Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Hanover Regional Medical Center”
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
National Ass'n v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.public domain
453 F.Supp. 330 (1978) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al., Plaintiffs, v. The WILMINGTON MEDICAL CENTER, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 76-298. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 21, 1978. *331 *332 Douglas Shachtman, Community Legal Aid Socie
Adams v. New York State Education Departmentpublic domain
752 F.Supp.2d 420 (2010) Twana ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 5996(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 18, 2010. *423 Joy Hochstadt, Joy Hochstadt P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. Antoinette W. Blanchette, New York State Office of
Zerbetz v. Alaska Energy Centerpublic domain
708 P.2d 1270 (1985) Gordon J. ZERBETZ, Appellant, v. ALASKA ENERGY CENTER and State of Alaska, Appellees. No. 7873. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 10, 1985. *1272 B. Richard Edwards, Dave R. Christianson, Law Offices of B. Richard Edwards, Anchorage, for appellant. Thomas M. Jahnke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Norman C. Gorsuch, Atty
Williams v. Illinois State Scholarship Commissionpublic domain
563 N.E.2d 465 (1990) 139 Ill.2d 24 150 Ill.Dec. 578 Evelyn L. WILLIAMS, et al., Appellees, v. The ILLINOIS STATE SCHOLARSHIP COMMISSION, et al., Appellants. No. 68869. Supreme Court of Illinois. October 18, 1990. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1990. *467 Neil F. Har
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Wilkerson v. Martin Marietta Corp.public domain
ORDER APPROVING CONSENT DECREE DANIEL, Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court in connection with the Consent Decree entered into between the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“the EEOC”) and Martin Marietta Corporation, now known as Lockheed Martin Company (“MMC”) (collectively “the Parties”). A hearing regarding the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the Consent Decree was held March 5, 1997, wh
Williamson v. Carolina Power and Light Co.public domain
754 F.Supp.2d 787 (2010) Cynthia C. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY d/b/a Progress Energy, Carolina, Inc., Defendants. No. 5:10-cv-258-bo. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. November 29, 2010. *789 Sandra J. Polin, Law Office of Sandra J. Polin, Cary, NC, for Plaintiff.
958 S.W.2d 512 (1997) 330 Ark. 767 CRITTENDEN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CRITTENDEN COUNTY, Appellee. No. 97-43. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 18, 1997. James A. Johnson, Memphis, TN, for Appellant. Diane S. Mackey, Little Rock, Brief for the Arkansas Hospital Association as Amicus Curiae Sup
Prunckun v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Social Services Oldham v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Social Servicespublic domain
VALIHURA, Justice: I. Overview Ashlee Oldham ("Ashlee") and Robert Prunckun ("Robert") (collectively, "Recipients") are the only two Delaware Medicaid recipients housed at Judge Rotenberg Center ("JRC"), a facility in Massachusetts and the only facility in the United States known to use a skin-shocking device, namely a graduated electronic decelerator
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS. Prior Report: 207 F.3d 599. ORDER Part VIII B of the opinion, concerning front pay damages, has been amended. OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Defendant, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Products, Inc. (hereinafter CPI), a subsidiary of Johnson &a;
Corrales v. Bradstreetpublic domain
62 Cal.Rptr.3d 440 (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 33 Fausto CORRALES et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Angela BRADSTREET, As Labor Commissioner, etc. Defendant and Respondent. No. C051407. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. July 10, 2007. *443 California Rural Legal Assistance, Michael M. Meuter, Me
Brown v. Jamespublic domain
389 S.C. 41 (2010) 697 S.E.2d 604 Sharon BROWN, Appellant, v. William B. JAMES, Superintendent for Cherokee County School District, Respondent. No. 4674. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard October 13, 2009. Decided April 12, 2010. Withdrawn, Substituted and Refiled July 21, 2010. Rehearing Denied
Guggenberger ex rel. Guggenberger v. Statepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Department of Human Services (“DHS”), and DHS Commissioner Emily Johnson Piper (“Commissioner Johnson Piper”)1 (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. No.
DiCesare v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 156A17-2 Filed 18 December 2020 CHRISTOPHER DICESARE, JAMES LITTLE, and DIANA STONE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTUHORITY, d/b/a CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-27(a)(3) and by writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32
John E. Andrus Memorial, Inc. v. Dainespublic domain
600 F.Supp.2d 563 (2009) JOHN E. ANDRUS MEMORIAL, INC. (d/b/a Andrus on Hudson), Plaintiff, v. Richard F. DAINES, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Defendant. No. 07-CV-3432 (CS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 4, 2009. *564 Peter G. Bergmann, Esq., Brian T. Mc-Govern, Esq., Ariel V.
State v. Thomas Zingispublic domain
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Thomas Zingis (A-66-21) (087132) Argued March 26, 2024 -- Decided August 8, 2024 -- Revised November 7, 2024 NORIEGA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In State v. Cassidy
State v. Thomas Zingispublic domain
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Thomas Zingis (A-66-21) (087132) Argued March 26, 2024 -- Decided August 8, 2024 NORIEGA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In State v. Cassidy, 235 N.J. 482, 486 (2018),
Vuona v. Merrill Lynch & Co.public domain
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Jennifer Vuona, Sara Hudson, Julia Kuo, and Catherine Wharton (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring suit against defendants Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Bank of America Corporation (collectively, “ML”), alleging that their employment was unlawfully terminated on the basis
West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. v. UPMCpublic domain
627 F.3d 85 (2010) WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., Appellant v. UPMC; Highmark, Inc. No. 09-4468. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued September 15, 2010. Filed: November 29, 2010. *91 Barak A. Bassman, James T. Giles, Barbara W. Mather (argued), Barbara T. Sicalides, Pepper Hamilton, Ph