Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Bulent Ertur appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of Carol Edward, Carol L. Edward P.S., Edward’s professional service corporation, and Jesse F. Berger in this legal malpractice case. We affirm. Summary judgment was appropriate because Ertur adduced no admissible evidence supporting his contention that Edward’s decision not to pursue a relief for Ertur under the V

Case: 22-1755 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 09/06/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PARKERVISION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, QUALCOMM ATHEROS, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-1755, 2024-2221 ______________________

Sharpnack, Senior Judge Statement of the Case Judith Edwards Klemos appeals from the dissolution court’s order granting D. Juatrice Edwards’ “Motion to Vacate Hearing and Orders Restraining Assets.” The court concluded that after the death of Allen O. Edwards, it no longer had jurisdiction over the disbursement of Allen’s

Case: 22-1755 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 09/06/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PARKERVISION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, QUALCOMM ATHEROS, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-1755, 2024-2221 ______________________

*76MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, D.J. I.INTRODUCTION On May 15, 2008, petitioner Patrick O’Shea was convicted of being a Felon in Possession of a Firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The maximum penalty for that offense is ordinarily ten years. However, the court sentenced him to the fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence req

ORDER DETERMINING DEBT TO BE DISCHARGEABLE LEONARD C. GARTNER, Bankruptcy Judge. This cause came on to be heard upon the complaint of plaintiff, filed September 24, 1980, objecting to the dischargeability of its debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a); upon the answer of the defendant filed November 28, 1980, and upon the testimony and the exhibits. 11 U.S.C. § 523(a) provides in pertinent

Mr. Justice Fortas delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents an aspect of the continuing problem of the interaction of federal and state laws in our complex federal system. Specifically, the question presented is whether, in the circumstances of this case, the Federal Government, in its zealous pursuit of the balance due on a disaster loan made by the Small Business Administration, may obtain jud

Clark, C. J. On 6 April, 1908, tbe plaintiff, wbo owned 46 shares of stock in tbe Edenton Cotton Mills, delivered same to C. W. Rea, ber husband having indorsed on tbe certificate as follows: For value received, I hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto C. W. Rea tbe shares of stock represented by tbe within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint W. O. Elliott, secretary, attorn

WALKER, J. ' This was an action in trespass to try title, filed the 26tli day of August, 1030, by the heirs of Cynthia C. Frazier against Temple Lumber Company, involving a tract of 640 acres of land in Jasper county, patented to Cynthia C. Frazier on the 8th day of March, 1848. Temple Lumber Company answered by general demurrer, general denial, pleas of not guilty, and the several statutes of limitations, and by cross-action

Mr. Justice Snyder delivered the opinion of the court. This case is with us for the second time. On a previous occasion, we heard it on certiorari to the Court of Tax Appeals with reference to jurisdictional and procedural questions. 60 P.R.R. 749. It is now here on the merits by virtue of a second writ of certiorari. On March 15, 1941 petitioner and his wife filed separate income tax returns

Dillon, J. 1. Surety: absolute liability. I. The husband, according to his own testimony, purchased the property prior to his marriage, and was let into actual possession and enjoyment of . - _ - , , it, and by his consent, it not by his request, the bond was taken in the name of his wife. Having, under these circumstances, executed the. note in suit, he was liable thereon. The finding by the jury, of a

JUDGE TUCKER. William Black, sometime about the year 1760, purchased of Allen M’Rae, a lot with some buildings thereon, in Alexandria ; the consideration paid by Black does not appear ; but that it was a purchase, for a valuable consideration, seems not to have been questioned. In February, 1762, Black intermarried with the complainant, Mrs. Claiborne : at this time he appears to have been in actual possession of the lot, which

JUDGE TUCKER. William Black, sometime about the year 1760, purchased of Allen M’Rae, a lot with some buildings thereon, in Alexandria ; the consideration paid by Black does not appear ; but that it was a purchase, for a valuable consideration, seems not to have been questioned. In February, 1762, Black intermarried with the complainant, Mrs. Claiborne : at this time he appears to have been in actual possession of the lot, which

JUDGE TUCKER. William Black, sometime about the year 1760, purchased of Allen M’Rae, a lot with some buildings thereon, in Alexandria ; the consideration paid by Black does not appear ; but that it was a purchase, for a valuable consideration, seems not to have been questioned. In February, 1762, Black intermarried with the complainant, Mrs. Claiborne : at this time he appears to have been in actual possession of the lot, which