⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “FORMISANO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA”

District Court, D. Wyoming · 2014-04-07 · Published · cited 2× · 11 F. Supp. 3d 1119; 2014 WL 1383314; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49515
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCOTT W. SKAVDAHL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on motions for summary judgment filed by the following defendants (collectively, “Defendants”): (1) Gardner Denver, Inc. (ECF No. 151); (2) Bechtel, Inc. (ECF No. 152); (3) FMC Corporation (ECF No. 153
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997-08-04 · Published · cited 12× · 211 B.R. 508; 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1175; 31 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 282; 1997 WL 441648
211 B.R. 508 (1997) In re Michaeline Valentine D'ALFONSO, Debtor. Michaeline Valentine D'ALFONSO, Plaintiff, v. A.R.E.I. INVESTMENT CORP., Sheriff of Philadelphia, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 96-30515DAS, Adversary No. 97-0443DAS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 4, 1997. *509
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-02-17 · Published · cited 153× · 398 F.3d 211; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777; 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,932; 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 365; 2005 WL 375934
BACKGROUND POOLER, Circuit Judge: This is an employment discrimination case. Plaintiff-Appellant Dawn Dawson, a self-described “lesbian female, who does not conform to gender norms in that she does not meet stereotyped expectations of femininity and may be perceived as more masculine than a stereotypical woman,” claims that she suffered discrimination on
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-02-24 · Published · cited 10× · 246 F. Supp. 2d 301; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2614; 2003 WL 470341
246 F.Supp.2d 301 (2003) Dawn DAWSON, Plaintiff, v. BUMBLE & BUMBLE, Defendant. No. 01 Civ. 8814(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 24, 2003. *303 Rick Ostrove, Leeds, Morelli & Brown, P.C., Carle Place, NY, for plaintiff. Ellen M. Martin, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York, NY,
New Jersey Tax Court · 1995-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 14 N.J. Tax 597
HAMILL, J.T.C. The principal issue in this ease is whether an assessment of rollback taxes made after the filing of a petition in bankruptcy violates the automatic stay arising under § 362 of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”), 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Additional issues are (1) whether the county board’s notice of intent to assess rollback taxes was fatally defective, (2) whether a cessation of farming constitutes a change in