Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Esther M Stribling”
Tirumali v. City of Portlandpublic domain
7 P.3d 761 (2000) 169 Or. App. 241 Nagendra TIRUMALI; Parimali Tirumali; Kateland Wells; Tony Milhizer; Connie Kiener; Geoff Levear; Joyce Levear; Eiko Politz; Wes Ross; Dorothy Ross; Gail Ingalesbe; Russ Carson and Esther Tolls, Petitioners, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent. Jerry L. Ward; Nancy A. Ward; Nagendra Tirumali; Parimali Tirumali; Kateland Wells; Tony Milhizer; Connie Kiener; Geoff Levear; Joyce Levear; Eiko
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. McShanpublic domain
577 F.Supp. 165 (1983) METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. James E. McSHAN, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, Esther M. McShan, Third-Party Defendant. No. C-82-6890 RFP. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 13, 1983. Richard J. Kilmartin, Knight, Boland & Riordan, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff. Richard
Buford v. Chicago Housing Authoritypublic domain
131 Ill. App.3d 235 (1985) 476 N.E.2d 427 DEMETICA BUFORD, a Minor, by her Mother and Next Friend, Annie Buford, Plaintiff-Appellee and Appellant, v. THE CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee (Otis Elevator Company, Defendant-Appellant). No. 83-1914. Illinois Appellate Court First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed February 11, 1985.
Butler v. Butlerpublic domain
ANDERSON, Judge. This is an appeal from an order and judgment, entered in a divorce proceeding, awarding Esther L. Butler, plaintiff in said action, the sum of $250.00 per month alimony pendente lite. The appellant is Henry J. Butler, defendant below. Plaintiff filed the suit on October 17, 1961. The petition alleged general indignities and the separation of the parties on September 10, 1961. There was a
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Potterpublic domain
The question presented on these appeals is whether the doctrine of federal preemption applies, specifically, whether federal law allowed a former husband to change the beneficiary on a Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) policy, even though a state circuit court, in a divorce proceeding, had ordered him to maintain his former wife as the sole beneficiary. The learned trial judge, in a lengthy judgment, determined that "the effect of a provision in a decree of divorc
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Bauer v. Bauerpublic domain
Frederick Bauer died intestate in Greene county, Iowa, in September, 1929, holding 1,079 acres of land. He left a widow, Esther A. Bauer, and the following sons and daughters surviving him, to wit: Edith B. Stribling, William R. Bauer, Edward C. Bauer, Fred O. Bauer, Clarence R. Bauer, Nora B. Gower, Clara M. Fisher, Ella B. Weant, and Beulah B. Elmore. The action in this case was to quiet title to all the various *Page 784 tracts of land comprisin
The opinion of the court was delivered by Hopkins, J.: The action was one to recover on a policy of fraternal insurance. It was before this court on a previous occasion on the question of the right of the intervener to interplead. (Lodge v. Order of Commercial Travelers, 120 Kan. 439, 244 Pac. 4.) The plaintiff prevailed and the defendant and intervener appeal. The facts are substantia
Escondido Resources II, LLC v. Justapor Ranch, L.C.public domain
ACCEPTED 04-14-00905-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Carver v. Carverpublic domain
Zollars, J. Action by appellee in relation to real estate; verdict in her favor, and over a motion for a new trial and other motions, judgment upon the verdict that she is the-*499owner, and entitled to the possession, of the undivided one-third of the real estate, and for $125 against appellant William Carver for the detention thereof. Many alleged err