Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Everette Marshall”
Everette v. Marshallpublic domain
701 F.2d 176 Everettev.Marshall 82-3080 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 4/26/82 S.D.Ohio APPEAL DISMISSED
Garrett v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.
Everette v. Mitchempublic domain
MEMORANDUM Catherine C. Blake, United States District Judge Alicia Everette seeks to bring a class action lawsuit against Joshua Mitchem; Jeremy -Shaffer; Scott Tucker; NDG Financial Corporation; MobiLoans, LLC (“MobiLoans”); and Riverbend Finance, LLC (“Riverbend”) on behalf of consumers who received payday loans between May I, 2012, and May 1, 2015, from the following companies: Action Payday, Bottom Dollar
Marshall v. Ricepublic domain
ORDER BUCKLEW, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Defendants’ Objections to U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Order Quashing Trial Objections and Excluding Witnesses (Doc. No. 173, filed November 1, 2002). Plaintiff has responded to Defendants’ Objections (Doc. No. 178, filed November 6, 2002). Upon consideration of Defendants’ Objections, Plaintiff
Marshall v. Mercury Finance Co.public domain
Plaintiff finance company recovered a judgment against the debtor for the balance due under a delinquent note and for the possession of the pledged vehicle, and the debtor appeals. To paraphrase debtor's brief, he asserts on appeal that the trial court palpably abused its discretion in: (1) failing to find the interest rate of 29.48% to be usurious and (2) failing to find the terms of the note to be unconscionable. The largely undisputed facts reveal that the debtor purc
Marshall v. Kansas City Southern Railways Co.public domain
7 So.3d 210 (2009) Merlean MARSHALL, Alphonzo Marshall and Eric Shepard, individually and on behalf of all Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Lucy Shepard, Deceased v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAYS COMPANY, Eric W. Robinson, The Estate of Robert Everett and C.L. Duett. No. 2006-CT-00519-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. March 5, 2009. Rehearing Denied May 7, 2009
Everett Marshall Garrett v. State of Floridapublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-1924 _____________________________ EVERETT MARSHALL GARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge. September 27, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ROBERTS, R
Marshall v. Kansas City Southern Railways Co.public domain
7 So.3d 265 (2007) Merlean MARSHALL, Alphonzo Marshall and Eric Shepard, Individually and on behalf of all Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Lucy Shepard, Deceased, Appellants v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAYS COMPANY, Eric W. Robinson, The Estate of Robert Everett and C.L. Duett, Appellees. No. 2006-CA-00519-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. November 6, 2007.
Kevin L. Marshall v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 13, 2004 KEVIN L. MARSHALL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 31690 L. Craig Johnson, Judge No. M2004-01077-CCA-R3-HC -Filed October 29, 2004 The petitioner, Kevin L. Marshall, appeals the dismissal of his motion to c
Marshall v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.public domain
372 F.Supp.2d 916 (2005) Merlean MARSHALL, Alphonzo Marshall, and Eric Shepard, Individually and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Lucy R. Shepard, Deceased Plaintiffs v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Eric W. Robinson, the Estate of Robert E. Everett, C.L. Duett and John Does 1 Through 10 Defendants No. CIV.A. 3:04CV871BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson D
United States v. Marshallpublic domain
EVERETT, Senior Judge (concurring): In my view, if an accused receives and relies on grossly erroneous and incompetent advice from counsel that leads him to request — and be provided — trial by court-martial rather than nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, he will have a Sixth Amendment claim requiring application of the Strickland v. Washington, 4
Marshall v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.public domain
PER CURIAM: On appeal, Plaintiffs-Appellants identified in the caption of this case (“Plaintiffs”) challenge the district court’s denial of their motion for remand to state court. The district court had ruled that the non-diverse defendants were fraudulently joined and refused to certify an interlocutory appeal of that ruling to us.
Ebony Marshall v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
06/10/2022 THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 8, 2022 EBONY MARSHALL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 13-05966, 13-05021 Jennifer Mitchell, Judge No. W2021-01131-CCA-R3-PC The
Marshall v. Courvelle Toyotapublic domain
PETERS, J. hThe plaintiff in this workers’ compensation case, Herbert Marshall, appeals the judgment of the workers! compensation judge (WCJ) dismissing his claim for benefits against his employer, Courvelle Toyota. For the following reasons, we reverse the WCJ’s judgment and render judgment in favor of Mr. Marshall, awarding him benefits, penalties, and attorney fees.
Marshall S. Hicks v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14-00337-CR MARSHALL S. HICKS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas
State of Tennessee v. Matthew Marshallpublic domain
09/20/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 22, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MATTHEW MARSHALL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bledsoe County No. 2012-CR-38 Buddy D. Perry, Judge No. E2017-01933-CCA-R3-CD A Bledsoe Co
Marshall v. Burkepublic domain
LYNN, J. The plaintiffs, Alfred and Susan Marshall, appeal an order of the Superior Court {Honran, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants1 on the plaintiffs’ claim to a prescriptive easement over defendants’ beach front property (the “Beach Lot”) on Lake Ossipee. We reverse and remand. The summary judgment record reveals the following pertinent facts. The
Marshall v. Statepublic domain
AFFIRMED. SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and WALKER, LEE, BOWLING and HAWKINS, JJ., concur. *Page 730
Finigan v. Marshallpublic domain
574 F.3d 57 (2009) Geneva FINIGAN, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. William E. MARSHALL, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff of the County of Saratoga, New York, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant.[*] Docket No. 07-0964-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: January 6, 2009. Decided: July 28, 2009
Marshall v. Showalterpublic domain
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge. The petitioner herein was adjudged a bankrupt by the Referee in an involuntary proceeding and the matter is before this Court for review. The Referee has certified two questions. They are: 1. Was the transfer or assignment by Petitioner to his wife of his undivided one-half interest in a promissory purchase money note fraudulent, and made to hinder and delay his creditors