Cases

OPINION Stanceu, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Fedmet Resources Corporation (“Fedmet”), a U.S. importer, challenges an internal directive of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”) that targeted only Fedmet. Designated by Customs as a “user defined rule,” or “UDR,” the directive instructed Customs port directors on bonding to secure potential

OPINION AND ORDER STANCEU, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Fedmet Resources Corporation (“Fedmet”), a U.S. importer, contests decisions by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”) requiring Fed-met to post 260.24% ad valorem single transaction bonds (“STBs”) to obtain release of Fedmet’s imported merchandise. The

OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Before the court are the final results of Defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) redetermination pursuant to this court’s Order, Fedmet Res. Corp. v. United States, No. 12-00215 (CIT March 30, 2015), ECF No. 89 (“Remand Order”), instructing Com

OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Before the court is Fedmet Resources Corporation’s (“Fedmet”) USCIT Rule 56.2 motion for judgment on the agency record appealing the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) fi *1350 nal scope ruling regarding anti

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALLACH. REYNA, Circuit Judge. Fedmet Resources Corporation (“Fed-met”) appeals a final decision of the U.S. *914Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) denying Fedmet’s motion for judgment upon the agency record and affirming the Department of Commer

Slip Op. 24-136 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 23-00117 FEDMET RESOURCES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and MAGNESIA CARBON BRICKS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION

Slip Op. 14-141 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE FEDMET RESOURCES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge v. Court No. 14-00297 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Deny

Slip Op. 25-136 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 23-00117 FEDMET RESOURCES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and MAGNESIA CARBON BRICKS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [S

OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Before the court are the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Court Remand in Fengchi Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City v. United States, 39 CIT -, -, 70 F.Supp.3d 1255, - (2015) (“Fengchi I ”). See Fin

OPINION and ORDER TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: ‘ Plaintiffs Fengchi Import and Export Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City, Fengchi Refractories Co. of Haicheng City, and Fed-met Resources Corporation (collectively “Plaintiffs”), move for judgment on the agency record contesting defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determinatio

*1389 OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Plaintiffs Fengchi Import and Export Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City, Fengchi Refractories Co. of Haicheng City, and Fed-met Resources Corporation (collectively “Plaintiffs”), move for judgment on the agency record contesting defen

Case: 20-2157 Document: 66 Page: 1 Filed: 07/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TRANSPACIFIC STEEL LLC, BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI VE TICARET A.S., BORUSAN MANNESMANN PIPE U.S. INC., THE JORDAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNITED STATES, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,

Slip Op. No. 23-16 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CHENG SHIN RUBBER IND. CO. LTD., Plaintiff, Vv. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: Stephen Alexander Vaden, Judge Court No. 21-00398 OPINION AND ORDER [Affirming Commerce’s Final Determination. ] Dated: February 138, 2023 Amrietha Nellan, Winton & Chapm

Slip Op. 17- 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNITED STEEL AND FASTENERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge Defendant, Court No. 13-00270 and SHAKEPROOF ASSEMBLY COMPONENTS DIVISION OF ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., Defendant-Intervenor.

Restani, Judge: In this action challenging a final scope ruling issued by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ("Commerce") regarding Atkore Steel Components, Inc. ("Atkore")'s cast iron electrical conduit fittings, Atkore moves the court to hold Commerce's Scope Ruling, that Atkore's cast iron electrical conduit articles fall within the antidumpi

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SIEMENS ENERGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant TITAN WIND ENERGY (SUZHOU) CO., LTD., CS WIND TECH CO., LTD., CS WIND VIETNAM CO., LTD., CHENGXI SHIPYARD CO., LTD., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________

OPINION AND ORDER Gary S. Katzmann, Judge Polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”) is all around us. PET is a polymer with a great number of uses—for instance, PET film could be found in tamper-evident food packaging such as potato chip bags and safety seals, in frozen and refrigerated food packaging, in laminated materials such as traffic signs, in printab

OPINION AND ORDER Stanceu, Chief Judge: In this litigation, plaintiff Trade Associates Group, Ltd. (“Trade Associates”), a U.S. importer of candles, contested a 2011 “Final Scope Ruling” of the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Depart

Slip Op. 15- 79 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE RUBBERMAID COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS LLC, : Plaintiff, : v. : Court No. 11-00463 UNITED STATES, : Defendant. : [Sustaining Commerce’s remand results revising interpretation of exclusions from scope of

410 F.Supp.2d 507 (2006) Shirlene GRAY, Plaintiff, v. SAGE TELECOM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIVA305CV1677GECF. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. January 19, 2006. Jerry Hicks, Gant & Hicks, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff. *508 Lawrence J. McNamara, Robin D. Gooch, Locke Liddell & Sapp, Den