Cases

02-10-326-CV

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00326-CV VINCENT PAUL PEREZ APPELLANT V. ESPERANZA ISABEL PEREZ APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, July 20, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A26I0259. CINDY MAIRENA-PEREZ et al. v. ESPERANZA RAMIREZ VILLALOBOS. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 25P2216 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

USCA1 Opinion For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 96-1904 LA ESPERANZA DE P.R., INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. PEREZ Y CIA. DE PUERTO RICO, INC.,

NUMBER 13-98-561-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ____________________________________________________________________ FILIBERTO PEREZ, JR. AND PAULA T. PEREZ, Appellants,

*698 GROSS, J. As a result of a fraudulent scheme, two banks took possession of nearly identical promissory notes secured by the same mortgage. The underlying transaction contemplated just one note. After payments stopped, both banks sought to foreclose. The question before us asks which bank may proceed?

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Brooks Banker appeals from a decision of the United States *15District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mukasey, J.) granting defendants-appellees’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Banker v. Esperanza Health Sys., Ltd., No. 05 Civ. 4115, 2005 WL 3077513 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2005). We affirm the decision o

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1464 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1465 OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Joe Reyes Perez appeals from a ju

STAHL, Circuit Judge. This consolidated admiralty case involves a dispute between a shipowner and a shipyard over repairs to a vessel, S/V LA ESPERANZA, that were begun but never completed. It comes to us on cross-appeals following a bench trial in which the district court entered judgment, first, in favor of Perez y Cia de Puerto Rico, Inc. (“the shipyard” o

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GIERBOLINI, Senior District Judge. This consolidated admiralty action results from work performed on the passenger vessel S/V “La Esperanza” by plaintiff and crossdefendant Pérez y Cia. de Puerto Rico (“Pérez y Cia.”) at its shipyard facilities beginning on March 17, 1994. Pérez y Cia. claims that it performed the work requested by La Esperanza de Puerto Rico, Inc.

NUMBER 13-99-114-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAM, INC., D/B/A TEXAS SKY PROGRAM, INC., AND <

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant Nueva Esperanza, Inc., a nonprofit corporation based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, applied to the Federal Communications Commission in 2013 for a license to construct and operate a Low Power FM Radio (LPFM) station in Philadelphia. The Media Bureau of the Commission dismissed the Appellant’s application. The Commission affirmed,

Justice RODRIGUEZ delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, Justice BAKER and Justice JEFFERSON join. Carlos Gil-Perez sued Southwest Key Program, Inc., d/b/a Texas Key Program, Inc., and La Esperanza Home for Boys (collectively “Southwest Key”) for damages arising from a knee injury he sustained during an impromp

79 S.W.3d 571 (2000) SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAM, INC., d/b/a Texas Sky Program, Inc., and La Esperanza Home for Boys, Appellant, v. Carlo GIL-PEREZ, Appellee. No. 13-99-114-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. November 9, 2000. *574 Kevin D. Jewell, Magenheim, Bateman & Helfand, Houston, for Appellant.

Perez v Table Run Estates, Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 00533) Perez v Table Run Estates, Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 00533 Decided on February 02, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

Perez v Table Run Estates, Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 00533) Perez v Table Run Estates, Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 00533 Decided on February 02, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

OPINION Vigil, Chief Judge. {1} The State appeals the district court’s order excluding the testimony of an eight-year-old girl (C.S.) in a case alleging multiple counts of sexual abuse against her by Defendant-Appellee Armando Perez (Defendant) on the basis that C.S. was incompetent to testify as a witness. This case prese

MEMORANDUM *** Juan Hector Perez Garcia, his wife Esperanza Perez and their daughter Maria Isabel Ayala Mendoza, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal and its order denying Perez Garcia’s and Esperanza Perez’s requests for voluntary departur

71 Cal.App.3d 923 (1977) 138 Cal. Rptr. 32 CASIMIRO F. PEREZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Defendant and Respondent; ESPERANZA VERA COLIN et al., Movants and Appellants. Docket No. 50057. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two. July 25, 1977. *924 COUNSEL