Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Erica Marie Jackson”
Dunnet Bay Construction Compan v. Erica J. Borggrenpublic domain
TINDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Dunnet Bay Construction Company sued Defendants-Appellees Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and its then-Secretary of Transportation Gary Hannig in his official capacity, alleging that IDOT’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program discriminates on the basis of race. The district court granted summary judgment to Defend
Grimes v. Dist. of Columbiapublic domain
RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Decedent Karl Grimes ("K.G.") was a juvenile offender in Defendant District of Columbia's custody ("District"). On or about August 29, 2005, K.G. was committed to the Oak Hill Juvenile Detention Facility ("Oak Hill"). See Compl. ¶¶ 10, 17 ("Compl.") [Dkt. #1]. Decedent's mother Patricia Grimes ("Grimes" or "plaintiff") filed this suit alleging that on or about November 23, 2005,
Taylor v. District of Columbiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a motion for partial summary judgment by Defendants, the District of Columbia (hereinafter the “District”) and current and former District employees Olivia Golden, Lloyd J. Jordon, Elanor Sanders, Erica Sweeney, Judith Abunaw, I
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organizationpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Taylor v. District of Columbiapublic domain
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. This case is before the court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant the District of Columbia and defendants Golden, Jordon, Sanders, Sweeney, Abunaw, Walks, and Roberts (hereinafter “District employees”) [dkt. # 164] (“Mot. to Dismiss.”).
Hyson v. Jonespublic domain
163 S.W.3d 518 (2005) Marion L. HYSON, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant/Respondent, v. James W. JONES, and Defendant/Appellant, Shirley Ferguson, Defendant/Crossclaim Defendant, and James J. Below and Mary Below, Defendants/Counterclaimants/Crossclaimants/Appellants, and James J. Below and Mary Below, Defendants/Counterclaimants/Crossclaimants/Appellants, v. Phyllis Schwab, Personal Representative of the Estate of Beulah Green, Cr
Grimes v. District of Columbiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dkt. # 55) RICHARD J. LEON District Judge. Plaintiff Patricia Grimes (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against defendant District of Columbia (“DC”) for violation of the Eighth Amendment and negligent hiring, training, and supervision. Before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment fil
Langbehn v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADEpublic domain
661 F.Supp.2d 1326 (2009) Janice LANGBEHN, individually and as Representative of the Estate of Lisa Marie Pond, Danielle Langbehn-Pond, Katelyn Langbehn-Pond, and David Langbehn-Pond, Plaintiffs v. The PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, d/b/a Jackson Memorial Hospital, Garnett Frederick, Dr. Alois Zauner, and Dr. Carlos Alberto Cruz, Defendants. Case No. 08-21813-CIV. United States District Cour
Miller v. Monroe School Districtpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 7). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion for the r
Lora v. United Statespublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 453–464 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 16, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
State v. Kellypublic domain
STEELMAN, Judge. The State presented sufficient evidence to survive a motion to dismiss. We dismiss without prejudice defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant. Appellate counsel exceeded the limits of zealous advocacy for her client. I. Factual and Procedural History On 6 April 2009, Erica Kelly (defendant) was indicted fo
In re Application to the Bar of Statepublic domain
Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 15, 2018, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv
Moore v. Weeklypublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT H. CLELAND, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Sometime after midnight on May 16, 2015, members of the Special Response Team of the Detroit Police Department used a battering ram and a “flash-bang” grenade to initiate a high-stakes raid of a duplex residence located at 4054/4056 Lilli-bridge in order to apprehe
In re: S.C.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED In re S.C. December 10, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
Booth v. Statepublic domain
311 Ga. 374 FINAL COPY S21A0010. BOOTH v. THE STATE. ELLINGTON, Justice. A Jackson County jury found Tina Marie Booth guilty of felony murder and neglect to an elder person in connection with the death of Linda Cowart.1 On appeal, Booth contends that the trial court erred (1) by not declaring a mistrial after the jury returned mutually exclusive verdicts, and (2) by recalling the jury for deliberations after the jury was discharged. For the following reaso
Leslie Galloway, III a/k/a Leslie Galloway a/k/a Leslie "Bo" Galloway, III v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01427-SCT LESLIE GALLOWAY, III a/k/a LESLIE GALLOWAY a/k/a LESLIE “BO” GALLOWAY, III v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ANTHONY N. LAWRENCE, III NESHONDRIA DEQUANDRA ELLERBY
Leslie Galloway, III a/k/a Leslie Galloway a/k/a Leslie "Bo" Galloway, III v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01427-SCT LESLIE GALLOWAY, III a/k/a LESLIE GALLOWAY a/k/a LESLIE “BO” GALLOWAY, III v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ANTHONY N. LAWRENCE, III NESHONDRIA DEQUANDRA ELLERBY
In re E.O.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS In re E.O. FILED November 21, 2018 No. 18-0697 (Jackson County 17-JA-164) EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
Munawar v. Tibbspublic domain
KRAMER, Associate Judge: Appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error in reforming a deed to show appellee Lucien Franklin Tibbs (“Franklin”) as an owner of a certain multi-unit real estate property with rights of survivorship. We agree. I. The Facts In March 1989, the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) sold the subject premises to, and received a deed of trust s
Richard v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.public domain
4 F.Supp.2d 650 (1998) Rodney Wayne RICHARD and Mary Francis Douglas Richard, Individually and a/n/f of Danielle Erica Richard, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. FLEETWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Fleetwood Homes of Mississippi, Inc.,: United Homes, Inc., d/b/a United Mobile Homes Inc.; Ford Consumer Finance Co.; Carriage Industries, Inc.; Patrick Industries, Inc.; Georgia-Pacific Corp.; International Paper Co.; Weyerhaeuser Co.; Texas Manufactured Housing