Cases

Smith, P. J., In the instant proceeding defendants, Irl Hill, et al., duly filed in this court an appeal and exceptions to an adjudication dated January 4,1950, made by the Secretary of Agriculture of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (hereinafter sometimes called the secretary). In the adjudication the secretary denied petitions filed by a group of herd owners of cattle in Crawford County requesting that the area plan for the con

15 A.3d 431 (2011) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Donyell A. PADDY, Appellant. No. 478 CAP. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted January 14, 2008. Decided March 30, 2011. *439 Shawn Nolan, for Donyell Paddy. Hugh J. Burns Jr., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Amy Zapp, Harrisburg, fo

Filed 8/25/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S049596 v. ) ) STANLEY BRYANT, DONALD ) FRANKLIN SMITH and LEROY ) WHEELER, ) )

744 F.Supp. 1323 (1990) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, Reproductive Health and Counselling Center, Women's Health Services, Inc., Women's Suburban Clinic, Allentown Women's Center, and Thomas Allen, M.D., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Robert P. CASEY, N. Mark Richards, Ernest Preate, personally and in their official capacities, and Michael D. Marino, personally and in his official capacit

WICKERSHAM, J„ — On Sunday, August 1, 1971, a member of the Harrisburg City Police Department, while on routine patrol on Third Street, witnessed an automobile weaving from lane to lane. The operator was defendant, James Joseph Kiely. When stopped by the police, defendant had difficulty exiting from his vehicle, stumbled and fell out of the car. The investigating officers detected the odor of alcohol on his breath. He was given a

OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. The present controversy inhabits the twilight area of developing law concerning the constitutional rights of the involuntarily committed mentally retarded. Nicholas Romeo appeals, through his next friend, from a jury verdict for the defendants, officials of the Pennhurst State School and Hospital, in a suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976). Plaintiff alleg

644 F.2d 147 7 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 674 ROMEO, Nicholas, an incompetent, by his mother and nextfriend, Paula Romeo, Appellant,v.Duane YOUNGBERG, individually and in his official capacityas Superintendent, Pennhurst State School and Hospital, andRichard Matthews, individually and in his official capacityas Director of Resident Life, Pennhurst State School andHospital, and Marguerite Conley, ind

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from an order granting class action injunctive relief against the continued maintenance of Pennhurst State School and Hospital (Pennhurst), a facility for the care and training of persons suffering mental retardation. Located in Spring City, Pennsylvania, Pennhurst is operated under the direction of the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. T

*327ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 1992, after review of the Record and due consideration of the Briefs and Arguments,1 the Court accepts the Report of the Judicial Inquiry and Review Board submitted by Judge Joseph M. James, Judge Jess Juliante, Judge John T.J. Kelly, Jr., and Judge Frank J. Montemur

612 F.2d 84 Terri Lee HALDERMAN, a retarded citizen, by her mother andguardian, Winifred Halderman; Larry Taylor, a retardedcitizen, by his parents and guardians, Elmer and DorisTaylor; Kenny Taylor, a minor, a retarded citizen, by hisparents and guardians, Elmer and Doris Taylor; RobertSobetsky, a minor, a retarded citizen, by his parents andguardians, Frank and Angela Sobetsky; Theresa Sobetsky, aretarded citizen, by h

Argued May 23, 1932. The railroad companies, which are defendants in this case, appeal from a decree enjoining them from putting into force proposed new tariffs, in so far as they prescribe higher intrastate rates for carrying freight of the same class to a nearer station than for carrying it on the same tracks in the same direction to a more distant *Page 278 station, all the trackage being within this Commonwealth. The court below decided that to permit

Dissenting Opinion by Mr. Justice Bell: Congress has never once said that Pennsylvania’s law or any State law on Sedition was superseded or invalidated; the Suprenie Court of the.United States *77has never said so; if there could be auy doubt on the question — and in my opinion there is none — it should certainly not be resolved in favor of f

SANBORN, Circuit Judge. In the year 1906 the Northern Pacific Railway Company, the Great Northern Railway Company, and the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Company were carrying passengers and freight within, through, and without the state of Minnesota for legal fares, rates, and charges which had been established, filed and published in accordance with the provisions of the act of Congress entitled “An act to regulate comme

Me. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court. These suits were brought by stockholders of the Northern Pacific Railway Company, the Great Northern Railway Company and the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad Company, respectively, to restrain the enforcement of two orders of the Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota and two acts of the legislature of that State prescribing maximum c

230 U.S. 352 (1913) THE MINNESOTA RATE CASES. SIMPSON ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA v. SHEPARD. SAME v. KENNEDY. SAME v. SHILLABER. Nos. 291, 292, 293. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 9, 10, 11, 12, 1912. Decided June 9, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT