Cases

507 F.Supp.2d 214 (2007) VAN BLARCOM CLOSURES, INC., Plaintiff, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., Defendant. No. 04 CV 1993(RDJ)(SMG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 24, 2007. *215 *216 Jeremy A. Kaufman, Martin B. Pavane, Lisa Ferrari, Roger Sherman Thompson, Cohen, Pontani, Liebe

681 F.Supp.2d 309 (2010) METSO MINERALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. POWERSCREEN INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION LIMITED, Terex Corporation, Powerscreen New York, Inc. and Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc., Defendants. No. 06-cv-1446 (ADS)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 28, 2010. *313 Cohen, Pontani, Leiberman &

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. This case pits an old hand at trademark law against the new kid on the block: Abercrombie & Fitch sued American Eagle Outfitters to stop American Eagle from infringing what A & F describes as its unregistered “trade dress,” made protecta-ble by Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. A & F claimed that AE impermissibly c

WERDEGAR, J. I respectfully dissent. I cannot accept the majority’s conclusion that plaintiffs are statutorily barred from suing the maker of the semiautomatic assault weapon used to massacre the victims in this case. Neither the letter of Civil Code section 1714.4 nor the legislative policy it embodies bars this action for negligence in the marketing of a firearm. *49

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOAN DOE, as Guardian ad litem for ) JANE DOE, a minor, ) Plaintiff,) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N24C-09-030-PRW ) SNAP, INC., a/k/a SNAPCHAT, INC., ) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, ) INC., APPLE INC., and ANTHONY ) N. OMEIRE ) Defendants

RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge *973TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF DECISION...973 II. BACKGROUND...976 III. STANDING...977 A. Legal Standard...977 B. Findings of Fact Related to Standing...977 C. Conclusions of Law Related to S

*1182ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this case, the first Foreign Corrupt Practices Act criminal prosecution against a corporation to proceed to jury trial, the Court has been asked to vacate the convictions and dismiss the indictment because of alleged pro

HERRON, J., Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. has filed preliminary objections to the amended complaint of plaintiff Louis Trujillo. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the court is issuing a contemporaneous order sustaining the objections in part and overruling the objections in part. BACKGROUND This action revolves around State Farm’s standard automobile i

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the District Court was clearly erroneous when it decided that a steering failure experienced by the tug ALICE ST. PHILIP was caused by the separation of defective steering components supplied by Gulf-Tampa Drydock Company (Gulf-Tampa). We also must decide whether a “red letter” clause in Gulf-Tampa’s contract with the tug’s operators and owners (St.

765 A.2d 306 (2000) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Lisa Michelle LAMBERT, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 14, 1999. Filed December 18, 2000. *314 Peter S. Greenberg, Philadelphia, for appellant. Christy H. Fawcett, Deputy Attorney General, Harrisburg, for Com., appellee. Befor

130 N.J. 109 (1992) 613 A.2d 1059 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT O. MARSHALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued January 21, 1992. Decided July 28, 1992. *116 Dale Jones, Assistant Public Defender, Judith L. Borman, First Assistant Deputy Public

Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge This Order addresses the pending Motions to Dismiss in one of the two separate tracks of this MDL-the consumer class cases track. The consumer class track consists of cases filed by individual consumers or third-party payors who allege they purchased EpiPens for consumption by themselves, their families, or their members, employees, insureds, participants, or beneficiaries. After the