Cases

976 F.Supp. 40 (1997) Iris RICHARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-02168(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 10, 1997. *41 John Wadie Hermina, Hermina & Hermina, Laurel, MD, for Iris Richard, Jonathan Barnes, Kareem Abdul-Ali, Ros

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2024-1264 ____________ JESSE BELL, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC2024-1556 ____________

11/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 9, 2020 Session ABU-ALI ABDUR’RAHMAN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 87-W-417 Monte Watkins, Judge ___________________________________

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0266p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ ABU-ALI ABDUR’RAHMAN, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │

946 F.Supp. 54 (1996) Iris RICHARD, Jonathan Barnes, Kareem Abdul-Ali, Rosalyn Baylor, Joseph Bishop, Jr., Edward Brooks, Alvera Bullock, Eric Burden, Wilbert Burgess, Michael Camp, James Carrington, Reginald Clark, Diann R. Cooper, Desta Daggett, Raymond Flowers, Clemantis Fortson, Michael Gillis, Faye Green, Kelvin Gunn, Syed Hassan, Brian Holloway, Marc Houston, Patrick Hunt, Elvin Jackson, Christopher Joseph, Kevin Logan, Vient Aries McKoy, Venida Me

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jian Bell Gao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the June 12, 2008 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Jian Bell Gao, No. A072 763 841 (B.I.A. June 12, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of dis

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jian Bell Gao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the June 12, 2008 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Jian Bell Gao, No. A072 763 841 (B.I.A. June 12, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of dis

595 F.Supp.2d 618 (2009) Ahmed ALI v. GIANT FOOD LLC/STOP AND SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY, LLC, et al. Civil Action No. DKC 2008-2117. United States District Court, D. Maryland. January 12, 2009. *619 Donnell H. McNeal, Law Office of Donnell H. McNeal, Clarksville, MD, for Ahmed Ali. *620

395 F.Supp.2d 527 (2005) Yusef ALI, as Administrator of the Estate of Marshall Marbly, Deceased Plaintiff v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE, et al, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 3:03CV-427-R. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. October 20, 2005. *528 *529 Bruce Garrett Anderson, Rob

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Carlos Coyomani entered the United States without inspection in 1997 and concedes that he is removable. 1 The question here is whether he is eligible for cancellation of removal. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) found him ineligible for that relief. Coyomani now petitions for review,

81 F.Supp.2d 447 (2000) Kareem ALI, Plaintiff, v. Officer SZABO, et al., Defendants. No. 98 Civ. 0424(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 13, 2000. *448 *449 I.M.S., Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Daniel A. Seymour, Bank, Sheer, Servino & Seymour, White Plains

SHEDD, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The categorical approach adopted by the majority is a doctrine created by the judicial branch to address issues of concern to the judicial branch — protection of Sixth Amendment rights and efficient use of judicial resources. Although an agency may choose to adopt some version of this approach, there is no requirement to expand this difficult, almost unworkable, limiting analy

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ Nos. 11-4200, 11-4201, 11-4315 ________________ No. 11-4200 ________________ AMBER BLUNT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated; CRYSTAL BLUNT; MICHAEL BLUNT, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated;

PER CURIAM: Robert Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. Johnson, Nos. 1:06-cv-00287-AMD; 1:06-cv-00807-AMD (D. Md. filed Jan. 19, 2007; entered Jan. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Everyone agrees that Ali Khan’s last year in federal jail was a mistake. After he finished serving his original sentence,he received an additional 168 months for violating parole from an earlier offense. But under the terms of Khan’s extradition from Canada, there was no authorit

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion (# 85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion (# 91) for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties each seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claim One of the Third Amended Complaint (# 83) (that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ right to procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment to the Uni

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion (# 85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion (# 91) for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ claims for procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution1 and the Administrative Procedures

PROCEEDINGS: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [33] GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Court hears oral argument. The Tentative circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court’s Final Ruling. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. A Scheduling Conference is set for May 14, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. Parties may appear telephonically provided that notice is giv

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VITALIANO, District Judge. Plaintiff Kamal Saleh brings this claim against three current or former executive department heads — Eric Holder, John Kerry, the Secretary of State, and Rand Beers, a former Acting Secretary of *137Homeland Security.1 This action is brought under the Ad

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Eric Amaro (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), Smyrna, Delaware, proceeds pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. When he commenced this action, plaintiff was a pretrial detainee at the Sussex Correctional Institution (“SCI”), Georgetown, Delaware. Plainti