⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Epperson v. Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services, Inc.”

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2018-02-27 · Published · cited 2× · 583 B.R. 1
B. Contested Matters Also before the Court at Trial were the following contested matters (collectively, the "Contested Matters") filed in the Bankruptcy Case, related to Proofs of Claim 4-1 through 9-1 and CHFS's use of alleged cash collateral: Proofs of Claim 4-1 & 5-1 Objection to Claim of Beher Holdings Trust (Claim No. 4) and to Claim of Edwards F
Michigan Supreme Court · 1990-04-09 · Published · cited 46× · 455 N.W.2d 1; 434 Mich. 380
434 Mich. 380 (1990) 455 N.W.2d 1 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. EMMANUEL BAPTIST PRESCHOOL Docket No. 79024, (Calendar No. 4). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued January 6, 1988. Decided April 9, 1990. *385 Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor Gener
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985-06-26 · Published · cited 25× · 766 F.2d 932; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20090; 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,336; 38 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 155
CONTIE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Dayton Christian Schools, Inc., et al. appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking declaratory and in-junctive relief from application of the Ohio Civil Rights Act, Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 4112.01 et seq. (Page 1959).
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983-02-04 · Published · cited 48× · 698 F.2d 1098
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC. (Opinion June 21, 1982, 11 Cir., 1982, 678 F.2d 1379) Before KRAVITCH and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: The Order of this Court dated January 7, 1983, denying the Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc having been entered inadvertently without
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 678 F.2d 1379
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: This case presents important questions concerning the scope of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and the plaintiffs-appellees’ ability to demonstrate Article III standing thereunder. The operative facts of this case are relatively simple. In 1979 the Rabun County Chamber of Commerce (Chamber), with initial approval from the State of Georgia, erected an illuminated latín cross on an 85 f
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-05-07 · Published · cited 12× · 136 F.4th 648
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0118p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BENNY LEE HODGE, │ P
Bates v. Paksereshtpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JESSICA BATES, No. 23-4169 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00474- AN v. Director FARIBORZ OPINION PAKSERESHT, in his official capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Human S
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-10-20 · Published · cited 26× · 532 S.W.3d 243
OPINION Holly Kirby, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. In this interlocutory appeal, the trustee of a trust executed an investment/bro
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-06-14 · Published · cited 11× · 104 F.4th 577
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0132p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ STATE OF TENNESSEE; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA;
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-05-25 · Published · cited 85× · 857 F.3d 554; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9109; 2017 WL 2273306
WYNN, Circuit Judge, concurring: Invidious discrimination that is shrouded in layers of legality is no less an insult to our Constitution than naked invidious discrimination. We have matured from the lessons learned by past experiences documented, for example, in Dred Scott and Korematsu. But we again encounter the affront of invidious discrimination—this time layered under the guise of a
Mahmoud v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 606 U.S. 522
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 522–655 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2008-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-01-10 · Published · cited 7× · 2020 Ohio 48
[Cite as Weaner & Assocs., L.L.C. v. 369 W. First, L.L.C., 2020-Ohio-48.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY WILLIAM E. WEANER & : ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al. : : Appellate Case No. 28399 Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-10-20 · Published · cited 0×
10/20/2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 10, 2017 Session WADE HARVEY, EX REL. ALEXIS BREANNA GLADDEN v. CUMBERLAND TRUST AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Hamblen County
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-10-20 · Published · cited 0×
10/20/2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 10, 2017 Session WADE HARVEY, EX REL. ALEXIS BREANNA GLADDEN v. CUMBERLAND TRUST AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Hamblen County
State v. Douglas D.public domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001-05-16 · Published · cited 45× · 2001 WI 47; 626 N.W.2d 725; 243 Wis. 2d 204; 2001 Wisc. LEXIS 380
243 Wis.2d 204 (2001) 2001 WI 47 626 N.W.2d 725 IN the INTEREST OF DOUGLAS D., a person Under the Age of 17: STATE of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. DOUGLAS D., Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.[†] No. 99-1767-FT. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument October 3, 2000. Decided May 16, 2001.<
Statler v. Dodsonpublic domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995-12-13 · Published · cited 10× · 466 S.E.2d 497; 195 W. Va. 646; 1995 W. Va. LEXIS 252
466 S.E.2d 497 (1995) 195 W.Va. 646 Linda M. STATLER, Guardian of Destiny Lynn Ware, Petitioner Below, Appellee, v. Vel Anne DODSON, Executrix of Estate of Richard A. Ware, Respondent Below, Appellee. Michael L. Scales, Appellant. No. 22544. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 13, 1995. Decided December 13,
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2006-11-09 · Published · cited 1× · 465 F. Supp. 2d 1164; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84437; 2006 WL 3246483
465 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2006) Paul F. WEINBAUM, Olivia S. Weinbaum, Martin J. Boyd, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO, William Mattiace, individually, and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Las Cruces, Dolores Archuleta, individually, and in her capacity as a member of the City Council of the City of Las Cruces, New Mexico, Dolores Connor, individually, and in her capacity as a member of the City Council of the City of Las C
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-09-12 · Published · cited 36× · 541 F.3d 1017; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19545; 2008 WL 4182390
541 F.3d 1017 (2008) Paul F. WEINBAUM; Martin J. Boyd, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO; William Mattiace, individually, and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Las Cruces; Dolores Archuleta, individually, and in her capacity as a member of the City Council of the City of Las Cruces; Dolores Connor, individually, and in her capacity as a member of the City Council of the City of Las Cruces; Jose Frietze, i
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2006-11-09 · Published · cited 2× · 465 F. Supp. 2d 1116; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83311; 2006 WL 3246468
465 F.Supp.2d 1116 (2006) Paul F. WEINBAUM, Plaintiff, v. LAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Charles Davis, Leonel Briseno, Gene Gant, John Schwebke, Sharon Wooden, as School Board Members of Las Cruces Public Schools, Defendants. No. CV 03-1043 RB/LAM. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. November 9, 2006. *1121 Jesse V. Chavez,