ir. Pain Dac v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.public domain
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE *572BACKGROUND This is a Hatch-Waxman Act case. The plaintiffs, Pernix Ireland Pain DAC and Pernix Therapeutics, LLC, (collectively, "Pernix") have sued the defendant, Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. ("Alvogen") for patent infringement under
State v. Doyle Hartpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JUNE SESSION, 1997 FILED STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9612-CC-00451 ) September 10, 1997 Appellee, ) ) Cecil Crowson, Jr.
B.P.J. v. WV Secondary School Activities Commissionpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1130 Doc: 142 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 68 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1078 B.P.J., by her next friend and mother; HEATHER JACKSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; HARRISON COUNTY B
B.P.J. v. West Virginia State Board of Educationpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1078 Doc: 187 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 68 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1078 B.P.J., by her next friend and mother; HEATHER JACKSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; HARRISON COUNTY B
Preston Hollow Capital LLC v. Nuveen LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PRESTON HOLLOW CAPITAL LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0169-SG ) NUVEEN LLC, NUVEEN ) INVESTMENTS, INC., NUVEEN ) SECURITIES LLC, and NUVEEN ) ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC,
Household Bank v. JFS GROUPpublic domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II
Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this consolidated patent infringement action, plaintiffs Pfizer Inc., Warner-Lambert Company, L.L.C., C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V., and Northwestern University (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) allege that pharmaceutical products proposed by defendants Actavis Elizabeth, L.L.C., Actavis, Inc., Alphapharm
303 Creative LLC v. Elenispublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 570–640 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 30, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge: This case involves complex retrocessional agreements between Plaintiff Munich Reinsurance America Inc. (“Munich”) and Defendant American National Insurance Company (“ANICO”). Munich filed a Complaint alleging breach of contract for ANICO’s refusal to pay certain claims submitted for payment by Munich under the parties’ agreements, and in response, ANI-CO filed a countercla
Holmes v. Godinezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge Plaintiffs, eleven deaf or hard of hearing prisoners, brought this proposed class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Defendant Salvador A. Godinez, the Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC” or the “Department”). Plaintiffs allege that IDOC has denied them hearing accommodat
Virginia Wolf v. Scott Walkerpublic domain
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Indiana and Wisconsin are among the shrinking majority of states that do not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages, whether contracted in these states or in states (or foreign countries) where they are lawful. The states have appealed from district court decisions invalidating the states’ laws that ordain such refusal.
Temple v. Montgomerypublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 87 June 10, 1930. The opinion of the Court was delivered by To avoid some repetition, the issues made by the pleadings in this cause, and the facts developed by the evidence therein, are referred to later, in our consideration of the questions raised by the appeal. The cause was first heard by Hoyt McMillan, Es
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
Berry v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.public domain
Alexander Martin, Special Judge. These separate actions were commenced in April, 1882, under section 2121 of the Revised Statutes of 1879, which constitutes section 4425 of the Revised Statutes of 1889, in behalf of widows to recover damages for the death of their husbands, charged to have been caused by the negligence of appellant, a railway company, in operating and managing its train of cars, while they were being carried upon