Cases

KING, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Unlike my friends in the panel majority and on the district court, I am satisfied that the disputed 45-mile segment of the majestic Yadkin River belongs to the people of North Carolina. I therefore write separately in dissent. The district court and the majority — in ruling against the State of North Carolina — have erred in several respects. To start, the federal court system s

Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA11-1280) Denied Jackson, J., Recused

724 S.E.2d 138 (2012) Marvin McDONALD, Cornelius Ford, Anthony Koonce, Perry Jones, Aaron Petty, Annie Polk, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, A North Carolina State Agency; North Carolina Department of Correction Management Information Systems, A Division of the North Carolina Department of Correction; Alvin W. Keller, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction; Bob Brinson, Chief Information Officer, North Carolina

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st of May 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: *385"Denied By Order of the Court in Conference, This

DISMISSED.

AFFIRMED.

NO ERROR IN PART. NO PLAIN ERROR IN PART.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 31A24 Filed 12 December 2025 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SCOTT EVERETT FORD Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (2023) from the unpublished decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 292 N.C. App. 111, 2024 WL 16286, affirming judgments entered on 1 July 2022 by Judge Alan Z. Thornburg in Superior Court, Buncombe County. On 16

BRYANT, Judge. *511 Where the admission of a "rap song" was not substantially more prejudicial than probative, we overrule defendant's argument that he is entitled to a new trial. The trial court's admission of "screenshots" from an internet website was not error. The admission of opinion te

TYSON, Judge. Larry Kennard Ford ("Defendant") appeals from judgment entered after a jury convicted him of one count of possession with intent to sell and deliver marijuana and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. We find no error in Defendant's conviction or the judgment entered thereon. I. Factual Background In November 2013, Winston-Salem Police Officer J.G. Gordon ("Officer Gor

Def’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Review the Order of the COA (COAP13-502) Dismissed Hudson, J., recused

The undersigned have reviewed the award based upon the record of the proceedings before the deputy commissioner. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. Upon reconsideration of the evidence as a whole, the undersigned reach different facts and conclusions from those reached by the deputy commissioner. The Full Commission, in their discretion, have determined that there are no good grounds in this case to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties o

Upon review of the competent evidence of record with respect to the errors assigned, the Full Commission finds good ground to reconsider the evidence. Having reconsidered the evidence of record, the Full Commission reverses the Decision and Order of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Decision and Order. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing on 24 February 1

710 S.E.2d 11 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. James Donovan FORD. No. 36P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 15, 2011. Mer O. Chut, for Ford, James Donovan. Jay Osborne, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C. Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of N.C. *12 ORDER</

710 S.E.2d 708 (2011) STATE v. FORD. No. COA10-318. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed March 1, 2011. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

706 S.E.2d 468 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Michael FORD. No. 481P10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 10, 2011. Michael Ford, for Ford, Michael. Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State. ORDER Upon consideration of the p

703 S.E.2d 768 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. James Donovan FORD, Defendant. No. COA10-470. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 21, 2010. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Jay L. Osborne, for the State. Mercedes O. Chut, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant. ROBERT C. HUNTER, Judge. Defendant James Donovan For

697 S.E.2d 524 (2010) STATE v. FORD. No. COA09-1428. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed July 6, 2010. Certification Date July 26, 2010. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

697 S.E.2d 333 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. Nicholas William FORD, Defendant and Ryan Charles Douglass, Defendant and Martin Douglass Murray, Defendant. No. 161P10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 19, 2010. Rich Cassady, for Nicholas William Ford. Richard E. Hopkins, for Ryan Charles Douglass. Bradley Tisdale, Franklin, for Martin D

JACKSON, Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part. Although I concur with the majority opinion in nearly all respects, I respectfully dissent from Part II in which the majority holds that the trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury on common law robbery. Because the issue was not preserved for our review, I would vote to dismiss it. Pursu