Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 50764 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Filed: March 14, 2025 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk v. ) ) EVELYN DOLORES FINK,

The order consolidating the above-styled causes is hereby vacated. It appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Peti-ion for Writ of Certiorari in Case No. 43,801, be and the same is hereby denied. The Petition herein for a Writ of Cer-tiorari to the District Court of Appeal, First District of Florida, in Case No. 43,800, is granted and the cause is hereby set down for oral argu

194 Ga. App. 874 (1990) 392 S.E.2d 535 BISHOP v. MANGAL BHAI ENTERPRISES, INC. A89A1619. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 20, 1990. Rehearing Denied March 15, 1990. David H. Fink, for appellant. Savell & Williams, Tash J. Van Dora, Michael Ryder, William S. Goodman, for appellee. B

791 A.2d 1235 (2002) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Sterling Clair FINK, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted October 30, 2001. Filed February 8, 2002. *1239 William C. Costopoulos, Lemoyne, for appellant. Christopher A. Ferro, Asst. Dist. Atty., York, for Commonwealth, appellee. Before S

Doerfer, J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Frederick B. Fink brought the present action against defendant Sylvia LaSelva for money had and received. In a Memorandum of Decision and Order *366dated August 19, 1998, this Court denied Fink’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment for LaSelva on the ground that Fink’s claim for the $55,539 allegedly

BY JUDGE PAUL M. PEATROSS, JR. This matter comes before die Court on a Motion to Suppress filed by Defendant Andrew Bishop. Oral argument was heard on the motion on April 22,1998, and the Court took the motion under advisement to consult the legal authority cited. Background The facts showed that Ron Kesner, Albemarle County Police Officer, was called to the residence of 2058

212 F.Supp.2d 518 (2002) Jerry L. BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. PEPPERTREE RESORTS, LTD., a/k/a Equivest, a/k/a Equivest Financial, Inc., a/k/a Equivest Finance, Inc., a/k/a Equivest Resorts, Inc., Defendant. No. CIV. 1:01CV87. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. July 24, 2002. *519 Wade Hall, Asheville

GRUBB, District Judge. Plaintiff, United States of America, has moved for a rehearing of the matters considered in this court’s decision and order of December 6, 1960, 188 F.Supp. 804. The defendants, Irving Isadore Lichterman, Daniel Edward Wigodski, Jacob Louis Shubow, and Eugene Philip Gillis, have made a motion to dismiss the motion of the plaintiff for rehearing. The matter was submitted on briefs. T

GRUBB, District Judge. These cases are before the court on the motions of the defendants, Irving Isadore Lichterman, Daniel Edward Wigodski, Jacob Louis Shubow, and Eugene Philip Gillis, for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The moving defendants were convicted of transporting and receiving stolen goods in interstate commerce and conspiracy in connection therewith in violation of Sec

899 P.2d 149 (1995) Stanley A. BISHOP, Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE and Anchorage Telephone Utility, Appellees. No. S-5988. Supreme Court of Alaska. July 28, 1995. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1995. *150 Edgar Paul Boyko, Edgar Paul Boyko and Associates, Anchorage, for appellant. Donald C. Ellis,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, District Judge. Petitioner, Shajdon Bishop, a/k/a Earl Wilson (“Wilson”) has filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Wilson is currently serving two concurrent terms of twenty-two years for rape and deviate sexual assault at the Pontiac Correctional Institution. On appeal, the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the convictions, People v. Wilson,

The appellee recovered judgment against the appellants for services rendered in procuring the settlement of a claim against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company on account of the death of an employee, Ralph Fink, husband of appellant Louise Fink, and father of five minor children, also appellants. A trial of appellee's claim was had by the court in which special findings of fact were made, in substance as follows: Ralph Fink, an employee of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, was ki

Houghton, J.: The plaintiff entered into a contract to purchase certain real estate and made a payment thereon. Defendant tendered a deed, which plaintiff refused to accept on the ground that the title was defective, and he brings this action to cancel his contract and recover his deposit. Defendant’s title rests upon a judgment of foreclosure obtained against a non-resident mortgagor and owner of the equity

Horton, C. J.: Upon the view that the land in question *275was conveyed with the express understanding it was to be held in trust for the Eock Creek congregation, I concur, with some doubt, in the judgment ordered. If, however, it had been established upon the trial that the title to the property was conveyed with the understanding between the parties

HaymoND, Judge, announced the opinion of the Court: The counsel for the appellees in this case claims in his argument and printed brief, that “ the very act of Sawtell purchasing out the sole plaintiff abated the suit,” and claims also> that plaintiff has no further interest in the subject-matter of the suit and cannot therefore ask this Court to have the final decree of dismissal reviewed. The coun

ALLEN, Circuit Judge. This suit originated as a petition for declaratory judgment instituted against appellee, assignee of Mayo patent No. 2,322, 041, by appellant, assignee of Sperry patent No. 2,353,274, asking that the court declare the right of appellant to manufacture cer*963tam specified automobile heaters without interference from the appellee, and hold the M

Morris, C. J. This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver. Appellants purchased a soda fountain from appellee, a corporation, at a price of $2,200, and, in part payment thereof, executed thirty-five notes for $50 each, secured by a chattel mortgage on the fountain. One note fell due on August 3, 1911, and one of the others matured each month thereafter for sixteen months. By a provision of the mortgage, f

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

758 F.Supp.2d 542 (2010) The CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. and Johnson Controls Interiors L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. LEAR CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 05 CV 3449. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 9, 2010. *543 Karl Regan Fink, Allen E. Hoover, John F. Flannery, Joseph Frank Marinelli, Rudy I. Kratz, Ka

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Santos (2021 NY Slip Op 01441) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Santos 2021 NY Slip Op 01441 Decided on March 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur