Cases

OSCN Found Document:Proe et al. v. Diamond Homes et al. Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case P

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The court states that “[t]he issue [in this appeal] is whether creating and submitting the sixty-three page errata document and then continuing to press forward with Norelus’s claims, which had been left completely unsupported once the errata document rendered her testimony useless, constituted conduct sanctionable under [28 U.S.C.] § 1927.” Ante at 485. The Am-l

Opinion issued February 20, 2014. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00198-CR ——————————— SAMUEL DENNY ROBINSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 28, 2010 No. 07-14077 JOHN LEY

148 S.E.2d 611 (1966) 267 N.C. 645 Gladys Trogden DOVE v. Levi Clarence CAIN, Jr., and Shelby Jean Kinlaw. No. 698. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 16, 1966. *613 Grady & Clark, Elizabethtown, for plaintiff, appellant. Hester & Hester, Elizabethtown, for defendants, appellees. E

148 S.E.2d 259 (1966) 267 N.C. 417 STATE v. Lucious Stargal UPCHURCH. No. 743. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 25, 1966. *260 Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton, Asst. Atty. Gen. Charles D. Barham, Jr., and Staff Atty. Wilson B. Partin, Jr., Raleigh, for the State. Blackwell M. Brogden, Durham, for defend

147 S.E.2d 885 (1966) 267 N.C. 182 Calvin C. CLINE v. Sidney Eugene ATWOOD and Buford B. Scott. No. 456. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 4, 1966. *887 Elledge & Mast, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff, appellee. Deal, Hutchins & Minor, Winston-Salem, for defendant Scott, appellant. EM

148 S.E.2d 233 (1966) 267 N.C. 387 Ray E. ANGELL, Robert B. Corns, David M. Crenshaw, and James L. Stough, on behalf of themselves and all other citizens and taxpayers of the City of Raleigh, v. The CITY OF RALEIGH, a municipal corporation, James W. Reid, Charles W. Gaddy, Earl H. Hostetler, William L. McLaurin, Travis H. Tomlinson, John W. Winters, and William H. Worth, members of the City Council of the City of Raleigh,

148 S.E.2d 119 (1966) 267 N.C. 276 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEVADA, Executor under the Will of Pearl K. Wells, Planters National Bank & Trust Company and Lillian Kent Dickens, Ancillary Administrators of the Estate of Pearl K. Wells, v. Redmond S. WELLS. No. 539. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 11, 1966. *

148 S.E.2d 647 (1966) 267 N.C. 631 STATE v. Woodrow W. KING. No. 827. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 16, 1966. *649 Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton and Asst. Atty. Gen. James F. Bullock, for the State. Elreta Melton Alexander, Greensboro, for defendant. EMERY B. DENNY, Emergency Justice. <

148 S.E.2d 282 (1966) 267 N.C. 369 STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. Katherine McDowell PHILLIPS and husband, Parker Phillips and John M. McDowell. No. 621. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 25, 1966. *284 Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton, Deputy Atty. Gen. Harrison Lewis, Trial Atty. Claude W. Harris, and Staff Atty.

149 S.E.2d 19 (1966) 267 N.C. 735 Robert Edward SAUNDERS v. Rufus George WARREN and Radig Vault Company, Inc., a corporation. No. 454. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 6, 1966. *20 White, Crumpler, Powell, Pfefferkorn & Green, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff, appellant. Hudson, Ferrell, Petree

148 S.E.2d 631 (1966) 267 N.C. 626 Jackie Ray WALKER, Administrator of the Estate of Jackie Ray Walker, Jr., v. Annie Young SPRINKLE and Reginald F. Sprinkle. No. 463. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 16, 1966. *633 Banzet & Banzet, Warrenton, for plaintiff. Teague, Johnson & Patterson

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge. In this suit, the owners of certificates of deposit (CD’s) issued by a savings and loan association that shortly after issuance became insolvent, seek to recover from a bank that acquired the association’s deposits and assumed its liabilities the amount of the interest rate on the CD’s, that was higher than the interest rate the acquiring bank offered to the CD holders.. In the purchase and acquisition

470 F.Supp. 790 (1979) AUTO-OWNERS (MUTUAL) INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MIDWEST EMERY FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Nass Truck Lines, Inc., Walter Eugene Nass, d/b/a Nass Trucking, Terrence Turner, Brian Bauer, James Skolek and Donna Skolek, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Todd Skolek, Deceased, Katherine McKay, Tom Armstrong, John Sutton, Tresa Tipler, Bill Koos, Mary Lou McKay, Dennis Lay, Murray Hynes, Brad Shawgo, Tresa Cwick, Joe Fever and T

976 S.W.2d 439 (1998) Dennis Wayne EMERY, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellant/Cross-Respondent. No. 80691. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. September 22, 1998. Rehearing Denied October 20, 1998. *441 Jeffrey S. Thomsen, St. Louis, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent. Thomas A. Con

RUVOLO, P. J. *1120I. INTRODUCTION The City and County of San Francisco, along with the city tax collector and treasurer (collectively, the City), obtained an order from the superior *1121court granting their petition

DONALDSON, Judge. D.B. (“the mother”) appeals from a default judgment entered by the Morgan Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) in favor of D.G. (“the father”), awarding custody of S.G. (“the child”), the parties’ minor child, to the father and ordering the mother to pay child support. We affirm the juvenile court’s determination that it attained jurisdiction over the mother; however, because we find that the mother was

938 F.Supp. 495 (1996) Verna EMERY, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. and American General Finance Corp., Defendants. No. 94 C 5181. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 28, 1996. Daniel A. Edelman, Cathleen Combs Cohen, Tara Leigh Goodwin, Michelle Ann Weinberg, Edel

OPINION Appellant was convicted of capital murder, V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 19.03(a)(2), and sentenced to death, Article 37.071, V.A.C.C.P. In his first point of error, appellant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the record on appeal does not and cannot contain a complete transcription of the proceedings in this case. Because appellant's request for a statement of facts was timely, a