Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. Plaintiff Lori Ellis brings the above-captioned action against Defendant Century 21 Department Stores, alleging claims of gender discrimination based on failure to promote and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Ex

Munson, J. Glacier Sales appeals a judgment of $13,210.09 based on a jury verdict in favor of Century 21 Products, Inc. Glacier argues the trial court erred (1) in submitting the question of the validity of an oral guaranty to the jury; (2) in refusing to give its proposed jury instruction on mitigation of damages; and (3) if the guaranty should be valid, in failing to discharge its obligation because Century 21 impaired its col

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS PHYLLIS. J- HAMILTON, District Judge On August 5, 2015, this matter came on for hearing before the court on the follow*930ing motions filed by defendants Purvis Lamar Ellis, ■ Deante Terrance Kincaid, Damien Edward McDaniel, and Joseph Pennymon: motion for a bill of particulars filed by Ellis (doc. no. 83); motion for a

133 Cal.Rptr.2d 367 (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 110 Cosme BASURCO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. Felicitas Frew et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. 21st Century Casualty Company, Defendant and Respondent. No. B156776. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One. April 3, 2003.</

370 F.Supp.2d 504 (2005) Kimberly A. ENGLAND, et al v. NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, et al Michael Klas, et al v. New Century Financial Corporation, et al No. CIV.A.03-360-B-M1, No. CIV.A.04-216-B-M1. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. April 26, 2005. *505 Gregory J. Miller, Baton Rouge, LA, Patrick Wa

Dannehy, J. This appeal and reserved question present two primary issues: (1) whether the statute of limitations in effect when these offenses occurred imposes a five year limitation on the prosecution of capital felonies; and (2) whether the state must join in a single prosecution all discrete statutory offenses arising from a single criminal transaction. In May, 1974, the badly decomposed body of seventeen ye

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 31 2018, 5:52 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

1 F.3d 1246NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.GELSON'S MARKETS; Arden-Mayfair, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55094. United

OPINION BOGGS, Chief Judge. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (“Fox”) appeals following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Murray Hill Publications, Inc. (“Murray Hill”), in its action for copyright infringement. During the creation of the movie “Jingle All The Way” (“JATW”), Fox received from Murray Hill

ERVIN, Circuit Judge. Jefferey Dale Ellis, administrator of the estate of his wife, Margaret Ann Ellis, appeals from the district court’s denial of a motion for a new trial. Margaret Ellis, a user of Playtex tampons, died unexpectedly in May of 1981. Convinced his wife had died from toxic shock syndrome (TSS), and that the TSS had bee

257 F.Supp. 564 (1966) Michael E. ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, a municipal corporation, and Mayor C. H. Sonneveldt, Leonard Anderson, Bernard Barto, Edward C. McCobb, Berton Sevensma, Joseph Sypniewski and William Worst, Commissioners for the City of Grand Rapids, and Donald O'Keefe, Urban Renewal Director for the City of Grand Rapids, and John Paul Jones, Planning Director for the City of Grand Rapids, individually and as officers,

61 F.2d 830 (1932) MAY DEPARTMENT STORES CO. v. BELL. No. 9453. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. November 12, 1932. *831 Ralph T. Finley, of St. Louis, Mo. (James C. Jones, Lon O. Hocker, Frank H. Sullivan, and Frank Y. Gladney, all of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellant. William H. Allen, of St. Louis, M

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE PLS.COM, LLC, a California No. 21-55164 limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-04790- v. JWH-RAO THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS; BRIGHT MLS, INC.; OPINION MIDWEST REAL ESTATE DATA,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-2895 _____________ IN RE: NIASPAN ANTITRUST LITIGATION A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan; City of Providence, Rhode Island; Electrical Workers 242 and 294 Health & Welfare Fund; International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund

North Carolina ex rel. Stein v. Bowen, 2022 NCBC 64. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION DURHAM COUNTY 21 CVS 3727 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. JOSHUA H. STEIN, Attorney General, Plaintiff, ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS v. ADAM BOWEN

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/01/2023 09:07 AM CDT -1- Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 315 Nebraska Reports STATE V. GALINDO Cite as 315 Neb. 1 State of Nebraska, appelle

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE CLIFTON JAMESON, ) No. ED109161 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs. ) 19SL-CC02508

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and GANNON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Anderson A. IXCOLGONZALEZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and GANNON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Anderson A. IXCOLGONZALEZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE VEREIT REAL ESTATE, LP, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 22-0402 FILED 4-11-2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2020-016464 The Ho