Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Erik U. Lasater”
Santistevan v. City of Colorado Springspublic domain
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court are two motions for summary judgment: (1) the City Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [filed August 81, 2012; docket # 126 ] filed by Defendants Richard Meyers, Jimmy Rodgers, Jackson Andrews, and the City of Colorado Springs (collectively, the “City Defendants”); and (2) the
Doe v. Salisbury Universitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. This action was brought by John, Doe and. Richard Roe (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Salisbury University (“SU”), Valerie Randall-Lee,1 Helena Hill,2 Jane Doe # 1, Jane Poe # 2, and Jane Doe # 3 (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“ÍIE
United Industries Corp. v. Clorox Co.public domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. The Clorox Company appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of its motion for preliminary injunctive relief brought within the context of its counterclaim against United Industries Corporation for false advertising under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). We affirm.
VDARE Foundation v. City of Colorado Springspublic domain
Appellate Case: 20-1162 Document: 010110565027 Date Filed: 08/23/2021 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 23, 2021