Cases

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. Ill.; Sup. Ct. La.; Sup. Ct. Del.; Sup. Ct. Ala.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Sup. Ct. Ga.; Sup. Ct. Tenn.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; and Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 87-6189, 117 Ill. 2d 271, 513 N. E. 2d 367; No. 87-6287, 514 So. 2d 99; No. 87-6372, 534 A. 2d 630; No. 87-6601, 511 So. 2d 248; No. 87-6607, 743 S. W. 2d 5

Sup. Ct. Ill.; Sup. Ct. La.; Sup. Ct. Del.; Sup. Ct. Ala.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Sup. Ct. Ga.; Sup. Ct. Tenn.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; and Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 87-6189, 117 Ill. 2d 271, 513 N. E. 2d 367; No. 87-6287, 514 So. 2d 99; No. 87-6372, 534 A. 2d 630; No. 87-6601, 511 So. 2d 248; No. 87-6607, 743 S. W. 2d 5

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-17, is an exercise of power under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which confers authority “to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions *947of this article.” Defendant in this suit is an arm of Illinois and therefore one of the United States

911 F.Supp. 316 (1995) Melinda ERICKSON, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES FOR NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. 95 C 2541. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 18, 1995. *317 Terrance Anthony Norton, IIT-Kent Law Offices, Chicago, IL, for plaintif

App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.

JUSTICE McMORROW, dissenting: I believe that defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to prove his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Accordingly, I dissent. Defendant’s conviction and sentence of death were affirmed by this court on direct appeal. People v. Erickson, 117 Il

216 B.R. 938 (1998) In re Glen R. ERICKSON, Lisa A. Erickson, Debtors. Glen R. ERICKSON and Lisa A. Erickson, Plaintiffs, v. CITIZENS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRINCETON, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 97-82641, Adversary No. 97-8171. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois. January 21, 1998. *939 James Brannon, Peoria, IL, for

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3332 JOHN SABO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEGAN ERICKSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the East

*316OPINION WRIGHT, Justice. Appellant Timothy Michael Erickson challenges the summary denial of his second petition for postconviction relief arising out of the March 22, 1988 murder of Donald Gall. Because the postconviction court did not err, we affirm. In the early hours of March 22, 1988, Gall was brutally murdered while campin

Robb, Judge. Case Summary and Issues Following a jury trial, Jeremiah Erickson was convicted of dealing in a Schedule IV controlled substance, a Level 3 felony, and the trial court sentenced him to fourteen years in the Indiana Department of Correction. Erickson now appeals, raising three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as: (1) wh

JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the opinion of the court: After waiving the jury that had convicted him, defendant was sentenced to death for raping Elizabeth Launer, murdering her, and concealing the homicide. This court affirmed the convictions and sentence on direct appeal. (People v. Erickson (1987), 117 Ill. 2d 271.) After the United St

JUSTICE McKINNON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 The State charged Kenneth Erickson in the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Hill County, with aggravated assault or, in the *86 alternative, criminal endangerment. Erickson gave n

639 N.E.2d 979 (1994) 266 Ill.App.3d 273 203 Ill.Dec. 420 PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Erica L. ERICKSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-93-0883. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. August 30, 1994. *980 Michael P. Coghlan, DeKalb County State's Atty

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3332 JOHN SABO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEGAN ERICKSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the East

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3332 JOHN SABO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEGAN ERICKSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the East

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3332 JOHN SABO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEGAN ERICKSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the East

JUSTICE LYTTON delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, John M. Norwick, was convicted of the offenses of driving under the influence of alcohol (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 95½, par. 11—501(a)(1)) and unlawful use of weapons (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 24—1(a)(4)). He was assessed fines for both offenses and sentenced to one year of court supervision for unlawful

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3332 JOHN SABO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEGAN ERICKSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter