Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Emma Lee Scott”
Succession of Scottpublic domain
CHEHARDY, Judge. Hilliard C. Fazande II appeals a judgment in favor of his half-brother, Lorenzo A. Scott II, annulling a 1978 judgment under which Fazande had been declared owner of certain real estate formerly a part of their mother’s succession. On appeal Fa-zande asserts the trial judge erred in failing to find that the annulment action had prescribed; alternatively, that the trial court erred in finding Scott was a “d
In Re Scottpublic domain
24 B.R. 738 (1982) In re Willie Lee SCOTT and Emma M. Scott, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 82-01430. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama. November 12, 1982. Karen Knight, Watkins, Carter & Knight, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff. Charles N. Parnell, Wood, Minor & Parnell, Montgomery, Ala., for defendants. ORDER LEON J. HOPPER, Bankr
Scott v. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INS.public domain
This case involves an allegation of civil conspiracy. The facts involve several parties. *Page 103 The plaintiff/appellants, Willie L. and Emma M. Scott, owned a house in Montgomery. In 1983, the mortgage on the house was foreclosed. After the foreclosure had been advertised, the Scotts were approached by George T. Van Buren, one of the defendants in this action, and they reached some sort of agreement concerning the disposition of their house.
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04- 05-00905-CV Emma CASSO; Elvia Laurel; and Ramiro R. Casso, M.D.; Appellants v. David Lee FULLERTON, Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No
Noelle Lee v. Robert Fisherpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOELLE LEE, derivatively on behalf No. 21-15923 of The Gap, Inc, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-06163-SK v. ROBERT J. FISHER; SONIA OPINION SYNGAL; ARTHUR PECK; AMY BOHUTINSKY; AMY MILES; ISABELLA D. GOREN; BOB L. MARTIN; CHRIS O'NEILL; ELIZABETH A. SMITH; JOHN J. FISHER; JORGE P. MONTOYA; MAY
Smith v. Duckworthpublic domain
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Michael DeWayne Smith was charged with two counts of murder for the killings of Sarath Pulluru and Janet Moore. He was convicted and sentenced to death. The *1238 Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed his convictions on direct
Barry v. Drennenpublic domain
The plaintiff, The D.M. Drennen and Emma Houston Drennen Memorial Trust of Saint Mary's Church ("the Drennen Trust"), a trust duly established under Alabama law, brought this action against Michael Barry seeking a judgment declaring that the Drennen Trust, which owns property ("the Drennen property") adjacent to property owned by Barry, (1) holds unrestricted title to that portion of the Drennen property on which an encroachment is allegedly located; (2) that the encroachment in dispu
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 23–1145 Submitted April 11, 2024—Filed June 28, 2024 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., EMMA GOLDMAN CLINIC, and SARAH TRAXLER, Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA, and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Joseph Seidlin, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law
Custer v. McDonaldpublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 23–1145 Submitted April 11, 2024—Filed June 28, 2024 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., EMMA GOLDMAN CLINIC, and SARAH TRAXLER, Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA, and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Joseph Seidlin, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law
423 A.2d 210 (1980) Emma LEE, Robert Harlan, and Vanessa Hayes, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF APPEALS AND REVIEW, Respondent, BGM Associates, Intervenor. No. 79-199. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 19, 1980. Decided November 6, 1980. *212 Paul D. Scott, Neighborhood Lega
KING, Circuit Judge: What follows is the tale of competing mineral leases on the Louisiana property of Lee and Patsy Stockman during the Haynesville Shale leasing frenzy. In April 2008, the Stockmans entered into an extension of their mineral lease with Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. and received a $240,000 bonus. In May 2008, the Stock-mans entered into a mineral lease with Petroha
Paredes v. McDonaldpublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
03/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD LYONS, JAMES MICHAEL USINGER, LEE HAROLD CROMWELL, AUSTIN GARY COOPER, AND CHRISTOPHER ALAN HAUSER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 2017-A-79; 2
Heaper v. Brown (In Re Heaper)public domain
214 B.R. 576 (1997) In re Melvin Albert HEAPER, Ruby Emma Lee Heaper, Debtors. Melvin Albert HEAPER, Ruby Emma Lee Heaper, and Mary Egan, Appellants, v. Jack E. BROWN, Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. 97-6027WM. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted September 30, 1997. Decided November 28, 1997.
In re Jamie J.public domain
WILSON, J. *469***279This case presents the novel question of whether Family Court retains subject matter jurisdiction to conduct a permanency hearing pursuant to Family Court Act article 10-A once the underlying neglect petition brought under article 10
189 F.Supp.2d 482 (2002) Andrew BOURNE, a minor by and through his Parents, next friends and natural guardians, Chris BOURNE and Maggie Bourne, Plaintiff v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant No. CIV A 2:97-0090. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston. March 29, 2002. *483 James L. Ferrar
Grace v. Whitakerpublic domain
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge When Congress passed the Refugee Act in 1980, it made its intentions clear: the purpose was to enforce the "historic policy of the United States to respond to the urgent needs of persons subject to persecution in their homelands." Refugee Act of 1980, § 101(a), Pub. L. No. 96-212, 94 Stat. 102
United States v. Rivera-Hernandezpublic domain
OPINION and ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, United States' District Judge In this Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (2004) antitrust case, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the Sherman Act does not apply to Puerto Rico because it is not a State. (Docket No. 41.) In response, the Government argues that Puerto Rico is indeed a State for the purposes of the Sherman Act since Cór
United States v. Emma Lou Klande and Barbara Ann Klande, United States of America v. Darrell Lee Schaapveldpublic domain
ROSS, Circuit Judge. Defendants appeal an order of the district court 1 denying their motions to dismiss the indictment on grounds of double jeopardy. We affirm. Defendants, Darrell Lee Schaapveld, Barbara Ann Klande and Emma Lou Klande were indicted on charges of conspiring to import and distri