Cases

238 B.R. 507 (1999) In re Vivian REYES, Debtor. Vivian Reyes, Plaintiff, v. FCC National Bank, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96-10402. Adversary No. 98-1064. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island. July 13, 1999. Christopher Lefebvre, Law Office of Claude Lefebvre & Sons, Pawtucket, RI, for debtor/plaintiff. Robert D. Fine, Robert Berkelhammer, C

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC. v. HILL2023 OK 86Case Number: 118680Decided: 09/12/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 86, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC. v. HILL2023 OK 86Case Number: 118680Decided: 09/12/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 86, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

OSCN Found Document:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC. v. HILL Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

MEMORANDUM OPINION FRANK W. ROGER, Chief Judge. Debtor filed his petition for relief under Chapter 7 on August 29, 1989. November 21, 1989 was established as the filing deadline for 11 U.S.C. § 523(c) and 11 U.S.C. § 727 complaints. First Chicago Credit Card requested an extension on said deadline and received it. First Chicago filed a complaint in two counts under 11 U.S.C. § 523. Count I alleged that de

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 2, 2000 Decided March 17, 2000 No. 99-1176 GTE Service Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents NorthPoint Communic

131 F.3d 1044 327 U.S.App.D.C. 390, 10 Communications Reg.(P&F) 494 BELL ATLANTIC TELEPHONE COMPANIES, et al., Petitioners,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States ofAmerica, Respondents,AT&T Corporation, et al., Intervenors. No. 97-1432. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Arg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00852 (CJN) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are five aliens and three organizations whose memb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. (BAH) 18-1076 v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell BENJAMIN C. CARSON, SR., M.D., in his official capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Develop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION, et al., Civil Action No. 20-2074 (BAH) Plaintiffs, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. Background ... 308 II. Applicable Legal Standards .. .310 III. Analysis ... 311 *308 A.

INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC

OPINION SHIPP, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon several motions filed by the Parties. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”), National Basketball Association (“NBA”), National Football League (“NFL”), National Hockey League (“NHL”), and Office of the Commissioner of Baseball doing business as Major League Baseball (“MLB”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “the Leagues”) f

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Jonathan Gehrieh filed this suit in July 2012 as a putative class action against Chase Bank for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Doc. 1. By July 2013, the parties were actively engaged in settlement discussions, Doc. 78, and in August 2014, they moved for prelimina

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

ACCEPTED 03-15-00215-CV 5182525 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

(Slip Opinion) Whether FCC’s Lifeline Program is a Benefit Subject to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 The Federal Communications Commission’s Lifeline program provides federal means- tested public benefits and must therefore comply with the eligibility restrictions set forth in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. Collecting a subscriber’s Social Security Number before enrol

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United . States District Judge Plaintiffs the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, the- Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, the National Association of Manufacturers,/ the National Retail Federation, and the Society for Human Resource Management (“the Chamber plaintiffs”) have brought thi

CONTENTS FINDINGS OF FACT. 183 I. Background. 183 A. Stipulations of Fact. 183 B. Briefs on CD-ROM With Appropriate Hyperlinks . 183 C. Relevant Taxpayers. 183 1. FCC . 183 2. First Chicago NBD Corp. 184