Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL FARRELL, No. 19-16130 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:16-cv-02711- NC BOEING EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION; MOORE BREWER & WOLFE, a Professional Corporation, OPINI

701 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2010) Erick T. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant. No. 08-CV-1007-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. March 29, 2010. *1175 Elizabeth Farrell Oberlin, Hillsboro, OR, for Plaintiff. Dwight C. Holton, United States Attorney, Katherine C. Lorenz,

OPINION OF THE COURT Sullivan, J. On February 22, 2002 at about 6:30 p.m., near the end of his work shift, plaintiff, a utility worker employed by Aramark Educational Services, the exclusive food services contractor for the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT), slipped and fell on a food substance near the freight elevator on the fifth floor at an FIT facility in Manhattan, thereby sustaining injuries. He the

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. 2018-0816-JTL CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) OPINION ON FEE AWARD AND INCENTIVE AWARD Date Submitted: April 19, 2023 Date Decided: July 31, 2023 Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Brendan W. Sullivan, Casimir O. Szustak, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Dominic Minerva, Joseph Cotilletta, Nathaniel Blakney, LA

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is an age discrimination case wherein Plaintiff Lisa Marconi (“Marconi”) contends' that Defendant Moon Area School District (“Moon” or the “District”) unlawfully denied her employment applications for entry level teaching positions in three successive school years, (i.e., 2010-2011; 2011-2012; and 2012-2

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 495–608 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the court are: (1) Defendant Applied Finishing, Inc.’s (“Applied Finishing”) motion for summary judgment (AF Mot. (Dkt. #21)), and (2) Defendant Michael Soden’s motion for summary judgment (Soden Mot. (Dkt. # 22)). The court has considered the motions, all submissions filed in support of a

480 F.Supp.2d 782 (2007) Andrew FULLMAN, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-1352. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 28, 2007. *783 *784 Andrew Fullman, Philadelphia, PA, pro se. *785

595 F.Supp.2d 547 (2009) Nagi YOUSSEF v. ANVIL INTERNATIONAL, et al. Civil Action No. 06-4926. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 22, 2009. *549 Nina B. Shapiro, Lancaster, PA, for Plaintiff. John L. Senft, Senft Law Firm, LLC, York, PA, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM RE SUMMARY JUDGMEN

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTI, Chief Judge. I. Introduction Pending before the court is a motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 94) filed by plaintiff Diane DeCecco (“plaintiff’ or “DeCecco”) and a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 97) filed by DeCecco’s former employer, defendants UPMC and UPMC Presbyterian Shady side (collectively “defendants” or “UPMC”).

695 A.2d 63 (1997) Esther Hager FRANCIS, Director, District of Columbia Department of Public Works, Appellant, v. RECYCLING SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee. RECYCLING SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellant, v. Esther Hager FRANCIS, Director, District of Columbia Department of Public Works, Appellee. Nos. 95-CV-576, 95-CV-1063 and 95-CV-1044. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Arg

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1644 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CROWN CENTRAL LLC; CROWN CENTRAL NEW HOLDINGS LLC; CHEVRON CORP.; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXON MOBIL CORP.; EXXON

376 Pa. Superior Ct. 90 (1988) 545 A.2d 334 Ansy L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. EXTRACORPOREAL, INC. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 11, 1988. Filed July 11, 1988. *92 Richard W. Rogers, Norristown, for appellant. James E. Farrell, Jr., New Hope, for appellee. Before TAMILIA, HOFFMAN

Fifth Amendment Taking; Lucas Categorical Taking; Regulatory Taking; Penn Central Factors; Just Compensation; Highest and Best Use of Property; Posttrial Award OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Plaintiffs Love Terminal Partners, L.P. (“Love Terminal Partners”) and Virginia Aerosp

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: Defendants, Sturm Foods, Inc., and its parent company Treehouse Foods, Inc., manufactured single-serve coffee cups for use in Keurig machines and marketed them under the name Grove Square Coffee (“GSC”). The eight named Plaintiffs each purchased GSC, but were extremely unsatisfied with their purchase. They claim that Defendants packaged, marketed, distrib

626 F.Supp. 1330 (1986) Gloria TREVINO, et al. v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION. Civ. A. No. B-83-573-CA. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. February 3, 1986. *1331 Wayne Fisher, Charles M. Price and Michael J. Maloney, Fisher, Gallagher, Perrin & Lewis, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs. Herbert L

389 F.Supp.2d 1253 (2005) Xiangyuan ZHU, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 04-2539-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 22, 2005. *1254 *1255 *1256 Xiangyuan Zhu, Topeka, KS, pro se. Emily

165 F.Supp.2d 1181 (2001) Xiangyuan (Sue) ZHU, Plaintiff, v. COUNTRYWIDE REALTY, COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 00-2290-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 10, 2001. *1182 *1183 *1184 David S. Whinery, Lawrence, KS, Xiangyua

923 F.Supp. 1322 (1996) George W. WAYMAN, Dale Stanislaus, Jess C. Smith, Arlin "Bud" F. Roat, Brad Rhodes, Charlie Reid, John Reents, James L. McKown, Thomas McClernon, Donald B. Howell, Buddy R. Hill, Robert Henderson, Robert C. Conner, Harold Clarke, and Troy M. Botkin, Plaintiffs, v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY, a Maryland Corporation, Defendant. Civil Action No. 91-1451-MLB. United States District Court, D.