Cases

SUMMARY ORDER Frederick McMillian, proceeding pro se, appeals from a judgment of the District Court granting summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing his complaint in this Section 1983 action.1 McMillian alleges that the defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was in pretrial detention at the Onondaga County Justice Center (“OCJC”). On appeal, McMillian argues

Appellant brings this appeal from his conviction of burglary of a habitation after a plea of "not guilty" before a jury which assessed punishment at 35 years imprisonment. We will affirm. Appellant assigns two points of error. His first point claims there was no evidence, or alternatively, insufficient evidence, to support the jury's finding that Appellant committed the offense as alleged in the indictment. By his second point, Appellant contends that the trial court erred in d

Opinion issued July 17, 2008 In The Court of Appeals

PER CURIAM. Michael McMillian appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. While the notice of appeal is clearly untimely, McMillian has alleged facts which, if true, would entitle him to belated appellate review. See State ex rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, 316 So.2d 50 (Fla.1975). Turning to the merits of the motion, we agree with the trial court that McMillian has

422 Mich. 570 (1985) 374 N.W.2d 679 McMILLIAN v. VLIET Docket No. 70484, (Calendar No. 1). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued June 4, 1985. Decided September 24, 1985. Libner, Van Leuven & Kortering, P.C. (by Vernon D. Kortering), for the plaintiff. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J.

Jordan, Justice. In this divorce case the husband is the appellant in the main appeal. The wife filed a cross appeal. 1. The husband enumerates as error the denial of his motion for judgment on the pleadings on the issue of divorce. The husband sued for divorce on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken. The wife in her *279

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Frank Williams, Jr., sought habeas relief in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court 2 denied relief, and Williams filed additional motions requesting relief from judgment or requesting the judgment be altered or amen

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Faye Jones appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States Postal Service (USPS) and Postmaster General Anthony Frank on her Title VII claim that sex discrimination was at the root of her discharge for submitting a false employment application. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. She argues that there is a genuine issue of material fact pr

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Frank Bilello (Bilello), a Caucasian male, appeals the dismissal of his First Amended Complaint alleging Kum & Go, LLC, and Krause Gentle Corporation (collectively Kum & Go) violated 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a and 1981 (2000) by refusing patrons access to restroom facilities at stores located east of 42nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, while permitting patrons

Ralph O. Douglas v. Anson Financial, Inc., Don Bonner, and Mike Ferguson COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-410-CV MICHAEL SCOTT APPELLANT

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Frank Skomiak appeals from the final judgment entered by the.district court 1 on his conditional pleas of guilty to one drag count and one money laundering count. Skorniak contends that the district court erred in denying several of his pretrial motions and in determining his sentence. We affirm. <

*1020 McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Scott Frizzell appeals from a final order entered in the District Court 1 for the District of Nebraska denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Frizzell v. Hopkins, No. 4:CV93-3331 (D.

MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. David Mouser (“Mouser”) and Donald Green (“Green”) (together “plaintiffs”) appeal from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri 2 granting judgment as a matter of law (“JAML”) in favor of Caterpillar, Inc. (“defendant”), on plaintiffs’ claim

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Victor Carter filed this petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. The district court 1 denied habeas corpus relief. We affirm. I. BACKGROU

PER CURIAM. Frank Sam Early appeals his sentence of 144 months imprisonment imposed after he pled guilty to possession of cocaine base (“crack cocaine”) with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). *244 Early first challenges the district cou

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. The state of Missouri appeals from a final order entered in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri granting the petition for habeas relief filed by *498 Frank Wealot. Wealot v. Armontro

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. In 1984, Gary Keithley was convicted, upon trial to the court, of first degree sexual assault against his fourteen-year-old daughter, and was sentenced to fifteen to twenty-five years imprisonment. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal. State v. Keithley, 218 Neb. 707, 358 N.W.2d 761 (1984) (Keithley I).

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Frank J. Kissinger appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of South Dakota sentencing him to an eight-month split sentence (four months imprisonment and four months home confinement) following his guilty plea to being a narcotics user in possession of a

942 F.2d 1307 1991-2 Trade Cases P 69,548 SWENSEN'S ICE CREAM COMPANY; Swensen's, Inc., Appellants,v.CORSAIR CORPORATION; Donald Frank; Diane Frank, Appellees. No. 90-2481WM. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 9, 1991.Decided Aug. 27, 1991.Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 8, 1991.