⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Federal Trade Commission v. International Markets Live, Inc.”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION How times have changed. Not so long ago, a company called Facebook so dominated the provision of personal social-networking services that a
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 21-873 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 41
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION At the time of the last great antitrust battle in our courthouse — between the United States and Microsoft — Mark Zuckerberg was still in high
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:22-mc-54 (RJL/GMH) MATCH GROUP, INC., Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In March 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Petitioner”)
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1080 (JDB) SURESCRIPTS, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment. This case arises from loyalty pricing contracts offered beginning in 2010 by defendant S
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1080 (JDB) SURESCRIPTS, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment. This case arises from loyalty pricing contracts offered beginning in 2010 by defendant S
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-03-31 · Published · cited 5× · 176 F. Supp. 3d 757; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45057; 2016 WL 1315063
Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) and the Attorney General of Florida brought this suit against Life-watch Inc. and its chief executive officer, Evan Sirlin, alleging violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq., the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”),. 16 C.F.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. WILH. WILHELMSEN HOLDING ASA, WILHELMSEN MARITIME SERVICES AS, Civil Action No. 18-cv-00414-TSC RESOLUTE FUND II, L.P., DREW MARINE INTERMEDIATE B.V., AND DREW MARINE GROUP, INC.,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-11-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 23-3757 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cv-00047- DWL v. SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS OPINION INC., a corporation doing business as Success By Health, doing business as Success By Media, SUCCESS BY M
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013-08-07 · Published · cited 1× · 725 F.3d 1356; 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1864; 2013 WL 4007535; 35 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1921; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16282
REYNA, Circuit Judge, concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part. I. The Smartphone has defined modern life. Be it in the workplace, the home, airports, or entertainment venues across America, individuals are tethered to them handheld devices. Not long ago, users primarily spoke into these devices. Today, fingers tapping, grazing, pinching, or scrolling the
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-01-17 · Published · cited 16× · 994 F. Supp. 2d 461; 2014 WL 199514; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6433
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: In this civil enforcement action, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the State of Florida, and the State of New York (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) sue a group of corporate entities (the “Corporate Defendants”) that this Opinion will refer to as the “Tax Club Enterprise” or the “Enterprise,” and four people associated with the Enterprise (the
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-09-12 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:18-cv-01622 (TNM) TRONOX LIMITED et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION* Last year, two of the world’s largest titanium dioxide (“TiO2”) producers announc
District Court, D. Nevada · 2015-03-31 · Published · cited 1× · 96 F. Supp. 3d 1110; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42196
ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. I. SUMMARY Before the Court are Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) Motion for Summary Judgment Against All Corporate Liability Defendants (“Motion”) (dkt. nos. 1235, 1280) and Motion For Summary Judgment Against All Individual and Relief Defendants (“Individual Liability Motion”) (dkt. nos. 1278, 1279). Also before the Court is Relief D
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-06-22 · Published · cited 3× · 878 F. Supp. 2d 1048; 2012 WL 2930418; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97905
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) brought this action for injunctive and monetary equitable relief against Commerce Planet, Inc. (“Commerce Planet”) and several of its directors and officers, including Michael Hill, Aaron Gravitz, and Charles Gugliuzza (collectively, “Defendants”), for deceptive and unfair busin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-05-14 · Published · cited 15× · 604 F.3d 1150; 70 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 699; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9888; 2010 WL 1930229
604 F.3d 1150 (2010) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEOVI, INC., DBA Neovi Data Corporation, DBA Qchex.com; G7 Productivity Systems, Inc., DBA Qchex.com; James M. Danforth, individually, and as an officer of Neovi, Inc. and G7 Productivity Systems, Inc.; Thomas Villwock individually, and as an officer of Neovi, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 09-55093. United States Court of Appeals,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 20-10790 Date Filed: 11/04/2021 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-10790 ____________________ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ON POINT CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, a limited
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 28× · 17 F.4th 1066
USCA11 Case: 20-10790 Date Filed: 11/04/2021 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-10790 ____________________ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ON POINT CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, a limited
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-02-25 · Published · cited 53× · 743 F.3d 886; 93 Fed. R. Serv. 1031; 2014 WL 703739; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3476
DAVIS, Circuit Judge: ' The Federal Trade Commission sued Kristy Ross in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland for engaging in deceptive internet advertising practices. After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment enjoining Ross from participating in the deceptive practices and holding her jointly and severally liable for equitable monetary consumer redres
District Court, D. Kansas · 2011-07-26 · Published · cited 3× · 849 F. Supp. 2d 1085; 2011 WL 3111948; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81893
*1091 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. This is a consumer protection action against several individual and corporate defendants for their roles in marketing and selling to consumers grant-related goods and services upon allegedly false representations that the consumers were guaranteed or likely to receive grants and
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009-06-29 · Published · cited 99× · 570 F.3d 1187; 48 Communications Reg. (P&F) 208; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14480; 2009 WL 1846344
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Abika.com is a website that has sold various personal data, including telephone records. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought suit against the operator of the website, Accusearch Inc., and its president and owner, Jay Patel (collectively, Accusearch), to curtail Accusearch’s sale of confidential information and to require it to disgorge its profits from the sale of information in telephone recor