Cases

Hon. Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge In 2014, Plaintiff Ebonia Elliott-Lewis sued her former employer, Abbott Laboratories, Inc. ("Abbott"). Her qui tam action alleged violations of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b, and

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by the County of Suffolk in New York in this multi-district litigation involving allegations of fraud against various pharmaceutical companies.1 Suffolk alleges that Defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers have fraudulently inflated th

60 F.Supp.2d 642 (1999) Michelle PLUMB, Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Kevin Ruse, Defendants. No. 97-CV-60306-AA. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 22, 1999. *643 Julia Sherwin, Detroit, MI, for plaintiff. Camille S. Miller, Lewis & Munday, Detroit, MI, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District - Judge: Background On June 26, 2014, Don Estep, a citizen of Texas, sued the following entities in Illinois state court: 1) AbbVie Inc. & Abbott Laboratories (collectively AbbVie), whose principal place of business is in Illinois; 2) Pharmacia & Upjohn Co., Inc., whose principal place of business is in

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Justice SAYLOR. This case is among a number of civil actions brought by state attorneys general against pharmaceutical companies nationwide challenging the propriety of prescription drug pricing, in particular, as it impacts third-party reimbursement for brand-name drug purchases subsidized by government social welfare programs. The Commonwealth has ce

Justice BAER, concurring. I concur in the Court’s order vacating the Commonwealth Court’s order and remanding for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. TAP Pharm. Prods. Inc., — Pa.-, 94 A.8d 350, 2014 WL 2728008 (Pa.2014) (Baer, J. concurring)(indieating my view that a remand is warranted for further consideration of the case in light of the OAJC’s analysis of the rebate

*194MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The States of Montana and Nevada allege that pharmaceutical manufacturers fraudulently overstate the published “average wholesale prices” (“AWP’s”) of many of their prescription drugs to the detriment of the States, which reimburse providers based on AWP’s, and their ci

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Security National Bank .of Sioux City, Iowa, acting as conservator for minor J.M.K., brought this products liability action against Abbott Laboratories, alleging *938 that Abbott’s baby formula caused permanent brain damage to J.M.K. After the trial jury found in favor of Abbo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JEFFERY J. SHELDON and ANDRAS § KONYA, M.D., PH.D., § § Plaintiffs-Below, § No. 81, 2019 Appellants, § § v. § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware PINTO TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, § L.P., PINTO TV ANNEX FUND, L.P

517 F.Supp.2d 776 (2007) Travis ORANGE, Plaintiff, v. Audrey FIELDING, Sergeant; Antron Lewis, Officer; Willie Winns, Officer; Lane Cribb, Sheriff of Georgetown County; and Michael Schwartz, Jail Administrative Director of the Georgetown County Detention Center, Defendants. C.A. No. 0:06-2601-PMD-BM. United States District Court, D. South Carolina. July 24, 2007. Tr

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JEFFERY J. SHELDON and ANDRAS ) KONYA, M.D., PH.D., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0838-MTZ ) PINTO TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, L.P., ) PINTO TV ANNEX FUND, L.P., PTV ) SCIENCES II, L.P., RIVERVEST VENTURE ) FUND

[Cite as State ex rel. Republic Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2014-Ohio-312.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, ex rel. : Republic Services, Inc., : Relator, : No. 13AP-219 v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION GOLDBERG, District Judge. Plaintiff, John Byars, has brought suit against Defendants, the School District of Philadelphia (“School District”), the School Reform Commission (“SRC”) and numerous School District employees,1 alleging various causes of action arising from events and ensuing publicity surrounding the School District’s award of a $7.5 mi

125 F.Supp.2d 1378 (2000) Michael POORE & Bruce Bias, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN-AMICABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF TEXAS, Defendant. No. CV 498-259. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division. December 20, 2000. John E. Suthers, John E. Suthers, PC, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiffs. Lew

Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY SCOTT FEINERMAN, United States District Judge Yelena Levitin and Chicago Surgical Clinic, Ltd. (“CSC”), bring federal antitrust claims, a hostile work environment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and several state law claims against Northwest Community Hospital (“NCH”), Advanced Surgical Associates, S

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AKORN, INC., ) ) Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018–0300–JTL ) FRESENIUS KABI AG, ) QUERCUS ACQUISITION, INC., and ) FRESENIUS

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge, dissenting: I most respectfully dissent. I cannot do so on the basis of the majority’s completely accurate statement of the law, but rather, solely on the basis of their application of the law to the facts of this case and those of the related appeals.1 While I *137often defer to the judgment of my learned

278 N.J. Super. 249 (1994) 650 A.2d 1012 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. GERALD SCHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 16, 1994. Decided December 23, 1994. *253 Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ARIEL A. RO

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: Vineland Chemical Company (ViChem) petitions this court to review the determination made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) that ViChem had not satisfied the relevant certification requirements under the Resource Conservation and Recover