Cases

Philip M¡-Hess, Presiding Judge Introduction Fannie Mae appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Loüis City awarding it $161,816.08 for the breach of the obligation to pay net rents and $194,146.96 in attorney and expert fees. In four points on appeal, - Fannie Mae claims that the trial court erred by reducing Fannie Mae’s net rents damages because (1)-reduction'of damages is an affirmative defens

731 F.Supp.2d 1103 (2010) TARA WOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. FANNIE MAE; and Eichler, Fayne & Associates, a/k/a EF & A Funding, L.L.C. d/b/a Alliant Capital, L.L.C., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-cv-00832-MSK-MEH. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 12, 2010. *1109 Angela L. Ekker, Michael J. Mc

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery [filed December 23, 2009; docket # 69 ]. The matter is briefed and has been referred to this Court for disposition. Oral argument would not materially assist the Court in adjudicating the motion. For the reasons that follow, the Cou

624 F.3d 185 (2010) CASA ORLANDO APARTMENTS, LTD., Relating to Pine Haven Apartments; Jasper Housing Development Company, Relating to Pine View Apartments; Alfred Porkolab, Jean J. Porkolab; Alan B. Porkolab, as Trustee for the Porkolab Family Trust No. 1, Relating to Lowell Apartments, Lorain, Ohio, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-40997. Unit

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO FANNIE MAE, ) ) No. ED101796 Appellant/Cross-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of

ACCEPTED 07-15-00135-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 8/10/2015 5:01:19 PM

ORDER DENYING FANNIE MAE’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #21) AND GRANTING ROYAL MANOR’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 20) VICTORIA A. ROBERTS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a mortgage foreclosure action; Defendant Royal Manor Apartments, LLC (“Royal Manor”) does not dispute that foreclosure was legal: Royal Manor defaulted by not making the final payment, but timely r

183 B.R. 784 (1995) In re RIDGEWOOD APARTMENTS OF DeKALB COUNTY, LTD., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 2-92-08638. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 17, 1995. *785 *786 *787 *788 Stephen C. Greenberg, Hol

320 B.R. 391 (2005) In re GUNNISON CENTER APARTMENTS, LP, Debtor. No. 04-33079 MER. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. February 8, 2005. *393 Gary R. Appel, Appel & Lucas, P.C., Denver, CO, for Debtor Gunnison Center Apartments, LP. *394 Douglas W. Jessop, Kerstin E. Cass, Jessop

MEMORANDUM OPINION . LETITIA Z. PAUL, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The court has held a joint trial on the above captioned adversary proceeding, and *402in the instant Chapter 11 case, the “Amended Motion for (I) Allowance of Secured Claim and Reasonable Fees, Costs, and Charges Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016 and (ii) E

MARTIN, Chief Justice. **103In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's order addressing the appropriate measure of damages in a condemnation action. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) condemned a leasehold interest held by Adams Outdoor Advertising of Charlotte Limited Partne

OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd., and ECF Special Securities, LLC — two hedge funds that invested in a series of mortgage-backed securities — bring this diversity action against Defendants Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“M & T”), Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”), and various affiliated entities of SPS (“SPS Affilia

460 B.R. 567 (2011) In re WALKABOUT CREEK LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Debtors. No. 09-00632. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia. November 14, 2011. *569 Darrell W. Clark, Janet M. Nesse, Katherine Sutcliffe Becker, Lawrence P. Block, Marc Albert, Tracey Michelle Ohm, Stinson Morriso

743 F.Supp.2d 575 (2010) C.B. FLEET COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED, and Aspen Underwriting Syndicate 4711 at Lloyd's London, Defendants. Case No. 6:09-cv-00062. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division. October 15, 2010. *577 John Eric Sorenson, Jr., Edmunds & Williams PC, Willi

223 B.R. 756 (1998) In re SAGEWOOD MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. BK-N 96-31923. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada. June 30, 1998. *757 *758 *759 Hartman & Armstrong, Ltd., Reno, NV, for Debtor. Matthew Callister, Ca

162 B.R. 490 (1993) EDGEWATER WALK APARTMENTS, an Illinois Limited Partnership, Debtor-Appellant, v. MONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee. No. 93 C 3612. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. December 10, 1993. *491 *492 Joel H. Shapiro, Kamenear, Kadison & Anderson

95 B.R. 605 (1988) In re PARK AVENUE PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 88-02877. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. December 23, 1988. *606 *607 James O. Huber and Leonard G. Leverson, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, Wis., for Fannie Mae. Paul G. Swanson, Oshkosh

JEFFREY S. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *943Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"). Having considered the parties' arguments, relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART Fannie Mae's motion to dismiss.

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING FANNIE MAE’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(3) JEROME FELLER, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is Fannie Mae’s motion for relief from the automatic stay *32pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(3) in the jointly administered, single asset real estate cases of RYYZ, LLC (“LLC”) and RYYZ 2,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 6, 2019 Decided August 21, 2020 No. 17-5265 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. DYNAMIC V ISIONS INC, DOING BUSINESS AS DYNAMIC V ISIONS HOME HEALTH SERVICES AND ISAIAH M. BONGAM, OWNER AND PRESIDENT OF DYNAMIC VISIONS INC., APPELLANTS Consol