Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ferguson v. Fox”
Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.public domain
*657 ORDER COOK, Chief Judge. In 1993, Varity Corporation (Varity) unilaterally modified a retirement health program that had been established for the benefit of its employees through the collective bargaining process prior to its acquisition of the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, Masseyr Ferguson, Inc. (Massey-Ferguson). Varity’s administ
Fox v. Fergusonpublic domain
765 S.W.2d 689 (1989) John N. FOX and Georganne Fox, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Eugene W. FERGUSON and Patricia J. Ferguson, Defendants/Appellants. No. 54642. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. February 14, 1989. *690 Steinberg, Crotzer & Garland, Charles L. Ford, St. Louis, for defendants/appellants.<
Lau, J. ¶1 Richard and Marnie Fox appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion for a writ of mandamus *260 seeking to compel Skagit County to issue a building permit. The Foxes argue the trial court erred when it ruled that the well on their property, despite being exempt from the water permit re
Fox v. Moultriepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 611 Steven K. Fox, various Charleston County offices, and the Department of Revenue appeal the master-in-equity's finding that a person buying a property in a county delinquent property tax sale purchased the property subject to outstanding Internal Revenue Service (IRS) liens. We affirm.
Ferguson v. Foxpublic domain
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Finch and McAvoy, JJ.
Ferguson v. Foxpublic domain
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Smith, Page, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB , HALL, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I concur in Parts I — III of the majority opinion, but dissent from Part IV. I disagree with the majority that the district court properly exercised its discretion in sanctioning Ramirez’s attorney. Although Ramirez’s attorney was remiss in simply changing the title of his motion papers and submitting the same set of papers twice, I ca
Order entered October 24, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00278-CV MOHAMED MOHAMED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A.M., A MINOR, Appellants V. THE BLAZE, INC., GLENN BECK, CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY, JIM HANSON, FOX TELEVISIO
Order entered September 19, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00278-CV MOHAMED MOHAMED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A.M., A MINOR, Appellant V. THE BLAZE, INC., GLENN BECK, CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY, J
Order entered September 18, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00278-CV MOHAMED MOHAMED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A.M., A MINOR, Appellant V. THE BLAZE, INC., GLENN BECK, CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY,
Order entered August 2, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00278-CV MOHAMED MOHAMED, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A.M., A MINOR, Appellants V. THE BLAZE, INC., GLENN BECK, CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY, JIM HANSON, FOX TELEVISION STA
Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.public domain
206 Kan. 97 (1970) 476 P.2d 646 F.A. FOX, Appellant, v. MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Appellee. No. 45,819 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed November 7, 1970. Van Smith, of Corley, Braun & Smith, of Garden City, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant. Dale E. Saffels, of Fleming,
In Re The Dependency Of A.l.f. Floyd A. Fox v. Dshspublic domain
[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals March 24, 2016.] Schindler, J. ¶1 When a criminal defendant files a motion to enlarge time under RAP 18.8(b) to file an untimely appeal of a conviction, the State must establish the defendant made a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his state constitutional right to appeal. Because a parent does not hav
United States v. Christian Fergusonpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0079p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap
FOX v. MIZEpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:FOX v. MIZE FOX v. MIZE2018 OK 75Case Number: 116489Decided: 09/18/2018THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2018 OK 75, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. <
Ferguson v. Fox's Administratorpublic domain
JUDGE SIMPSON delivered the ohnion oe the court: Fox being the owner of a slaughter-house in the city of Cincinnati, was employed by Ferguson to slaughter for him a large lot of fat hogs. The hogs were delivered to Fox to be slaughtered, on the 24th of November, 1853. By the agreement of the parties, they were to be slaughtered on delivery; but they were not slaughtered for several days afterwards.
State v. Foxpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Fox, 2018-Ohio-1995.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. John W. Wise, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise
Jay Ferguson v. City of Richwoodpublic domain
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED JAY FERGUSON, November 1, 2023 Plaintiff Below, Petitioner EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
Blue Fox Inc. v. Small Business Administrationpublic domain
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: Blue Fox appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the Small Business Administration and the Department of the Army. *1359Blue Fox was a subcontractor which worked on a construction project at an Army Depot. After the prime contractor failed to pay Blue Fox in full, Blue Fox sought an equitable lien against funds held by the Army and Smal
BAP Appeal No. 23-3 Docket No. 51 Filed: 01/23/2024 Page: 1 of 30 NOT FOR PUBLICATION 1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ IN RE MOTIVA PERFORMANCE BAP No. NM-23-003 ENGINEERING, LLC, Debtor. ___________________________________ Bankr. No. 19-125