Cases

03/06/2018 DA 17-0474 Case Number: DA 17-0474 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2018 MT 39N IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: SARA EPPS O’CONNOR, Petitioner and Appellant, and

626 F.3d 789 (2010) APACHE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W & T OFFSHORE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-31122. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 16, 2010. *791 Scott Allen O'Connor, Dana Erin Dupre, Gordon, Arata, McCollam, Duplantis & Eagan, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, Roger Dale Townsend (arg

260 F.Supp.2d 545 (2003) Erin O'CONNOR, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES FENCING ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 02-CV-5540(ERK). United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 5, 2003. *546 Gary Port, Cedarhurst, NY, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM & ORDER KORMAN, Chief Judge Plaintiff, Erinn O'c

SERCOMBE, P. J. This case presents similar issues to those we considered in Kinkel v. Persson, 276 Or App 427, 367 P3d 956, rev allowed, 359 Or 525 (2016). In 1994, when he was 16 years old, petitioner participated in the kidnapping, robbery, and killing of two people. He was waived into adult court and, based on a stipulated facts trial, was convicted of two counts of aggravated murder, two counts of first-d

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} On August 16, 2010, the relator, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, filed a three-count complaint against Kevin Thomas Toohig, Attorney Registration No. 0067447, last known address in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, for violating the *549 Ru

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court are: (1) Defendant Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America, Inc.'s ("MITAC America") motion to dismiss certain claims (MITACA MTD (Dkt. # 54)); and (2) Defendants Aerospace Testing Engineering & Certification, Inc. ("AeroTEC"), Michel Korwin-Szymanowski, Laurus Basson, and Cindy Dornéval's (collectively, "AeroTEC Defe

Lanzinger, J. {¶ 1} Relators, the Cincinnati Enquirer (“Enquirer”); Scripps Media, Inc., d.b.a. WCPO-TV (“WCPO”); the Associated Press (“AP”); Raycom Media, d.b.a. WXIX-TV (“WXIX”); Hearst Corporation, d.b.a. WLWT-TV (“WLWT”); and Sinclair Media III, Inc., d.b.a. WKRC-TV (“WKRC”) (collectively, “relators”), filed this original action in mandamus seeking the release of the video fr

LAWSON, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that binding legal precedent and the statutes we must follow permit the result reached by the majority. In explaining my reasons for reaching this conclusion, I will first discuss legal principles about which the majority and I seem to agree. The majority dismisses the cases setting forth these principles as distinguishable, and I generally

O'Donnell, J., dissents, with an opinion joined by French, J. Kennedy, J., dissents. O'Donnell, J., dissenting. *304 {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision to resolve this case by declaring that it was i

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In this expedited election case, we consider a challenge to George Maier’s appearance on the primary ballot for Stark County sheriff. Last year, we ousted Maier from that same office. State ex rel. Swanson v. Maier, 137 Ohio St.3d 400, 2013-Ohio-4767, 999 N.E.2d 639. After his ouster, Maier obta

Cuéllar, J. *154 Under California law, a brand-name drug manufacturer has a duty to warn of known or reasonably knowable adverse effects arising from an individual's use of its drug. (See Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1973)

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: New York State - like the rest of our Nation - is in the grips of an opioid *243epidemic. To counter that epidemic, New York has taken proactive measures to treat existing opioid addiction, to prevent future addiction, and to educate New Yorkers about the dangers of opioid dependence. The centerpiece of

316 F.Supp.2d 693 (2004) PRIMA TEK II, L.L.C. and Southpac Trust Int'l, as Trustee for the Family Trust U/T/A dated 12/8/95, Plaintiffs, v. POLYPAP SARL, a French Corporation, Philippe Charrin, and Andre Charrin, Defendants. No. 99-CV-0220-MJR. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. April 30, 2004. *694

John Z. Lee, United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Lu Aku ("Aku") filed this pro se lawsuit against his former employer, the Board of Education of the City of Chicago ("the Board"), D'Andre Weaver ("Weaver"), the principal at the school where Aku taught until 2014, and thirteen other defendants ("Non-Board Defendants"). Aku claims that the Board discrim

471 B.R. 354 (2012) In re AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al., Debtors. George L. Miller, Trustee Plaintiff, v. Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-10203 (MFW). Adversary No. 06-50826 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Relators, Cincinnati for Pension Reform and electors Douglas Robinson and Gary Greenberg (collectively, “CPR”) qualified an initiative to amend the Cincinnati City Charter for the November 5, 2013 ballot. However, CPR objects to the ballot language adopted by respondent Hamilton County Board of Elections to describe

No. 302 April 15, 2026 481 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of L. D., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, and L. D., Respondent, v. T. S., Appellant.

716 F.Supp.2d 270 (2010) W.T. and K.T. on behalf of J.T., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY, Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 1368(FM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 15, 2010. *273 Gary S. Mayerson, Mayerson and Associates, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. David Alan Rosinus,

No. 302 April 15, 2026 481 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of L. D., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, and L. D., Respondent, v. T. S., Appellant.

Rubin, J. This case involves a dispute about property in Chatham. We summarize the facts, relying on the findings made by the Superior Court judge following a jury-waived trial, and supplementing where necessary by undisputed record evidence. A. Procedural background. T.W. Nickerson, Inc. (plaintiff), is ■ a Massachusetts corporation that operates a “stump dump” business on the subject property.