Cases

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from claims that major telecommunications carriers assisted the government with intelligence gathering following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. News reports that the National Security Agency (“NSA”) undertook a warrantless eavesdropping program with alleged cooperation by telecommunications companies spawned dozens of lawsuits

109 F.Supp.2d 285 (2000) In re CENDANT CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION No. CIV. 98-1664(WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 16, 2000. *286 Dennis J. Block, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, New York City. James E. Lyons, Thomas Stevens, Skadden, Aps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, San Francisco, CA. <

LEVINSON, Justice. These consolidated appeals oblige us to revisit Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 104 S.Ct. 2321, 81 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984), Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Lyman, 68 Haw. 56, 704 P.2d 888 (1985), and Takabuki v. Housing Finance and Development Corp., 72 Haw. 466, 822 P.2d 955 (1991), in order to address the question whether the Hawai'i Land Reform Act, Hawai'i Revised S

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge. Appellants, six co-venturers seeking to initiate a coal lightering service in Delaware Bay, claim that § 7003 of the Delaware Coastal Zone Act (CZA), which bans bulk product transfer facilities in Delaware’s coastal zone, violates the dormant Commerce Clause. Appellees, two Delaware officials and five intervenors, argue that the federal Coastal Zone Management

632 F.Supp. 1225 (1986) NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk Southern Marine Services, Inc., Lamberts Point Barge Co., Inc., Coastal Barge Corporation, Coal Logistics Corporation, and Coastal Carriers Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Charles M. OBERLY, III, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, and John E. Wilson, III, Secretary, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control of the State of Delaware, Defendants, Delaware Saltwate

216 F.2d 354 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Elizabeth Gurley FLYNN, Pettis Perry, Claudia Jones,Alexander Bittelman, Alexander Trachtenberg, Victor JeremyJerome, Albert Francis Lannon, Louis Weinstock, ArnoldSamuel Johnson, Betty Gannett, Jacob Mindel, William WolfWeinstone and George Blake Charney, Defendants-Appellants. No. 150, Docket 22763. United States Court of A

HARLAN, Circuit Judge. The thirteen defendants who appeal have been convicted of conspiring to violate the Smith Act by wilfully advocating and teaching the duty and necessity of overthrowing and destroying the Government of the United States by force and violence.1 The period of the conspiracy charged was from April 1, 1945 to June 20, 1951, the date of the filing of the indictment. The indictment

760 F.2d 1408 53 USLW 2566, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,025 BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and BGE Corp., Appellees,v.Frank O. HEINTZ; William A. Badger; Lilo K. Schifter;Wayne B. Hamilton; and Haskell N. Arnoldconstituting The Public ServiceCommission of Maryland, Appellants,andMaryland Office of People's Counsel, Defendant.BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and BGE Corp., Appellees,<

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUÑTZ, II, District Judge. In March 2012, Mark Wiley Lane was snorkeling with his family in the Turks & Caicos Islands when he was killed in a speedboat accident. Lisa Craig, individually, as executrix and personal representative of Lane’s estate, and as the parent and natural guardian of Trevor Lane (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), now bring this action against

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. December 2, 2024 A party may file with the Supreme Court a Samuel

2023 IL 129248 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 129248) JAMES R. ROWE, Kankakee County State’s Attorney, et al., Appellees, v. KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of Illinois, et al, Appellants.

HISTORIC BOARDWALK HALL, LLC, NEW JERSEY SPORTS AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentHistoric Boardwalk Hall, LLC v. Comm'rDocket No. 11273-07United States Tax

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, 1:21-cv-02131 (CJN) (MAU) v. PATRICK BYRNE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

OPINION DIETZEN, Justice. In this case, we revisit'the applicability of equitable subrogation to parties in a landlord-tenant relationship. Respondent Melrose Gates, LLC (Landlord) leased an apartment to appellants Chor Moua and Maisse Xiong (Tenants). The apartment building in which Tenants lived was damaged by a fire. Landlord’s insurer paid for the repairs to the building, and then the insurer brought

PER CURIAM. The State of Alabama appeals from two orders of the Macon Circuit Court dismissing the State’s petition for forfeiture of certain electronic-gambling devices and related records and currency located at Vic-toryLand casino (appeal no. 1141044). We reverse both orders and render a judgment for the State in appeal no. 1141044. KC Economic Development, LLC (“KCED”), cross-appeals (appeal no. 1150027). We dismiss KCED

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary.1156 I. Introduction .1159 II. Hobby Lobby and this case.1160 III. Background.1160 A. Regulatory Background.1160 1. The ACA Mandate and the Religious Employer Exemption.1160 2. The Accommodation Scheme for Religious Non-Profit O

MATHESON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs in this case are two corporations — Hobby Lobby and Mardel — and the owners and managers of those corporations — the Greens. Asserting claims under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) and the Free Exercise Clause, these corporate and individual plainti

630 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2009) William ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. Theo WHITE, et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P. United States District Court, E.D. California. May 15, 2009. *1171 Jennifer Lauren Riggs, Jones Day, Los Angeles, CA, Richard G. Bates, Jr., Law Offices of Richard G. Bates Jr., Concord, CA, for Plaintiff. D

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2024 UT 28 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH, on behalf of itself and its patients, physicians, and staff, Appellee, v. STATE OF UTAH, GOVERNOR SPENCER J. COX, in his offi

AMENDED MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: This complex litigation concerns, an alleged conspiracy by which prominent citizens of Kazakhstan purportedly looted billions of dollars from the City of Almaty, Kazakhstan (“Almaty”) and BTA Bank JSC (“BTA” and, together with Almaty, the “Kazakh Entities”), a formerly state-owned banking institutio