Cases

Opinion filed September 12, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00350-CV __________ ETC TEXAS PIPELINE, LTD., Appellant V. XTO ENERGY INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 385th District Court Mi

HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Skedco, Inc. brings this action against Defendant Strategic Operations, Inc., alleging that Defendant infringes Claims 18, 19, and 20 of United States Patent No. 8,342,652 ("the '852 Patent") which discloses a system for simulating hemorrhages in the training of first responders.1 The United States, through the Secretary of the Army, owns the '852 Patent. Plaintiff is

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta

MARIANNE O. BATTANI, United States District Judge *808I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs GEICO Corporation and a number of affiliated entities (collectively "GEICO") brought this suit on September 2, 2016, asserting federal antitrust and state law claims against fourteen auto parts manufacturers and suppliers arising from alleged consp

SEAN H. LANE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is Republic Airways Holdings Inc., et. al. 's ("Republic" or the "Debtors") Motion for Summary Judgment with Respect to its Objection to Claims Filed by Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A., as Owner Trustee, and ALF VI, Inc., as Owner Participant (the "SJM") [ECF No. 2029]. The SJM addresses two major issues in the aircraft leases between these parties: (i)

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA” or “Board”) in SUFI Network Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 55306, 09-1 BCA ¶ 34,018 (Nov. 21, 2008) (“SUFI VIII”).1 Our Court normally operates as a trial tribunal, but in this ease, involving a non-appropriated fund inst

394 F.Supp.2d 923 (2005) KOTHMANN ENTERPRISES, INC., successor by merger to Kothmann and Kothmann, Inc. Plaintiff, v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. H-01-2668. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 30, 2005. *924 *925

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung” or “Defendants”). ECF No. 134. The motion has been fully briefed and is therefore ripe for decision. After exa

ACCEPTED 05-15-00161-CV 05-15-00161-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/9/2015 3:21:23 PM NO.

678 F.Supp.2d 827 (2009) Timothy ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN PALLET LEASING INC., et al., Defendants. No. C07-4107-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. August 26, 2009. *832 Jeff W. Wright, Jill A. Finken, Heidman Redmond Fredregill Patterson Plaza Dykstra & Prahl, Sioux City, IA, Mar

922 F.Supp. 1334 (1996) TERRA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a Mississippi corporation, Defendant. No. C 95-4088. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. April 5, 1996. *1335 *1336 *1

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

467 F.Supp. 1257 (1978) TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. TURBINE SERVICE, INC., Gonzales Manufacturing and Industrial Machine Works, Inc., and a Certain Turbine Rotor, Casing, Blades, Rings, Housing, and All Assorted Parts Thereto, all of which being from the SS KATRIN, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 75-1825, 75-2719. United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana. September

OPINION & ORDER SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. These cases arise from a disaster that occurred on November 11, 2000, in which a ski train in Kaprun, Austria caught fire, killing 155 people. American and foreign survivors and/or relatives of those who died in the fire brought a number of lawsuits in federal court against numerous defendants alleging, inter alia, negligence and strict l

Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Plaintiff Sebastian Phillips ("Mr. Phillips"), a Naval Architect, and his architecture and engineering firm, Plaintiff Marine Design Dynamics, Inc. ("MDD"), allege that they have been effectively debarred from future government contracts with the United States Department of the Navy since 2011. Plaintiffs sued the Secretary of the Navy, the Chief and Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”) ease is before the court after trial and post-trial briefing. Plaintiffs, three utility companies, are joint owners of the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, which operates the Wolf Creek Generating Station (“Wolf Creek”), a single-unit nuclear reactor located in Coffey County, Kansas Transcript of

(2007) In re W. Ryan HOVIS, Trustee for Marine Energy Systems Corporation, Debtor. W. Ryan Hovis, Trustee for Marine Energy Systems Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. General Dynamics Corporation, Electric Boat Corporation, Seimens Westinghouse Power Corp., and Viacom, Inc., Appellees-Defendants. C.A. No. 2:06-2483-PMD. Bankruptcy No. 97-01929-JW. Adversary No. 98-80220-JW. United States District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SEBASTIAN PHILLIPS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 11-cv-02021 (EGS) RICHARD V. SPENCER, 1 Secretary of the Navy, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Sebastian Phillips (“Mr. Phillips”), a Naval Architect, and his architecture and engineering firm

375 F.Supp.2d 411 (2005) ACTION MANUFACTURING CO., INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SIMON WRECKING CO., et al., Defendants No. Civ.A.02-CV-8964. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 20, 2005. *412 *413 *414 David E. Romine, Larry D. Silver, Lan