⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Emma Lee Scott”

Succession of Scottpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985-12-16 · Published · cited 1× · 480 So. 2d 1022; 1985 La. App. LEXIS 10573
CHEHARDY, Judge. Hilliard C. Fazande II appeals a judgment in favor of his half-brother, Lorenzo A. Scott II, annulling a 1978 judgment under which Fazande had been declared owner of certain real estate formerly a part of their mother’s succession. On appeal Fa-zande asserts the trial judge erred in failing to find that the annulment action had prescribed; alternatively, that the trial court erred in finding Scott was a “d
In Re Scottpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1982-11-12 · Published · cited 13× · 24 B.R. 738; 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 2933
24 B.R. 738 (1982) In re Willie Lee SCOTT and Emma M. Scott, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 82-01430. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama. November 12, 1982. Karen Knight, Watkins, Carter & Knight, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff. Charles N. Parnell, Wood, Minor & Parnell, Montgomery, Ala., for defendants. ORDER LEON J. HOPPER, Bankr
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987-11-20 · Published · cited 7× · 518 So. 2d 102; 1987 WL 31264
This case involves an allegation of civil conspiracy. The facts involve several parties. *Page 103 The plaintiff/appellants, Willie L. and Emma M. Scott, owned a house in Montgomery. In 1983, the mortgage on the house was foreclosed. After the foreclosure had been advertised, the Scotts were approached by George T. Van Buren, one of the defendants in this action, and they reached some sort of agreement concerning the disposition of their house.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2006-09-13 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04- 05-00905-CV Emma CASSO; Elvia Laurel; and Ramiro R. Casso, M.D.; Appellants v. David Lee FULLERTON, Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-06-01 · Published · cited 26× · 70 F.4th 1129
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOELLE LEE, derivatively on behalf No. 21-15923 of The Gap, Inc, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-06163-SK v. ROBERT J. FISHER; SONIA OPINION SYNGAL; ARTHUR PECK; AMY BOHUTINSKY; AMY MILES; ISABELLA D. GOREN; BOB L. MARTIN; CHRIS O'NEILL; ELIZABETH A. SMITH; JOHN J. FISHER; JORGE P. MONTOYA; MAY
Smith v. Duckworthpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-06-06 · Published · cited 112× · 824 F.3d 1233; 2016 WL 3163056
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Michael DeWayne Smith was charged with two counts of murder for the killings of Sarath Pulluru and Janet Moore. He was convicted and sentenced to death. The *1238 Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed his convictions on direct
Barry v. Drennenpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 896 So. 2d 430; 2004 Ala. LEXIS 199; 2004 WL 1802984
The plaintiff, The D.M. Drennen and Emma Houston Drennen Memorial Trust of Saint Mary's Church ("the Drennen Trust"), a trust duly established under Alabama law, brought this action against Michael Barry seeking a judgment declaring that the Drennen Trust, which owns property ("the Drennen property") adjacent to property owned by Barry, (1) holds unrestricted title to that portion of the Drennen property on which an encroachment is allegedly located; (2) that the encroachment in dispu
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 23–1145 Submitted April 11, 2024—Filed June 28, 2024 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., EMMA GOLDMAN CLINIC, and SARAH TRAXLER, Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA, and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Joseph Seidlin, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law
Custer v. McDonaldpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-03-16 · Published · cited 0× · 642 F. App'x 995
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 23–1145 Submitted April 11, 2024—Filed June 28, 2024 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., EMMA GOLDMAN CLINIC, and SARAH TRAXLER, Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA, and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Joseph Seidlin, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980-11-06 · Published · cited 25× · 423 A.2d 210; 1980 D.C. App. LEXIS 405
423 A.2d 210 (1980) Emma LEE, Robert Harlan, and Vanessa Hayes, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF APPEALS AND REVIEW, Respondent, BGM Associates, Intervenor. No. 79-199. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 19, 1980. Decided November 6, 1980. *212 Paul D. Scott, Neighborhood Lega
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-07-24 · Published · cited 46× · 689 F.3d 380; 2012 WL 3011035; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15286
KING, Circuit Judge: What follows is the tale of competing mineral leases on the Louisiana property of Lee and Patsy Stockman during the Haynesville Shale leasing frenzy. In April 2008, the Stockmans entered into an extension of their mineral lease with Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. and received a $240,000 bonus. In May 2008, the Stock-mans entered into a mineral lease with Petroha
Paredes v. McDonaldpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-01-08 · Published · cited 0× · 627 F. App'x 930
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-03-22 · Published · cited 0×
03/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD LYONS, JAMES MICHAEL USINGER, LEE HAROLD CROMWELL, AUSTIN GARY COOPER, AND CHRISTOPHER ALAN HAUSER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 2017-A-79; 2
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997-11-28 · Published · cited 5× · 214 B.R. 576; 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1875; 31 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1015; 1997 WL 733962
214 B.R. 576 (1997) In re Melvin Albert HEAPER, Ruby Emma Lee Heaper, Debtors. Melvin Albert HEAPER, Ruby Emma Lee Heaper, and Mary Egan, Appellants, v. Jack E. BROWN, Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. 97-6027WM. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted September 30, 1997. Decided November 28, 1997.
In re Jamie J.public domain
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017-11-20 · Published · cited 30× · 89 N.E.3d 468; 67 N.Y.S.3d 78; 30 N.Y.3d 275
WILSON, J. *469***279This case presents the novel question of whether Family Court retains subject matter jurisdiction to conduct a permanency hearing pursuant to Family Court Act article 10-A once the underlying neglect petition brought under article 10
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002-03-29 · Published · cited 12× · 189 F. Supp. 2d 482; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5521; 2002 WL 272392
189 F.Supp.2d 482 (2002) Andrew BOURNE, a minor by and through his Parents, next friends and natural guardians, Chris BOURNE and Maggie Bourne, Plaintiff v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant No. CIV A 2:97-0090. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston. March 29, 2002. *483 James L. Ferrar
Grace v. Whitakerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-12-17 · Published · cited 39× · 344 F. Supp. 3d 96
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge When Congress passed the Refugee Act in 1980, it made its intentions clear: the purpose was to enforce the "historic policy of the United States to respond to the urgent needs of persons subject to persecution in their homelands." Refugee Act of 1980, § 101(a), Pub. L. No. 96-212, 94 Stat. 102
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 155 F. Supp. 3d 137
OPINION and ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, United States' District Judge In this Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (2004) antitrust case, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the Sherman Act does not apply to Puerto Rico because it is not a State. (Docket No. 41.) In response, the Government argues that Puerto Rico is indeed a State for the purposes of the Sherman Act since Cór
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 602 F.2d 180; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 12918
ROSS, Circuit Judge. Defendants appeal an order of the district court 1 denying their motions to dismiss the indictment on grounds of double jeopardy. We affirm. Defendants, Darrell Lee Schaapveld, Barbara Ann Klande and Emma Lou Klande were indicted on charges of conspiring to import and distri