Cases

C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, *914American Association of Health Plans, Inc., et al., and ERISA Industry Committee for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, *914American Association of Health Plans, Inc., et al., and ERISA Industry Committee for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

91 F.Supp.2d 860 (1999) ERIE COUNTY RETIREES ASSOCIATION and Lyman H. Cohen, for himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA and Erie County Employees' Retirement Board, Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-272. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division. September 30, 1999.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. Presently pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Add Class Members [Doc. No. 65]. For the reasons set forth below, this motion will be denied. Plaintiffs in this action are Medicare-eligible retirees of Erie County, Pennsylvania. They commenced this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

192 F.Supp.2d 369 (2002) ERIE COUNTY RETIREES ASSOCIATION and Lyman H. Cohen, for himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA and Erie County Employees' Retirement Board, Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-272 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 20, 2002. *370 R

166 F.Supp.2d 310 (2001) ERIE COUNTY RETIREES ASSOCIATION and Lyman H. Cohen, for himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA and Erie County Employees' Retirement Board, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 98-272 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. August 23, 2001. Daniel J. Pastore, Fairview, PA, for plaintiffs

140 F.Supp.2d 466 (2001) ERIE COUNTY RETIREES ASSOCIATION and Lyman H. Cohen, for himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. The COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA and Erie County Employees' Retirement Board, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 98-272 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. April 16, 2001. *467

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes on before this court on appeal from an order of the district court entered September 30, 1999, granting partial summary judgment in favor of the County of Erie, Pennsylvania (the “County”), dismissing appellants’ claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. See Eri

220 F.3d 193 (3rd Cir. 2000) ERIE COUNTY RETIREES ASSOCIATION and LYMAN H. COHEN, for himself and all others similarly situatedv.THE COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA and ERIE COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT BOARDErie County Retirees Association and Lyman H. Cohen, as representative and on behalf of the class, Appellants (D.C. Civ. No. 98-272) No. 99-3877 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

166 F.Supp.2d 313 (2001) ERIE COUNTY RETIREES ASSOCIATION and Lyman H. Cohen, for himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The COUNTY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA and Erie County Employees' Retirement Board, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 98-272 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. August 23, 2001. Daniel J. Pastore, Fairview, PA, for plaintiffs

14-1634-cv(L) MHANY Mgmt., Inc. v. Cty of Nassau et al. 14‐1634‐cv(L) MHANY Mgmt., Inc. v. Cty. of Nassau et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2014 6 7 (Argu

POPOVICH, Judge: This case involves an appeal by the plaintiff/appellant, Gerald A. Snyder, from the August 29, 1988, order1 of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County sustaining a preliminary objection raising a question of jurisdiction. We affirm in part and reverse in part. Following the presentment of a praecipe for the issuance of a writ of summons and a rule to file a c

534 F.Supp.2d 546 (2008) Joseph E. HUDAK, Plaintiff, v. TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-104 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. January 25, 2008. *547 *548 *549 *550

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEON, District Judge. There are seven stockholder derivative actions that have been filed by individual and institutional plaintiffs in this Court.1 Currently pending before the Court are various parties’ motions to consolidate the actions and for appointment of a leadership structure. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the parties

Armstrong v Town of Tonawanda (2023 NY Slip Op 01372) Armstrong v Town of Tonawanda 2023 NY Slip Op 01372 Decided on March 17, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

305 F.Supp.2d 491 (2003) In re RENT-WAY SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 00-323 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 22, 2003. *492 *493 *494 *495 *496 Bruce

960 A.2d 904 (2008) MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP POLICE ASSOCIATION, Appellant v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP. No. 433 C.D. 2008. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 14, 2008. Decided November 21, 2008. *905 Eric C. Stoltenberg, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Richard W. Perhacs, Erie, for appellee. BEFORE:

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered July 7, 2015. The order denied defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement entered between the parties and to dismiss the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendant’s motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed. Memorandum: Plainti

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered July 7, 2015. The order denied defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement entered between the parties and to dismiss the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendant’s motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed. Memorandum: Plainti

95 F.Supp.2d 290 (1997) LAZY OIL, CO., John B. Andreassi, Thomas A. Miller Oil Co., and Wynnewood Drilling Associates, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WITCO CORPORATION, Pennzoil Company, and Pennzoil Products Company, Defendants. No. CIV.A.94-110 ERIE. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 31, 1997.