Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Emily Marie Nicholson”
Wallis v. Cambronpublic domain
670 S.E.2d 239 (2008) Liam Patrick WALLIS, individually, Plantation Property Management, LLC and Liam Patrick Wallis, as representative shareholder on behalf of Chartwell Homes, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Andrew CAMBRON, Richard M. Greene, Bay Point, LLC, and Big Bald Mountain, LLC, Defendants. No. COA08-178. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 2, 2008.
Matter of Zaire S. (Mary W.)public domain
Matter of Zaire S. (Mary W.) (2020 NY Slip Op 01027) Matter of Zaire S. (Mary W.) 2020 NY Slip Op 01027 Decided on February 13, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Federal Trade Commission v. AmeriDebt, Inc.public domain
373 F.Supp.2d 558 (2005) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. AMERIDEBT, INC. et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. PJM 03-3317. United States District Court, D. Maryland. May 9, 2005. *559 *560 Jeanne M. Crouse, Jeanne-Marie Sidonie Raymond Burke, Ramona Dee Elliott, Allison Ilene Brown, James An
Matter of Dylan C. (Carmen v.public domain
Appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Emily M. Olshansky, J.), dated March 12, 2013, and (2) an order of disposition of that court dated April 26, 2013. The order of fact-finding, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, found that the mother neglected the subject child Melissa V. The order of disposition released the subject children Dylan C., Alberto C., Aaliyah C., and Car
City of Perry v. Procter & Gamble Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, the city of Perry, Iowa (“Perry” or the “City”), brings this putative class action against six leading manufacturers of so-called “flushable wipes”: Procter <& Gamble Company (“P&G”), Kimberly-Clark Corporation (“Kimberly-Clark”), Nice-Pak Products, Inc. (“Nice-Pak”), Professional Disposables International, Inc. (“PDI”)
Niang v. Carrollpublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Missouri statutes require African-style hair braiders to be licensed as barbers or cosmetologists. Ndioba “Joba” Niang and Tameka Stigers challenge this requirement under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court1 granted summary judgment for the State. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
Willie C. Wages v. Robert A. McDonaldpublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 13-2694 WILLIE C. WAGES, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued December 12, 2014
Nia Barnett v. Robert L. Wilkiepublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 17-3585 NIA BARNETT, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
In re Karissa NN.public domain
Cardona, P.J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), entered February 13, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to adjudicate respondent’s child to be neglected. Based primarily upon allegations that respondent arrived in an intoxicated state at a supervised visitation with her daughter, Karissa NN. (born in 2000),
Sean A. Ravin v. Robert L. Wilkiepublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 17-0285 SEAN A. RAVIN, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided November 2, 2018)
Wallis v. Cambronpublic domain
LIAM PATRICK WALLIS, individually, PLANTATION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC and LIAM PATRICK WALLIS, as representative shareholder on behalf of CHARTWELL HOMES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. ANDREW CAMBRON, RICHARD M. GREENE, and BIG BALD MOUNTAIN, LLC, Defendants. No. COA08-481 Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed December 2, 2008 This case not for publication Forman Rossabi Bl
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANTONIO RUIZ and MARIA HERNANDEZ, Appellants, v. WENDY'S TRUCKING, LLC, a Florida Corporation; WENDY MARIE CABRERA, an individual; REINIER ALONSO LEYVA, an individual; ROBERTO GARCIA, an individual; J&J HAULING, INC., a Florida Corporation; and JESUS GARCIA, an individual, Appellees.
Angela Ames v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Copublic domain
ORDER Angela Ames petitions for rehearing of this court’s decision filed March 13, 2014. Represented by new counsel who appears for the first time on the petition, Ames leads with an entirely new argument. She contends the Supreme Court’s decision in Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129, 124 S.Ct. 2342, 159 L.Ed.2d 204 (2004), supersedes circuit precedent
Stenson Fears, Jr. v. Robert L. Wilkiepublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 17-2345 STENSON FEARS, JR., APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued July 1
Marchionda v. Embassy Suites Franchise, LLCpublic domain
JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge This matter comes before the Court on motion for summary judgment brought by Defendants Embassy Suites Franchise, LLC; Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.; Hilton Worldwide, Inc.; and Atrium TRS III, LP as to Count One. Those Defendants, along with Defendant John Q. Hammons Hotels Management, LLC, also move for summary judgment as to Count Two. Plaintiff Cheri Marchionda resists. The Court held a hearing
Shenk v. Karmazinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. In this derivative action on behalf of Sirius XM Radio, Inc. (“Sirius XM”), plaintiff Robert Michael Shenk alleges that the defendants, all of whom are either officers or directors at Sirius XM, committed certain transgressions while persuading regulators and shareholders to approve a merger between Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. (“Sirius”) and XM Sate
Ballard v. Burnhampublic domain
Andrews, Presiding Judge. Mary Ballard appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to James Burnham, her son-in-law, in her premises liability action. In reviewing the grant or denial of summary judgment, we apply a de novo standard of review and consider the evidence with all reasonable inferences therefrom in favor of the party opposing summary judgment. Goring v. Martinez, 224 Ga. Ap
Donald v. McCray v. Robert L. Wilkiepublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 17-1875 DONALD V. MCCRAY, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued November 1, 2018
Van Buren v. Ohio Department of Public Safetypublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff David Van Burén brings this reverse racial discrimination and retaliation case against his employer the Ohio Department of Public Safety and two of its directors. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Discovery Order (ECF No. 56) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 57).
United States v. Strakerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Petitioners Anderson Straker, Wayne Pierre, Ricardo De Four, Zion Clarke, Kevin Nixon, and Kevon Demerieux were tried and found guilty of two offenses: conspiracy to commit hostage taking, and hostage taking, resulting in death. They were sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment on each count, followed by five years’ supervised release