Cases

PRESCOTT, J. *868 The petitioner, Travis Hampton, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that his

699 S.E.2d 616 (2010) BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF GEORGIA, INC. v. SHIRLEY. No. A10A0326. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 15, 2010. *617 Troutman Sanders, Jaime L. Theriot, Atlanta, for appellant. Jason C. Waymire, for appellee. MIKELL, Judge. A Gwinnett County jury awarded Melanie Suzanne Shirley $52,136

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DOUGLAS C., JR.* (SC 20456) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus A criminal information is duplicitous when it charges a defendant in a single count with two or more distinct and separate criminal offenses, thereby implicating the defendant’s constitutional right to a unanimous jury verdict. Convicted of five counts of t

Opinion DiPENTIMA, C. J. The self-represented defendant, Jacek I. Smigelski,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Stanley Kosiorek, executor of the estate of Stanislaw Kosiorek, following a jury trial.2 On appeal, the defendant presents a number of overlapping claims of error that stem primarily fro

ESPINOSA, J. The defendant, Jessie Campbell III, appeals, following a jury trial, from the judgment of conviction of capital felony in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 53a-54b (8), two counts of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a), attempt to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-54a (a), assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §

Opinion KATZ, J. At the time of the circumstances that gave rise to this appeal, General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 12-621 required, inter alia, municipal assessors to conduct *66revaluations, for taxation purposes, of all of the real property in their respective municipalities on a decennial basis. 2

FOTI, J. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempted murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-54a (a), carrying a pistol on his person without a permit in violation of General Statutes §§ 29-35 and 29-37 (b), and conspiracy to commit murder in violation *254of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-

Landau, J. The defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3), and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.1 *809The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) held that t

Opinion HEALEY, J. The defendant, Robert Torres, was tried before a jury on an information consisting of five counts. The first count charged the defendant with the crime of conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-54a1 which conspiracy *207resulted in the death of Glenroy Go

KATZ, J., dissenting. The Connecticut Code of Evidence (code) is a judicial codification of general rules of prospective application. These rules are the functional equivalent of laws. The judges of the Superior Court, a title that the justices of this court and the judges of the Appellate Court also hold, adopted the code in the exercise of their heretofore unquestioned rule-making authority in matters of procedure. Nonetheless,

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Peter Reilly and Donna Reilly, husband and wife, and their minor daughter, Heather, appellees before us, brought this medical malpractice action against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. Following a bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Rhode I