Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Encore Bank v. Davis”
Reverse and Remand and Opinion Filed April 7, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00070-CV ENCORE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT FUNDS, LLC, Appellant V. 2608 INWOOD, LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00700-CV Joyce Ludwig, Appellant
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00700-CV Joyce Ludwig, Appellant v. Encore Medical, L.P. f/k/a Encore Orthopedics, Inc.; Encore Medical GP, Inc.; and Encore Medical Corporation, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN201588, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGT
In re Encore Prop. Mgmt. of W. N.Y., LLCpublic domain
I. JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a), 157(b)(1), and 1334(b). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b
Ludwig v. Encore Medical, L.P.public domain
191 S.W.3d 285 (2006) Joyce LUDWIG, Appellant, v. ENCORE MEDICAL, L.P. f/k/a Encore Orthopedics, Inc.; Encore Medical GP, Inc.; and Encore Medical Corporation, Appellee. No. 03-04-00700-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. March 9, 2006. Rehearing Overruled April 19, 2006. *286 Kevin C. Norton, Cantey & Han
Bannum, Inc. and Christopher Tovar D/B/A Tovar Construction Company v. Eugene Mees D/B/A Encore Housepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-12-00458-CV ________________________ BANNUM, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER TOVAR D/B/A TOVAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLANTS V. EUGENE MEES D/
American Legalnet, Inc. v. Davispublic domain
673 F.Supp.2d 1063 (2009) AMERICAN LEGALNET, INC., a California corporation v. Geoffrey Scott DAVIS, et al. Case No. CV 09-7957-ODW(RCx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 25, 2009. *1064 Lonnie Domonic Giamela, Andrew R. Hein, for Plaintiff. Benjamin A. Nix, for Defendant. PROCEEDINGS
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Gerberpublic domain
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") filed a complaint in mortgage foreclosure against defendants Brian A. Gerber and Tracy L. Gerber ("the Gerbers"). In addition to answering the complaint and raising affirmative defenses, the Gerbers assert two counterclaims. U.S. Bank moves to dismiss both counterclaims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and also moves to strike man
Miller v. Bank of America, National Ass'npublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge. On November 14, 2011, Defendant Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., (“BAC” or “Defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Ronnie Miller’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [Doc. No. 12-1.]1
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00446-CV Kenton E. MCDONALD, Appellant v. Santos VARGAS and Davis & Santos, PLLC, Appelle
302 S.W.3d 515 (2009) J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., successor by merger to Bank One, N.A.; and Michael Bobinchuck, Appellants, v. TEXAS CONTRACT CARPET, INC.; Gypsum Floors of Texas, Inc.; and Agape Round Rock Housing, Inc., d/b/a Chandler Creek Apartments, Appellees. No. 03-05-00629-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. December 11, 2009.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1356-12T3 SALVATORE LOPRESTI and MARGARET LOPRESTI, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiffs-Appellants, April 8, 2014 APPELLATE DIVISION v
Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. City of Clevelandpublic domain
735 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) CHASE BANK USA, N.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, Defendant. Case No. 1:08CV514. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 5, 2010. *775 Isaac Schulz, Michael N. Ungar, Richik Sarkar, Elizabeth A. Jerdonek, Isaac J. Eddington, Ulmer & Berne, Cleveland, OH, for Pla
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Clarkpublic domain
807 N.E.2d 1109 (2004) 348 Ill. App.3d 856 283 Ill.Dec. 268 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CLARK and Betty Clark, Defendants-Appellants. Eastern Savings Bank, FSB, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Iris Peters, Defendant-Appellant. Equicredit Corporation of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Goldie Johnson, Defendant-Appellant. Aames Funding Corporation,
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Clarkpublic domain
FIFTH DIVISION MARCH 31, 2004 Nos. 1-01-2535, 1-01-2536, 1-01-2538, 1-01-2541, 1-01-2545, 1-01-2546, 1-01-2813, 1-01-2814 and 1-01-2815 (Consolidated) I
Succession of Sinnot v. Hibernia National Bankpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Nici-iolls, C. J. Statement op the Case. Nicholes, C. J. Mrs. Nita Bohn, wife of O. Otto Weber, in her petition in this case, avers that the late Miss Emily O. Sinnot, at the date of her death, owned twelve shares of the capital stock of the Hibernia National Bank of New Orleans, said stock being covered by certificates Nos. 50 and 128 for nine shares
State ex rel. Schwarzmer v. Mazzonepublic domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Schwarzmer v. Mazzone, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1246.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of
Barttile Recovery Solutions L.L.C. v. Cleavengerpublic domain
[Cite as Barttile Recovery Solutions L.L.C. v. Cleavenger, 2025-Ohio-4589.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA BARTTILE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS : LLC, : Plaintiff, : No. 1
Brown v. Cincinnatipublic domain
[Cite as Brown v. Cincinnati, 2020-Ohio-5418.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO TERRY BROWN, : APPEAL NO. C-200031 TRIAL NO. A-1900301 Plaintiff-Appellee, : : O P I N I O N. vs.
Johnson v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLCpublic domain
PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE In this certified class action, the plaintiff class alleges that a dunning letter sent by defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC was false, misleading or confusing in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, putting before me the question whether the claim can be decided as a matter of law based on undisputed facts, without a trial. Neith