Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Faulkner v. Barnhart”
Jawad v. Barnhartpublic domain
370 F.Supp.2d 1077 (2005) Kais H. Al JAWAD, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 04CV0246BTMBLM. United States District Court, S.D. California. May 13, 2005. *1078 Alexandra T. Manbeck, Law Offices of Alexandra Manbeck, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff. Carol C. Lam, United States
Faulkner v. National Geographic Societypublic domain
211 F.Supp.2d 450 (2002) Douglas FAULKNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, et al., Defendants. David Hiser, et al., Plaintiffs, v. National Geographic Society, et al., Defendants. Nos. 97CIV.09361LAK, 99CIV.12488LAK. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 13, 2002. *451
Great American Life Insurance v. Dixonpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the following motions: Plaintiffs motion for an order to pay disputed death benefit proceeds (less its attorneys’ fees and costs) into the Court and to dismiss it with prejudice from this action (doc. 18), Defendant Marvin Shenkin’s memorandum in opposition (doc. 22), Plaintiffs reply (doc. 24) and Defendant Marvin Shenkin’s sur
Clark v. Enchanted Hills Community Assn.public domain
[Cite as Clark v. Enchanted Hills Community Assn., 2020-Ohio-553.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY BETTY L. CLARK, : Case No. 19CA4 : PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE : v. : : DECISION AND JUDGME
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
665 F.Supp.2d 883 (2009) HIGH CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. KOROLATH OF NEW ENGLAND, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:07-CV-00395. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 25, 2009. *885 Anthony Gallo Covatta, Jr., Drew & Ward, Cincinnati, OH, Jason A. Levine, Matthew M. Leland, Bobby R. Burc
Ibrahim v. U.S. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
OPINION LAMBERTH, Senior District Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Dr. Rahinah Ibrahim appeals the district court’s award of attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and the Supreme Court’s decision in Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). She co
Veney v. Astruepublic domain
(2008) Nilda N. VENEY, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,[1] Defendant. Civil No. 3:07CV00004. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. February 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' cross-motio
Pollitt v. Mobay Chemical Corp.public domain
*103DECISION AND ENTRY RELATING TO PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS; INLAND’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, CONSIDERED AS A MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY A SUBPOENA, SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING ENTRY UPON LAND OVERRULED; INLAND’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER BARRING PLAINTIFFS’ ENTRY UPON LAND CONSIDERED AS A MEMORANDUM CONTRA AND NOT RULED UPON
Hudson v. Hilopublic domain
198 S.W.3d 569 (2004) 88 Ark. App. 317 Richard J. HUDSON and Erma J. Hudson, Husband and Wife, Appellants v. Emile C. HILO and Jennifer M. Hilo, Husband and Wife, Appellees. No. CA 04-57. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. November 17, 2004. *570 Rice & Adams, by: Ben E. Rice, Jacksonville, fo
Peter Mayer Publishers Inc. v. Shilovskayapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge. This is a declaratory judgment action that involves a copyright dispute. In 1995, Ardis Publishers, the predecessor-in-interest to Plaintiff Peter Mayer Publishers, Inc., d/b/a Overlook Press, secured a copyright to the English translation (“the Translation”) of The Master and Margarita (“the Work”), a Russian novel written b
Stewart v. Beachpublic domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Sturgeon Stewart appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants on his claims under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (RLUIPA). Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND
Lind v. Astruepublic domain
530 F.Supp.2d 456 (2008) Charlotte B. LIND, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner *457 of Social Security,[1] Defendant No. 05-CV-6162L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 10, 2008. *458 Mark M. McDonald, Bond and McDonald, Geneva, NY, for Plaintiff.
Stratton v. Arkansas State Highway Commissionpublic domain
Donald L. Corbin, Justice. Appellant, Phil Stratton, appeals the amended order of the Faulkner County Circuit Court, filed on November 15, 1995, granting the motion to dismiss of appellee, Arkansas State Highway Commission, for the reason that appellant’s suit against a constitutional agency of the State of Arkansas is an impermissible suit against the State. Appellant, who is an attorney, commenced this a
Anderson v. Spellingspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge This protracted litigation presents two novel legal issues concerning application of the Rehabilitation Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to a federal employer. Over seven years ago, the regional offices of the Rehabilitation Services Administration, a division within the De
Diane S. P. v. Berryhillpublic domain
Mark S. Davis, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiff, Diane S. P. ("Plaintiff"), with the assistance of counsel, brought this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying her claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the provis
ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 108] filed by defendant the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (“CSB”); Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Material Filed in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 124] filed by plaintiff Francisco Altamira-no; and Plaintiffs Motion to Strike
Football Ass'n Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube, Inc.public domain
633 F.Supp.2d 159 (2009) THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED, Bourne Co. (together with its affiliate Murbo Music Publishing, Inc.), Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc., CAL IV Entertainment LLC, Robert Tur d/b/a Los Angeles News Service, National Music Publishers' Association, The Rodgers & Hammerstein Organization, Stage Three Music (U.S.), Inc., Edward B. Marks Music Company, Freddy Bienstock Music Company d/b/a Bienstock Publis
Rose v. Arkansas State Plant Boardpublic domain
213 S.W.3d 607 (2005) John ROSE; Stephen Rose; Tom Burnham; Oliver Coppedge; John Starnes; John McCord; Glenda Lee Coppedge; Billy Crosskno; Chris Crosskno; Judy Crosskno; Roy A. Gaines; R.D. Jackson; Kenny Jackson; Charles Richard Haynes; W.T. Moody; Greg Alexander; George A. Hale III; Margery Hale; Bill Griggs; John R. Taylor; Kent Gipson; Shannon Sanders; Jerry Lyn Sanders; Jerry D. Qualls; Leon Brothers; Ronnie Burks; Jerry Nall; Bob Nall; Wesley Dav
Vincent v. City of Sulphurpublic domain
MEMORANDUM RULING PATRICIA MINALDI, District Judge. Before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity [Doc. 23], filed by the City of Sulphur, Lewis Coats, Chief of Police for the City of Sulphur, Officer Chester Gremillion and *632Officer Glenn Martin (defendants), to which the pro se